|
ChelseaChee wrote: I liked your port because it has variety and you emote well in front of the camera. But you have a 0-0-0 figure. I think you should stick to photography and retouching. May 27 13 05:23 am Link Alice of Legend wrote: Some astounding work, some amateurish work in your port. You need to weed out the amateurish ones. May 27 13 10:04 am Link Yes, please.. May 27 13 10:21 am Link Digital Blitz wrote: Thank you very much for looking at both and for your advise!! May 27 13 12:34 pm Link Sure! May 27 13 12:58 pm Link Do me now May 27 13 01:57 pm Link Railey wrote: You have a good port - but from a photographer's perspective - the pictures do not emphasize your face or figure... How about getting a good photographer and tell him what you want and get a portfolio going? TFCD if it must. May 27 13 07:37 pm Link Yes, please. Thanks! May 27 13 07:40 pm Link Leah_Doll wrote: You bet you need more in your port for someone to assess it correctly. How about getting them on a TFCD basis. May 27 13 07:43 pm Link I'm curious  May 28 13 01:13 am Link Give it to me! I'm curious. May 28 13 02:27 am Link Oooouch.....Thanks for the advice. Good to hear someone say "shit" and cut the string rather than false expectations and laughs. I only gave it a try because of the other photographic aspects I was involved in ..... Back to the drawing board......... May 28 13 02:54 am Link Fen Lingling wrote: A Scandinavian brunette model in Beijing. wow! I like your height and figure. Let's build a port on TFCD. May 28 13 04:25 pm Link SaturdayLA wrote: Your port tells me this - you are a beautiful model with an awesome figure and JUST ONE expression. You need to work on that in my mind. May 29 13 03:57 am Link Yes please my friend. May 29 13 04:14 am Link Hi, please please please tell me what you think my rate should be! I've got a few photographers waiting on an answer.. I want to give then an apropriate answer. I'm 18 but I actually need some help! Xo May 29 13 06:05 am Link Jorge Kreimer wrote: Jorge: May 29 13 08:50 am Link Neron Maynard wrote: You have an awesome figure - but i Would like to see a few more pictures in your port. How about TFCD for now. May 29 13 08:52 am Link Tell me what I ought to charge! May 29 13 09:29 am Link I'm also interested to hear what you think? May 29 13 09:37 am Link Henry Westheim wrote: Henry: May 29 13 12:18 pm Link Maegan Rose wrote: Maegan: May 29 13 12:21 pm Link Ivan McClellan wrote: Nice port Ivan - Loved this one: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32759455 May 29 13 12:23 pm Link Let me know what you think... May 29 13 12:30 pm Link Dan Brady wrote: Mr. Brady: May 29 13 12:34 pm Link Sarah September wrote: Sarah, Sarah..so easy to look at, so hard to define!! May 29 13 12:37 pm Link Okay, I will hear you out. May 29 13 12:43 pm Link Digital Blitz wrote: wooooah thanks man! May 29 13 06:39 pm Link Hit me May 29 13 06:45 pm Link Digital Blitz wrote: Certainly would be interested in my photography page also. May 29 13 06:49 pm Link sure, i'm still a little new but i'm game. May 29 13 07:03 pm Link Solus wrote: Fine art at its finest. Your website is an experience. This picture is a dream: http://www.michaelculhane.ie/portfolio/#prettyPhoto[gallery]/32/ May 30 13 04:04 pm Link michael mabee wrote: Mike: May 30 13 04:07 pm Link If you're still going, what say ye?? May 30 13 04:08 pm Link Samantha Ashley Mathias wrote: An 11" bust - you got to get your facts right! I am gonna to say TFCD only. May 30 13 04:09 pm Link sure u have alot more on my fb [hotopage if you wish to look at them May 30 13 04:16 pm Link This is a fun thread and there are no harm in games. Just remember that photography is not an hourly industry. Commercial work is billed by the service and product delivered. Factors such as experience, time put into each job are naturally counter intuitive. (i.e. Consider the commercial/celebrity/advertising photographer with significant experience who can setup, shoot, and exit a studio or location in the time it takes a less experienced photographer to do the same.) The value of what one should be paid is largely dependent upon the perceived value of the photographs (the product) being generated. An image of a commercial item that when sold stands to create no insignificant revenue for a client is worth more than an image that only a few may have a passing interest in. Again with sentimental photography (weddings, babies, seniors, etc.) the value is whatever those moments are perceived to be valued at. With the latter, this is why sales play such an integral part of the process, the photographer is convincing the parent (buyer) that this moment will never come again, etc., etc. Remember that when determining our base rates (the cheapest we are able to charge and not dip into the red): we should all be calculating our individual 'Cost of Doing Business' and basing the absolute minimum we are able to charge per day off of this number. If we charge hourly, even a job that pays $175/hour (Awesome right??!!!) may mean leaving considerable revenue on the table because that job may actually be worth $4,500 (a number that a client has paid before for similar work and likely won't flinch at) ...but you're accepting $1,050. End 'Food For Thought' and we return you to your regularly scheduled thread. Happy shooting!!May 30 13 04:28 pm Link hope i'm not too late to the party. May 30 13 05:14 pm Link TonyDee12 wrote: Tony you seem to have everything - good looks, awesome figure, and a famous clientele with contacts, the only thing I could probably holding you back is a complete professional looking portfolio. May 30 13 06:55 pm Link Maegan M wrote: Maegan: May 30 13 06:58 pm Link |
