Sep 30 12 06:53 pm Link
Indianapolis, Indiana, US
I'm assuming the bottom image is the retouched one? There really isn't much of a difference IMO
Oct 03 12 03:21 pm Link
Phylicia Haartje wrote:
maybe it doesn't show up as well on the internet but i changed
Oct 06 12 09:12 am Link
Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
There's a difference even if its a subtle one but you can see it - its definitely cleaner and a helluva lot nicer
Oct 08 12 09:37 pm Link
Orlando, Florida, US
Her soles are dirty. I would address that my eyes go straight to that.
Oct 08 12 10:25 pm Link
Olney, Maryland, US
I like her freckles better.
Oct 08 12 10:39 pm Link
Boston, Massachusetts, US
I like the subtle change. You didnt over-do it in my opinion which is great.
Oct 09 12 12:57 am Link
Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom
I may have dodged a little more under the eyes, but I agree that less can be more. Your treatment of the white-out background is a little brutal though.
Oct 09 12 11:41 am Link
London, England, United Kingdom
What is that black spot you left next to her arm? It's distracting. And white highlight makes her arm disappear.Also I feel everything is just wrong, because my eyes after quick look at all photo goes straight away to her dirty, smudgy feet with too blank white background.
I think you've done nice d&b but I can tell because photo is too small.
Oct 09 12 01:04 pm Link
Lynchburg, Virginia, US
I would play with the lighting to bring the face forward a bit more (this is starting with your edited version) ...
Oct 13 12 07:07 pm Link