Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > Oh, So THAT'S What 'Implied Nude' Means

Photographer

NothingIsRealButTheGirl

Posts: 33594

Los Angeles, California, US

http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/11/elbow.jpg


Facebook Removes Photograph of Woman Showing an Elbow

http://www.petapixel.com/2012/11/25/fac … -an-elbow/

Nov 25 12 02:17 pm Link

Photographer

NothingIsRealButTheGirl

Posts: 33594

Los Angeles, California, US

http://i.imgur.com/ws2BE.jpg

Nov 25 12 09:28 pm Link

guide forum

Photographer

-JAY-

Posts: 6710

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

[removed for linking 18+ images]








just waiting for it.

Nov 25 12 09:33 pm Link

Photographer

R80

Posts: 2602

Marceline, Missouri, US

Yep, that's an elbow.  I guess we can now assume that Facebook doesn't know their ass from a hole in the ground.


Is this under Sharia Law?

Nov 25 12 09:45 pm Link

Photographer

GK photo

Posts: 28094

Laguna Beach, California, US

i think they have an aversion to bubbles.

Nov 25 12 09:53 pm Link

Model

K I C K H A M

Posts: 14636

Los Angeles, California, US

Hahaha. Amazing.

Nov 25 12 09:54 pm Link

Photographer

Art Silva

Posts: 9461

Santa Barbara, California, US

Maybe it's "implied elbow"  wink

Nov 25 12 10:47 pm Link

Photographer

Lawrence Guy

Posts: 17683

Spring Valley, California, US

Elbow or not, I'd still fap to it.

Nov 26 12 04:59 pm Link

Makeup Artist

Rock Victorian

Posts: 142

Norfolk, Virginia, US

Naughty bits, now including elbows!


Whaaaat?

Nov 26 12 05:05 pm Link

Model

Sophia Be

Posts: 6354

Portland, Oregon, US

lol

If that's not an elbow, she has some weird boobies

Facebook is ridiculous. They removed one of my barbie pics. Funny cause barbie doesn't even have bits and I was wearing bottoms when the shot was taken. They are really over the top

Nov 26 12 05:06 pm Link

Photographer

Lawrence Guy

Posts: 17683

Spring Valley, California, US

Sophia Be wrote:
If that's not an elbow, she has some weird boobies

And no arms.

Giggity!

Nov 26 12 05:10 pm Link

guide forum

Model

Damianne

Posts: 15975

Austin, Texas, US

the Facebook censorship is outsourced.

Obviously much of it is lazily done.

Nov 26 12 06:10 pm Link

Photographer

Bubble77

Posts: 10706

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

GK photo wrote:
i think they have an aversion to bubbles.

I *knew* they were out to get me!!!  I knew it!!

Nov 26 12 07:14 pm Link

Model

Julia Francesca

Posts: 2365

Maumee, Ohio, US

this is freaking awesome.

Nov 26 12 08:27 pm Link

Photographer

figurativearts

Posts: 5723

Cottonwood, Arizona, US

are her elbows real or augmented?

Nov 26 12 08:29 pm Link

Photographer

Blissful Normality

Posts: 116

Portland, Oregon, US

I had FB remove a photo of my fully clothed child. They are idiots.

Nov 26 12 08:32 pm Link

Photographer

John Photography

Posts: 12979

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Facebook removed pictures of a girl in a bikini lying on wet sand that I had taken at a beach...

What the flap is wrong with bikini photos?

Nov 26 12 09:22 pm Link

Model

Alicia Hansen

Posts: 1744

Durango, Colorado, US

Oh geez. lol

Nov 26 12 10:54 pm Link

Photographer

T J Khamas

Posts: 354

Carrigaline, Cork, Ireland

NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/ws2BE.jpg

Are those elbows have nipples on them? Hence the confusion:)

Nov 26 12 11:14 pm Link

Photographer

Glamour by Glenn

Posts: 978

Nashville, Tennessee, US

Lol, Model Mayhem put up the red banner and removed my avatar that showed absolutely nothing whatsoever. I put black bars over the naughty parts, but under the black bars the model had on a bikini.

Nov 27 12 12:21 am Link

Photographer

Art Silva

Posts: 9461

Santa Barbara, California, US

... I removed Facebook, now There, haha.

Nov 27 12 07:25 am Link

Photographer

Eastfist

Posts: 3544

Green Bay, Wisconsin, US

Their nudity detection software is so advanced, yet so not advanced.  You can put up a photo of your hairy armpit crease and it would censor it.

Nov 27 12 12:10 pm Link

Model

Christina Josephine

Posts: 121

Warsaw, Indiana, US

Seriously though- at first glance definitely looks like inflatable tots.

Nov 27 12 03:22 pm Link

Model

Russian Katarina II

Posts: 2515

London, England, United Kingdom

Damianne wrote:
the Facebook censorship is outsourced.

Obviously much of it is lazily done.

They look pretty busy to me.

http://niblick.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/india_call_center_3.jpg

http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200708/r172892_652450.jpg

Except that guy in red in the middle who has left his workplace to schmooze a female colleague. But he will rightfully be flogged by the supervisor during lunch break, so it's all good.

Nov 27 12 03:28 pm Link

Photographer

Art Silva

Posts: 9461

Santa Barbara, California, US

Eastfist wrote:
Their nudity detection software is so advanced, yet so not advanced.  You can put up a photo of your hairy armpit crease and it would censor it.

So if I put up a picture of the family hairless kitty, will it get censored to?

hmm

Nov 27 12 03:42 pm Link

Photographer

John Photography

Posts: 12979

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Katarina N. wrote:

They look pretty busy to me.

http://niblick.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/india_call_center_3.jpg

http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200708/r172892_652450.jpg

Except that guy in red in the middle who has left his workplace to schmooze a female colleague. But he will rightfully be flogged by the supervisor during lunch break, so it's all good.

Wow India by the look of it.... No wonder the censorship is sketchy.

Nov 28 12 06:10 pm Link

Photographer

John Photography

Posts: 12979

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote:
http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/11/elbow.jpg


Facebook Removes Photograph of Woman Showing an Elbow

http://www.petapixel.com/2012/11/25/fac … -an-elbow/

The girl looks like someone I often use.....For photographs

Dec 03 12 08:34 pm Link