Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > Cell phone pics and All around Crappy Ports....

Photographer

Digital Grace Photog

Posts: 3

Columbus, Ohio, US

I'm going for the record for most negative comments in a single topic.  I know there is a lot of goof balls out there that complain about a topic no matter what it is.  They have no common sense and try to make themselves feel better by putting other's down.  Here it goes: Why the hell are you posting cell phone pics and all around noisy, dark, crappy, unedited images as part of your port.  Really?  How disrespectful, on top of that you want to get paid how much to do a shoot with that kind of port.  You shouldn't get paid $5/hour let alone $50 to $100/hour to do a paid shoot.  No matter if it's nude or not.  You want to get paid to do a shoot, then set up a port worthy of getting paid for.  Something that shows your at the very least a little professional. 

            Which leads me to my next point:  Just because you can get naked doesn't mean you should and most definitively don't post them as part of your profile.  I am not the best or most talented photographer and I know that but I do have a port that is somewhat decent.  At least I have put an effort into making my port look good.  I would say it's in the top 40% of all photographer portfolio's on MM.  I am not a great editor, although I do dabble a little and I don't have boats load of money to pay people to properly edit my images.  I have seen some amazing images and really awesome photographer's on here and find it disrespectful when someone don't take the time to put forth a proper effort in creating a decent port.

              There are so many photographer's that are willing to shoot for free there's no reason to post cell phone pics or images that are noisy, dark, and all around look bad.  If your a photographer doing this, then shame on you.  Take a little pride in your work and do some editing before posting.  You don't have to be a professional to have a decent port, you can just be doing this for fun and still look good.  Enough Said!!!

Dec 02 12 10:46 am Link

Model

Bunny Bombshell

Posts: 11752

Huntington, West Virginia, US

Even though I agree with the sentiment of your post, you're not telling us anything most of us don't already know

Dec 02 12 10:49 am Link

Model

DivaEroticus

Posts: 14716

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

Digital Grace Photog wrote:
I'm going for the record for most negative comments in a single topic.  I know there is a lot of goof balls out there that complain about a topic no matter what it is.  They have no common sense and try to make themselves feel better by putting other's down.  Here it goes: Why the hell are you posting cell phone pics and all around noisy, dark, crappy, unedited images as part of your port.  Really?  How disrespectful, on top of that you want to get paid how much to do a shoot with that kind of port.  You shouldn't get paid $5/hour let alone $50 to $100/hour to do a paid shoot.  No matter if it's nude or not.  You want to get paid to do a shoot, then set up a port worthy of getting paid for.  Something that shows your at the very least a little professional. 

            Which leads me to my next point:  Just because you can get naked doesn't mean you should and most definitively don't post them as part of your profile.  I am not the best or most talented photographer and I know that but I do have a port that is somewhat decent.  At least I have put an effort into making my port look good.  I would say it's in the top 40% of all photographer portfolio's on MM.  I am not a great editor, although I do dabble a little and I don't have boats load of money to pay people to properly edit my images.  I have seen some amazing images and really awesome photographer's on here and find it disrespectful when someone don't take the time to put forth a proper effort in creating a decent port.

              There are so many photographer's that are willing to shoot for free there's no reason to post cell phone pics or images that are noisy, dark, and all around look bad.  If your a photographer doing this, then shame on you.  Take a little pride in your work and do some editing before posting.  You don't have to be a professional to have a decent port, you can just be doing this for fun and still look good.  Enough Said!!!

Cool story, bro.

The same could be said for too much post work  :shrug:

Meat to one, is poison to another.

Dec 02 12 10:51 am Link

Model

Ashley Riot

Posts: 120

Chicago, Illinois, US

Post hidden on Dec 02, 2012 11:29 am
Reason: other
Comments:
unsolicited critique

Dec 02 12 11:00 am Link

Photographer

Good Egg Productions

Posts: 15708

Orlando, Florida, US

Best first post EVAR!

Dec 02 12 11:02 am Link

Model

DivaEroticus

Posts: 14716

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

Post hidden on Dec 02, 2012 11:30 am
Reason: other
Comments:
quotes hidden post

Dec 02 12 11:03 am Link

Model

DivaEroticus

Posts: 14716

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

Good Egg Productions wrote:
Best first post EVAR!

inorite?!  lol







IBTL

Dec 02 12 11:03 am Link

Photographer

Photos 4 The Memories

Posts: 1287

Kewaskum, Wisconsin, US

Well here is a post about the same thing. Also IBTL
http://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?threa … st17203107

Dec 02 12 11:05 am Link

Photographer

SPRINGHEEL

Posts: 38195

Gibraltar, Michigan, US

That's nice dear

Dec 02 12 11:14 am Link

Photographer

Tog

Posts: 55204

Birmingham, Alabama, US

1) Rinse.

Dec 02 12 11:17 am Link

Photographer

Tog

Posts: 55204

Birmingham, Alabama, US

2) Repeat.

Dec 02 12 11:17 am Link

Photographer

Dan K Photography

Posts: 5466

STATEN ISLAND, New York, US

Digital Grace Photog wrote:
Which leads me to my next point:  Just because you can get naked doesn't mean you should and most definitively don't post them as part of your profile.  I am not the best or most talented photographer and I know that but I do have a port that is somewhat decent.  At least I have put an effort into making my port look good.  I would say it's in the top 40% of all photographer portfolio's on MM.

Yeah, the thing is all those people whos ports you are making fun of think that they have a port that is somewhat decent and is in the top 40% of all ports on MM.

Dec 02 12 11:18 am Link

Photographer

GK photo

Posts: 28071

Laguna Beach, California, US

Good Egg Productions wrote:
Best first post EVAR!

hey, at least it wasn't spam, or a vote for me. smile

Dec 02 12 12:11 pm Link

Model

P I X I E

Posts: 35327

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

http://images4.fanpop.com/image/photos/22000000/Super-Cool-Story-Bro-super-mario-bros-22074555-600-562.jpg

Dec 02 12 12:11 pm Link

Photographer

Gianantonio

Posts: 8039

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

Digital Grace Photog wrote:
I'm going for the record for most negative comments in a single topic.  I know there is a lot of goof balls out there that complain about a topic no matter what it is.  They have no common sense and try to make themselves feel better by putting other's down.  Here it goes: Why the hell are you posting cell phone pics and all around noisy, dark, crappy, unedited images as part of your port.  Really?  How disrespectful, on top of that you want to get paid how much to do a shoot with that kind of port.  You shouldn't get paid $5/hour let alone $50 to $100/hour to do a paid shoot.  No matter if it's nude or not.  You want to get paid to do a shoot, then set up a port worthy of getting paid for.  Something that shows your at the very least a little professional. 

            Which leads me to my next point:  Just because you can get naked doesn't mean you should and most definitively don't post them as part of your profile.  I am not the best or most talented photographer and I know that but I do have a port that is somewhat decent.  At least I have put an effort into making my port look good.  I would say it's in the top 40% of all photographer portfolio's on MM.  I am not a great editor, although I do dabble a little and I don't have boats load of money to pay people to properly edit my images.  I have seen some amazing images and really awesome photographer's on here and find it disrespectful when someone don't take the time to put forth a proper effort in creating a decent port.

              There are so many photographer's that are willing to shoot for free there's no reason to post cell phone pics or images that are noisy, dark, and all around look bad.  If your a photographer doing this, then shame on you.  Take a little pride in your work and do some editing before posting.  You don't have to be a professional to have a decent port, you can just be doing this for fun and still look good.  Enough Said!!!

I think if you understood what art is, you wouldn't have posted your OP...

Dec 02 12 12:17 pm Link

Model

P I X I E

Posts: 35327

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

I was going to say something... But then it would be an unsolicited critique.

Dec 02 12 12:25 pm Link

Photographer

Looknsee Photography

Posts: 21658

Portland, Oregon, US

Congratulations on your first forum post.

Digital Grace Photog wrote:
Why the hell are you posting cell phone pics and all around noisy, dark, crappy, unedited images as part of your port.

This is nothing wrong with cell phone pictures.  They can be fun, spontaneous, and aesthetically pleasing.  Sure, there are technical quality limitations, but I would rather look at an interesting picture than a boring but technically perfect picture.  Aesthetics are more important than technology.

When I went to school, back in the dark (pre-digital) ages, ...
...  Beginning students learned basic exposure & darkroom on film SLRs,
...  Intermediate students learned the Zone System & advance darkroom
     techniques with 4x5 view cameras, and
...  Advanced students were given a $5, all plastic Diana camera with fixed
     focus, 4 exposure settings, and typically some light leaks.

So, stop being snobby.  The camera is a tool, and a great photographer is an artist.


Digital Grace Photog wrote:
You shouldn't get paid $5/hour let alone $50 to $100/hour to do a paid shoot.  No matter if it's nude or not.  You want to get paid to do a shoot, then set up a port worthy of getting paid for.  Something that shows your at the very least a little professional.

You don't get to decide who gets paid and who doesn't; you only get to decide whether you want to pay them or not.  But if they are getting people to pay them $500 an hour, more power to them.  If they aren't getting any job offers, they'll figure it out.  You don't have to inflict us with your prejudices.


Digital Grace Photog wrote:
Which leads me to my next point:  Just because you can get naked doesn't mean you should and most definitively don't post them as part of your profile.

That looks like the same point -- at least, the answer is the same.  If a model gets work posing nude, more power to them; if not, not.  You only get to decide whether you want to hire them.  Anything else is none of your business. 

Also, there  are hobbyists on this site, many of whom don't care whether they get paid.  Leave room for them to exist.


Digital Grace Photog wrote:
There are so many photographer's that are willing to shoot for free there's no reason to post cell phone pics or images that are noisy, dark, and all around look bad.  If your a photographer doing this, then shame on you.

Shame on you for offering an unsolicited critique.  People get to decide what they want to put into their portfolios, not you.

Dec 02 12 12:26 pm Link

Photographer

Photos 4 The Memories

Posts: 1287

Kewaskum, Wisconsin, US

I think the OP needs a mercy lock.

Dec 02 12 12:30 pm Link

Photographer

Kev Lawson

Posts: 7844

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Photos 4 The Memories  wrote:
I think the OP needs a mercy lock.

nooooo... i like reading how others feel on his issues smile

Dec 02 12 12:32 pm Link

Photographer

In Balance Photography

Posts: 3372

Boston, Massachusetts, US

Digital Grace Photog wrote:
I'm going for the record for most negative comments in a single topic....

Need attention?

Dec 02 12 12:39 pm Link

Model

The Matthew Ross

Posts: 2705

Tulsa, Oklahoma, US

Looknsee Photography wrote:
Congratulations on your first forum post.

Digital Grace Photog wrote:
Why the hell are you posting cell phone pics and all around noisy, dark, crappy, unedited images as part of your port.

This is nothing wrong with cell phone pictures.  They can be fun, spontaneous, and aesthetically pleasing.  Sure, there are technical quality limitations, but I would rather look at an interesting picture than a boring but technically perfect picture.  Aesthetics are more important than technology.

When I went to school, back in the dark (pre-digital) ages, ...
...  Beginning students learned basic exposure & darkroom on film SLRs,
...  Intermediate students learned the Zone System & advance darkroom
     techniques with 4x5 view cameras, and
...  Advanced students were given a $5, all plastic Diana camera with fixed
     focus, 4 exposure settings, and typically some light leaks.

So, stop being snobby.  The camera is a tool, and a great photographer is an artist.


Digital Grace Photog wrote:
You shouldn't get paid $5/hour let alone $50 to $100/hour to do a paid shoot.  No matter if it's nude or not.  You want to get paid to do a shoot, then set up a port worthy of getting paid for.  Something that shows your at the very least a little professional.

You don't get to decide who gets paid and who doesn't; you only get to decide whether you want to pay them or not.  But if they are getting people to pay them $500 an hour, more power to them.  If they aren't getting any job offers, they'll figure it out.  You don't have to inflict us with your prejudices.


Digital Grace Photog wrote:
Which leads me to my next point:  Just because you can get naked doesn't mean you should and most definitively don't post them as part of your profile.

That looks like the same point -- at least, the answer is the same.  If a model gets work posing nude, more power to them; if not, not.  You only get to decide whether you want to hire them.  Anything else is none of your business. 

Also, there  are hobbyists on this site, many of whom don't care whether they get paid.  Leave room for them to exist.



Shame on you for offering an unsolicited critique.  People get to decide what they want to put into their portfolios, not you.

+1

And an Internet hug.

Dec 02 12 12:40 pm Link

Model

DivaEroticus

Posts: 14716

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

In Balance Photography wrote:
Need attention?

Apparently.  He's posted one post, and hasn't been back.  LOLOL

Obvious new http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg is obvious.

Dec 02 12 12:48 pm Link

Photographer

Photos 4 The Memories

Posts: 1287

Kewaskum, Wisconsin, US

DivaEroticus wrote:
Apparently.  He's posted one post, and hasn't been back.  LOLOL

Obvious new http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg is obvious.

Or could be scared but I think you are right.

Dec 02 12 12:50 pm Link

Model

a raw muse

Posts: 3196

Amundsen-Scott - permanent station of the US, Unclaimed Sector, Antarctica

neutral

Dec 02 12 12:51 pm Link

Photographer

Orca Bay Images

Posts: 32233

Woodinville, Washington, US

Photos 4 The Memories  wrote:
Or could be scared but I think you are right.

He may be confounded by that new tag on his profile.

Dec 02 12 12:59 pm Link

Model

DivaEroticus

Posts: 14716

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

Orca Bay Images wrote:

He may be confounded by that new tag on his profile.

There is that.

Dec 02 12 01:11 pm Link

Model

P I X I E

Posts: 35327

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Orca Bay Images wrote:

He may be confounded by that new tag on his profile.

Most delicious! big_smile

Dec 02 12 01:12 pm Link

Photographer

Kev Lawson

Posts: 7844

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Orca Bay Images wrote:

He may be confounded by that new tag on his profile.

ouch!

Dec 02 12 01:13 pm Link

Model

Bunny Bombshell

Posts: 11752

Huntington, West Virginia, US

Obviously, I responded before I actually saw his port... No words

Dec 02 12 01:27 pm Link

Photographer

SPRINGHEEL

Posts: 38195

Gibraltar, Michigan, US

Poor fella

Dec 02 12 01:40 pm Link

Model

DivaEroticus

Posts: 14716

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

Ms Selina K wrote:
Obviously, I responded before I actually saw his port... No words

w0rd.  :nodding:

Dec 02 12 01:40 pm Link

Photographer

Orca Bay Images

Posts: 32233

Woodinville, Washington, US

SPRINGHEEL  wrote:
Poor fella

lol

Dec 02 12 01:50 pm Link

Photographer

intense_puppy

Posts: 864

Brighton, England, United Kingdom

Digital Grace Photog wrote:
Enough Said!!!

You're unhappy, aren't you?

Dec 02 12 01:51 pm Link

Makeup Artist

meower

Posts: 36

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

I only have crappy phone pictures to put up, had my first one hour shoot yesterday. ;p

Dec 02 12 01:53 pm Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 36707

Columbus, Ohio, US

Tog wrote:
1) Rinse.

Tog wrote:
2) Repeat.

Don't forget dry.

Dec 02 12 01:57 pm Link

Model

Sirensong

Posts: 2173

Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom

Dear OP..

Trolling is bad M'kay?

Dec 02 12 02:10 pm Link

Photographer

John Sweet

Posts: 190

Denver, Colorado, US

If people in the bottom 60% put in more work, you might not be in the top 40% any more.

Do you really want that?

You should be encouraging people to work less, post more cell phone pics, and suck more.

That way, you might make it to the top 30%.

Dec 02 12 04:31 pm Link

Photographer

Kev Lawson

Posts: 7844

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Orca Bay Images wrote:
He may be confounded by that new tag on his profile.

the tag is gone now... oh well

Dec 02 12 06:24 pm Link

Photographer

Aaron Lewis Photography

Posts: 5083

Catskill, New York, US

In the OP's defence, he has been bottling up his anger and self confidence issues for more than a year now.

Someone please share the missing tag with the group smile

Dec 02 12 07:08 pm Link

Model

Autumn Rose Brightly

Posts: 1097

Crowley, Texas, US

You sound like you need a hug and a drink

Dec 02 12 07:14 pm Link