The opinion was "unnatural and plastic", so I want to know what do you think about this retouched photo.
Thanks for your time!
Dec 24 12 01:45 am Link
Columbus, Ohio, US
I don't necessarily think it looks "plastic" (maybe a bit on the forehead though)
Dec 25 12 06:35 pm Link
Paul Snyder wrote:
Was an attempt for an editorial... maybe is "over done" for this.
Dec 26 12 01:06 am Link
Temple City, California, US
Its a soft touch I like it White is always hard to work on.
Dec 26 12 01:18 am Link
East Newark, New Jersey, US
It looks plastic to me also as if a filter was applied. I like the original better. Editorial aren't overdone if you look around unless the photographer wants it that way but usually from what I have seen/experienced it isn't the case.
Dec 29 12 11:06 am Link
El Paso, Texas, US
The face has an unnatural plasticy look, yes. I do like the contrast adjustment and background lightening though. The hair I liked better on the original.
I think the face was moving in the right direction, moles, under-eye lines, forehead lines, etc. I just think it went too far with the face retouching.
Dec 29 12 11:21 am Link
I was given a reference http://i49.tinypic.com/2m6jpjb.jpg ... so I tried it ... I know that I don't made a good job. My mistake.
Thanks for your help!
Dec 29 12 12:24 pm Link
West Hollywood, California, US
Some people like that look, I personally would like to see something in between the two of them. Also the eyes are very dark.
Dec 29 12 10:54 pm Link
Denver, Colorado, US
I like to keep men a little rougher, people kind of expect it.
Dec 30 12 08:25 pm Link