Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > Kate, a different perspective!

Photographer

London Fog

Posts: 6770

London, England, United Kingdom

Thought another thread was needed to fully explore Kate from all angles!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v690/AA777/KateStudio_zps37f4f367.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v690/AA777/KateSideViews_zpsd6b96005.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v690/AA777/KateMagSpread_zpsb0123d54.jpg

I'd say it clearly shows that the SI front cover is a bodge job!

Feb 15 13 10:55 am Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37119

Columbus, Ohio, US

London Fog wrote:
Thought another thread was needed to fully explore Kate from all angles!

I'd say it clearly shows that the SI front cover is a bodge job!

Market whatever you're smoking, it must be good shit and could make you a lot of $$$. smile

Feb 15 13 11:21 am Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37119

Columbus, Ohio, US

what the HELL is wrong with the forums......cmon MM, just jump off a cliff.

Feb 15 13 11:21 am Link

Photographer

K E E L I N G

Posts: 39862

Peoria, Illinois, US

No convincing needed here, she's stunningly beautiful with a ton of personality.

Feb 15 13 11:24 am Link

Photographer

jesse paulk

Posts: 3712

Phoenix, Arizona, US

enough with her boobs jesus


you know she is a person, a human being


with a butt, that isn't getting any attention

Feb 15 13 11:34 am Link

Photographer

London Fog

Posts: 6770

London, England, United Kingdom

jesse paulk wrote:
enough with her boobs jesus


you know she is a person, a human being


with a butt, that isn't getting any attention

I bet it is!

Feb 15 13 11:57 am Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37119

Columbus, Ohio, US

jesse paulk wrote:
enough with her boobs jesus


you know she is a person, a human being


with a butt, that isn't getting any attention

lol

Feb 15 13 12:23 pm Link

Model

-Nicole-

Posts: 19211

Madison, Wisconsin, US

So what if it is?

Not like boobs being enhanced by photoshop is unheard of...

Feb 15 13 01:02 pm Link

Photographer

J O H N A L L A N

Posts: 10772

San Pedro, California, US

-Nicole- wrote:
So what if it is?

Not like boobs being enhanced by photoshop is unheard of...

But they aren't in the picture - she's just pushing them together slightly with her arms.

Feb 15 13 01:08 pm Link

Photographer

WIP

Posts: 15749

Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom

I wouldn't throw her out of bed.

Feb 15 13 01:12 pm Link

Model

-Nicole-

Posts: 19211

Madison, Wisconsin, US

John Allan wrote:

But they aren't in the picture - she's just pushing them together slightly with her arms.

I know.

Feb 15 13 01:20 pm Link

Photographer

Digitoxin

Posts: 13345

Houston, Texas, US

K E E L I N G wrote:
No convincing needed here, she's stunningly beautiful with a ton of personality.

Agreed.

She would be fun to have a beer with.  My guess:  a smart, savvy, fun, young woman.

Feb 15 13 03:41 pm Link

Model

angel emily

Posts: 1020

Boston, Massachusetts, US

She looks about 20 lbs heavier on the SI cover and inside.

http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/y7HyT5XjrzW_aTqD2Pf1SQ--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTMwMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/blogs/omgcelebnews/300-kate-upton-jpg_193301.jpg

Just an observation, no judgement.

I think she's awfully pretty. smile

Feb 15 13 03:44 pm Link

Photographer

Andialu

Posts: 14029

San Pedro, California, US

e m i l y wrote:
She looks about 20 lbs heavier on the SI cover and inside.

http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/y7HyT5XjrzW_aTqD2Pf1SQ--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTMwMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/blogs/omgcelebnews/300-kate-upton-jpg_193301.jpg

Heaven forbid, a model that doesn't look like stick figure.

Feb 15 13 03:47 pm Link

Model

Cait Chan

Posts: 6272

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

http://www.rsvlts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Kate-Upton-Sports-Illustrated-Antarctia-Photo-01.jpg

/thread

Feb 15 13 03:51 pm Link

Model

Kaley King

Posts: 1027

Jefferson City, Missouri, US

e m i l y wrote:
She looks about 20 lbs heavier on the SI cover and inside.

http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/y7HyT5XjrzW_aTqD2Pf1SQ--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTMwMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/blogs/omgcelebnews/300-kate-upton-jpg_193301.jpg

Just an observation, no judgement.

I think she's awfully pretty. smile

I like that she looks...full.  Her face looks real, not skeleton like.

Feb 15 13 03:52 pm Link

Photographer

Brooklyn Bridge Images

Posts: 10361

Brooklyn, New York, US

e m i l y wrote:
She looks about 20 lbs heavier on the SI cover and inside.

I concur she looks heavier than last years issue
...all the more to luv
Look at the videos
Body looks same as photos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_UfuVowYXk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxZOXGyEorw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDpHexThZcQ

Feb 15 13 03:58 pm Link

Model

Cait Chan

Posts: 6272

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

Op, are you aware of the fact that women's breasts fluctuate? ALOT?

She's probably like me where any weight gained or lost is mostly in the chestal area.

Feb 15 13 04:04 pm Link

Model

Galas

Posts: 1273

Atlanta, Georgia, US

c_h_r_i_s wrote:
I wouldn't throw her out of bed.

Unless she wanted to freak on the floor.

Feb 15 13 04:34 pm Link

Photographer

London Fog

Posts: 6770

London, England, United Kingdom

Cait Chan wrote:
Op, are you aware of the fact that women's breasts fluctuate? ALOT?

She's probably like me where any weight gained or lost is mostly in the chestal area.

Yes, but not 3 times the size of your head, it's just not possible!

Feb 15 13 05:09 pm Link

Model

Nemi

Posts: 27413

Jamaica, New York, US

London Fog wrote:

Yes, but not 3 times the size of your head, it's just not possible!

Yes, yes it is.

Feb 15 13 06:04 pm Link

Model

Jules NYC

Posts: 17192

New York, New York, US

If it's not her tits, people are complaining about her stomach.

She's not a silverscreen star in the looks department but she's on the cover as a swimsuit model.
Good for her.

One if my friends (who is overweight) was knocking on her stomach herself.
Swimsuit is tough even if you're thin.

On that note, everyone is a critic so it seems ha.

Feb 15 13 06:30 pm Link

Photographer

Brooklyn Bridge Images

Posts: 10361

Brooklyn, New York, US

Jules NYC wrote:
If it's not her tits, people are complaining about her stomach.

Actually I have seen fashionista  types saying her bust is too big
Curvy is bad in to some

Feb 15 13 06:34 pm Link

Model

Jules NYC

Posts: 17192

New York, New York, US

Brooklyn Bridge Images wrote:
Actually I have seen fashionista  types saying her bust is too big
Curvy is bad in to some

Fashion-types usually don't have big breasts but that doesn't mean they always have nothing either lol.
I think most criticize for a few basic reasons, jealousy and envy being the majority of it all.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion though.
The best critics are the ones that 'do'.

Everyone has a different body type and that's ok.
smile

Feb 15 13 06:55 pm Link

Photographer

Docta Shock Photografix

Posts: 1729

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

London Fog wrote:

Yes, but not 3 times the size of your head, it's just not possible!

Really?

Feb 15 13 06:57 pm Link

guide forum

Photographer

Giacomo Cirrincioni

Posts: 21544

New York, New York, US

London Fog wrote:
Yes, but not 3 times the size of your head, it's just not possible!

Docta Shock Photografix wrote:
Really?

For Nemi?  Absofreakinglutely.

The words "real" and "spectacular" come to mind...

Feb 15 13 07:00 pm Link

Model

Jules NYC

Posts: 17192

New York, New York, US

Docta Shock Photografix wrote:

Really?

lol

This is a touché moment.

PS, I can tell on an iPhone without opening up the profile, the model you shot is natural.

Feb 15 13 07:05 pm Link

Photographer

RacerXPhoto

Posts: 2492

Brooklyn, New York, US

Docta Shock Photografix wrote:

Really?

borat

Feb 15 13 07:06 pm Link

Photographer

RacerXPhoto

Posts: 2492

Brooklyn, New York, US

Feb 15 13 07:07 pm Link

Model

Nemi

Posts: 27413

Jamaica, New York, US

Paramour Productions wrote:

London Fog wrote:
Yes, but not 3 times the size of your head, it's just not possible!

For Nemi?  Absofreakinglutely.

The words "real" and "spectacular" come to mind...

lol

Feb 15 13 08:42 pm Link

Photographer

Shon D.- Homme

Posts: 3210

Virginia Beach, Virginia, US

Jules NYC wrote:
If it's not her tits, people are complaining about her stomach.

She's not a silverscreen star in the looks department but she's on the cover as a swimsuit model.
Good for her.

One if my friends (who is overweight) was knocking on her stomach herself.
Swimsuit is tough even if you're thin.

On that note, everyone is a critic so it seems ha.

She's a model. Models are critiqued on their looks for a living, so I mean...

I guess I should be shocked that people critique chefs' cooking or singers' singing...

Feb 15 13 08:55 pm Link

Model

DEACTIVATED ACCOUNT

Posts: 1294

Čaġčarān, Ġawr, Afghanistan

Edit: I take it all back, it was another model called Kate I believe... Regardless, my apologies. Carry on smile

Edit edit: it wasn't even another Kate, it was Lara Bingle! I'm literally taking crazy pills. http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebri … 263x9.html

Feb 15 13 09:03 pm Link

Model

Kaley King

Posts: 1027

Jefferson City, Missouri, US

Shon D.- Homme wrote:

She's a model. Model's are critiqued on their looks for a living, so I mean...

I guess I should be shocked that people critique chefs' cooking or singers' singing...

It's one thing to critique someone for being bad...it's another to critique someone for being different.

Feb 15 13 09:16 pm Link

Photographer

Shon D.- Homme

Posts: 3210

Virginia Beach, Virginia, US

La Lana  wrote:

It's one thing to critique someone for being bad...it's another to critique someone for being different.

Well, she's both in my opinion, now what?

Feb 15 13 09:21 pm Link

Model

Kaley King

Posts: 1027

Jefferson City, Missouri, US

Shon D.- Homme wrote:
Well, she's both in my opinion, now what?

If she is a bad model...she wouldn't be where she is.  I agree with Kate...

Kate says she's in a good place in her career, so it doesn't matter what many think of her.

Read more: http://www.nationalledger.com/pop-cultu … z2L2NVwo4W

She has done a lot better in this business than you, but you are negatively critiquing her...if you were that great you'd be shooting SI covers, but you're not....now what?

Feb 15 13 09:32 pm Link

Photographer

Shon D.- Homme

Posts: 3210

Virginia Beach, Virginia, US

Shon D.- Homme wrote:
Well, she's both in my opinion, now what?

La Lana  wrote:
If she is a bad model...she wouldn't be where she is.  I agree with Kate...

Kate says she's in a good place in her career, so it doesn't matter what many think of her.

Read more: http://www.nationalledger.com/pop-cultu … z2L2NVwo4W

Yeah, so basically, what the real issue is is that you don't want people to criticize her at all. We don't all have to like her. My opinion of her is not based on what other people think of her. I have my own mind. Good for her on her success, but it has nothing to do with my thoughts.

Feb 15 13 09:36 pm Link

Photographer

Shon D.- Homme

Posts: 3210

Virginia Beach, Virginia, US

La Lana  wrote:
She has done a lot better in this business than you, but you are negatively critiquing her...if you were that great you'd be shooting SI covers, but you're not....now what?

She's also done way better than you have, and you're singing her praises. Now what?

Feb 15 13 09:37 pm Link

Model

Kaley King

Posts: 1027

Jefferson City, Missouri, US

Shon D.- Homme wrote:
She's also done way better than you have, and you're singing her praises. Now what?

I am a nude model...not an SI model...

But if I want to praise someone for success....what's your point?

I would never tear down a more successful nude model here bc I don't like her photo...or her body...just because I don't get someone's talent...doesn't mean they are bad.

Feb 15 13 09:38 pm Link

Model

Kaley King

Posts: 1027

Jefferson City, Missouri, US

Shon D.- Homme wrote:

Shon D.- Homme wrote:
Well, she's both in my opinion, now what?

Yeah, so basically, what the real issue is is that you don't want people to criticize her at all. We don't all have to like her. My opinion of her is not based on what other people think of her. I have my own mind. Good for her on her success, but it has nothing to do with my thoughts.

The point is...if she was overall a bad model, she wouldn't be where she is.

Feb 15 13 09:39 pm Link

Photographer

Shon D.- Homme

Posts: 3210

Virginia Beach, Virginia, US

La Lana  wrote:

I am a nude model...not an SI model...

But if I want to praise someone for success....what's your point?

And if I want to voice a dissenting opinion, what's YOUR point?

Feb 15 13 09:40 pm Link