Model
Sharkie Mac
Posts: 133
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
I would greatly appreciate a critique please (trying to improve and narrow port). Would like to know my best, worst and why, as well as any other impressions you have please. Cheers
Model
Krystina Boots
Posts: 5
Lansing, Michigan, US
If you're still posting opinions, I'd love to hear what you have to say. Thanks!
Photographer
Eclectic
Posts: 282
Toledo, Ohio, US
Model with Michael wrote: Passing on this one May I ask why?
Photographer
Faces of Vegas
Posts: 49
Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Model with Michael wrote: Overall your compositions are too tight and your subjects need more negative space. Thank you so much for your input. Appreciate it very much. I'll try and give the girls more space in future. Cheers, tok
Model
DaniNikole
Posts: 129
Sacramento, California, US
Model with Michael wrote: Best: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31972721 This shows off your great form and face. The best pose and composition in your portfolio. The background detracts from you and the lighting is not dramatic enough, but the image shows you off well. Would make a stronger avatar, because it shows your face, hair and figure well. Your current choice is too cliche and doesn't show your abilities well. https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31849273 Also one of your stronger shots. As is this one: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31849271 Worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32010860 Poor lighting, composition and pose. Your arms look very awkward in this position. The background does not contribute positively to the image. The photo is just there and doesn't show off your modeling potential. Close 2nd worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31961814 The background, pose, lighting and composition lack finish. Does not show you as a high end model. Overall you've got a great look with an excellent form and an elegant face. You are missing an exceptional frontal head shot. You seem comfortable and relaxed in front of the camera. What is holding you back is the quality of your photos. Your portfolio would benefit from some really strong impact shots with great makeup and hair, shot by skilled photographers who could show off your assets. Much success, Michael Thanks
Photographer
Norman Ding
Posts: 68
New York, New York, US
love to hear your opinion
Model
Quentin LA Duquenne
Posts: 3
Paris, Île-de-France, France
Can you please check my pics and give me your opinion
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
TBM Artworx photography wrote: any advice would be appreciated. Best: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32165960 Your current avatar, which is artistically and creatively done. However, it does not match the rest of your portfolio. Worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32022781 This is the worst in your port. Good model, but the way it was done it has zero redeeming value. The posing, lighting and composition are that of a snapshot. Nothing professional about it. Overall I would suggest studying more on the art of photography. You need to develop your composition, lighting and posing skills. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Lauren Reynolds MUA wrote: Would value your opinion Best: Your current avatar, because of how it is photographically recorded. The rest of your images are by low skilled photographers, which makes it difficult to impossible to judge the quality of your makeup. If you want to show the quality of your makeup, you need skilled photographers who understand lighting, composition ad posing. You seem to know what you are doing as a makeup artist, but the photographers are not providing you with photos of a quality that show your work. They are more snapshot quality, not professional. As a makeup artist building your portfolio, you are probably doing some trade work. When agreeing to do trade, make sure the photographer understands that s/he is shooting some photos for your portfolio too. Otherwise you haven't gained anything from all of your hard work. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Aoify wrote: Hope you can find something you like. Best: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31943918 Your current avatar is your best photo. It has the best lighting, composition, pose and creative makeup/hair. It shows your modeling potential. Worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31899574 This is shot with too short a lens and is thus distorting your facial features. This should be culled. While it is a good idea to include a good quality headshot, this one doesn't flatter you. Overall I think you need to decide what direction you want to go in with your modeling. As a professional photographer who hires models, I find this photo of you bleeding in the shower very low end and distracting: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31899682 It would cause me to find someone else. You have an excellent look and form. But I would suggest striving to work with more skilled photographers who can bring out your beauty. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Artpho Imaging
Posts: 2965
Fairborn, Ohio, US
About time for me to have some serious critique, hit me up.
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Amelia Rouge wrote: How about me Best: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30780941 This is a very strong headshot in your portfolio, because it has good lighting and lots of emotion. It would have been even stronger, if they hadn't cropped it so tight. Cropping so tight is not the mark of a skilled photographer. Even so, it would make for a much stronger avatar than your current choice. Worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/29811740 This image will get a lot of views, but it is not an attractive shot of you because of the soft focus, poor lighting, and poor composition. I would suggest culling this photo from your portfolio. Overall you have an exotic look and good form. Your current avatar does not do anything for you. Keep striving to work with more skilled photographers and you could build a striking portfolio. The bottom row takes from the strength of your portfolio and could be dropped. Much success, Michael
Photographer
wendy haigh
Posts: 517
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Would love to know your opinion
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
J Escritor wrote: I would welcome your critique. The photos on my port are of characters for our feature films at www.filmantics.com. Thanks, j. escritor Passing on this one
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Lumatic wrote: Your sense is correct, Michael. Thank you very much for your assessment! You are most welcome. Thank you for your honesty. Much continued success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
SaNo Photography wrote: I'm interested, thanks! Your work is all of the same level. You need to study more about lighting, composition and posing. For the most part, your crops are just too tight. You are working with some very attractive models. Work with your models more on capturing expression and feelings. The model needs to have emotional impact through her facial expression and body posing. She needs to interact with the viewer, not just stare at them blankly. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Victoria_Rose wrote: I'd like to know what you think of mine. It's obvious to me that you could be a very good model. You have a very interesting look. But you are being very poorly handled by unskilled photographers. They don't know what to do with you, so your images are all over the place. When there is a figure shot, it should be artfully done, not just cheesy. If you stay with this portfolio, you will stay with low end photographers. Seek out more skilled photographers, not just a photographer with a camera, who says nice things to you. Like I said, you have an interesting face and the form to succeed. I wish you much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Keri Lynn Timlin wrote: I'm interested in knowing my best/worst, critique, etc. You have a great look and the form to match, but you don't have a portfolio that will bring you work. You need to seek out better photographers who can help you show off your modeling potential. The composition, lighting and poses in your current port just don't work. When you have a decent pose, you lack a good expression. When you have a decent expression, the photographer failed to do his job with the lighting and composition. You've got the look and the form, but you are missing the high quality photos that will bring you work as a model. Study the poses and expressions of models that you admire. In my portfolio, look at how the body flows through the entire composition. You need images with impact and you will do well. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
ErinPaige wrote: I'd love to know what you think! I'm always looking for opinions and constructive critcism, and I'd LOVE a pro's input. Best: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32139939 This is the best photo in your port, but it is not shot by a high end photographer. https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/25696666 This could have been a great shot for your portfolio. You did a great job with the pose, but the photographer did a lousy job with lighting and composition. Worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32222120 This has zero redeeming value. It's a cheesy snapshot and doesn't belong in a model's portfolio. Overall I see an excellent model with lots of potential, working with novice and unskilled photographers. Keep seeking out photographers who can help you improve your professional portfolio. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Lisa Mae Russell wrote: Feedback, please! I will not pick out a best and worst, because they are all at about the same level. You've got a good face and some nice expressions. However, you are working with photographers who don't have the skills to feature your assets. I would suggest studying more about how you can best pose your body to flatter your form. Practice in the mirror. Also practice on developing your expressions. Once you have those down, seek out more skilled photographers who can bring out your positive features. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
eric cuomo wrote: just got my shoots done over the weekend with a new photographer. no editing or makeup. let me know whatcha think as i am trying to put my ZED together Your port looks like it is composed mainly of snapshots taken by friends. They do not have a professional quality to them. They lack good composition, posing and lighting. There should be more feeling to the images, not just that you are there. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
juliarabkin wrote: xo j Best: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/8388745 This has the strongest composition, expression, pose and lighting in your portfolio. Would make for a very strong avatar, better than your current choice. Worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32181195 This has poor composition and lighting. Takes strongly from your port. Weak: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30099124 This photo also pulls down your port and I would suggest culling it. It is not as strong as your other images. Overall in your black and white, you are using bold, classic lighting, which was popular in the U.S. during the 30's-40's and is still very popular in western Europe. It is nice to see you bringing it back. Your images would be stronger if the cropping wasn't so tight. You should study more on negative space. Your models are very good and convey a nice, feminine sensuality. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Ashley Alexiss wrote: meeeeeee Best: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31973109 This would make a great avatar and headshot if it were rotated 90 degrees counter clockwise. The hair and face look beautiful and show off your modeling potential. Very nice lighting and composition. Much stronger than your current avatar choice, which detracts from you as a model. Worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30116272 This image doesn't have good composition or lighting. It detracts from the rest of your portfolio and takes it in a different direction. Overall your portfolio competes with itself. I would suggest culling a lot of images, leaving your port leaner and stronger. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Carissa Campbell wrote: I would love to get your opinion. Passing on this one.
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Dani2121 wrote: I would appreciate your feedback! Thanks! -Dani Best: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31306169 This has the best composition, lighting and pose in your portfolio. Shows you better than your current avatar. Worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31306221 This image is just there. It lacks good composition, lighting and posing. Overall you are working with unskilled photographers who do not have sufficient knowledge and artistic ability. Also professionally, it is better not to do a full smile. It changes the facial structure in negative ways. You obviously have persistence to be out in the snow in such a skimpy fitness outfit. No skilled photographer would take a good model to conditions where she may be injured. Keep seeking to build your portfolio with photographers who have more skills. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Cecilia Or wrote: Please take a look. Your opinions will be deeply appreciated. Thank you very much. Have a nice day. Overall you have a good face and figure, which have a lot of potential. Unfortunately you are working with unskilled photographers, who don't know how to show off your assets. If you want to work professionally as a model, you need to seek out more skilled and artistic photographers. You certainly have a look that could succeed, but your current portfolio won't get you paid work. It will just attract the same skill level of photographers with whom you have already been working. I would also suggest rewriting your profile in the first person, so that you seem approachable. Either of these two photos would make for a better avatar than your current choice: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30773944 https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/25529500 Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Carlysle McNaught wrote: I'm down You look like you have a lot of potential as a male model. But you need more professional shots. The photos in your port are amateur snapshots. Clients judge the model by the quality of the photographs. It's unfortunate, but that's the way it is. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Mitch Merritt wrote: I would love to hear your thoughts. Thanks for taking the time Best: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30217084 Best lighting, composition and pose in your portfolio. Very beautiful model with a good expression. The color of the jacket frames her nicely. Would make for a much stronger avatar. Worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/29287475 https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/29287490 These two are the weakest in your portfolio due to weak composition, posing and lighting. The models are just standing there without interacting with the viewer. Overall your portfolio shows inconsistencies. Some images are very professionally done with excellent lighting, posing and composition, as if they were shot under the guidance of a very experienced photographer with a very experienced models. Others lack the same artistic refinements. Also your logo is very large and ornate, taking away from the visual impact of your photos. Much success, Michael
Photographer
Carissa Campbell
Posts: 15
Idaho Falls, Idaho, US
Model with Michael wrote: Passing on this one. Can I ask why?
Model
Calypso Moon
Posts: 848
Banning, California, US
I'm very interested in your opinion. I always struggle with deciding what to keep and what to toss to make my portfolio stronger.
Photographer
James Andrew Imagery
Posts: 6713
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
I'm always interested in feedback, and it's much appreciated if you'd care to look. thanks!
Model
Rachael R
Posts: 154
Denton, Texas, US
Juuuust in case you are still paying attention to this post.... me next. Thanks
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
Camerosity wrote: I'm game. Best: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/26760850 Best lighting, composition and pose in your portfolio. Very good model with a good expression and nice color range. Overall it's well done. I also like your avatar, but I prefer crops less tight. The hair could be given more prominence compared to the hand and arm. Worst: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/26801375 The lighting is fine, but the pose and composition detracts from the rest of your port. It's just there. https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/26199981 https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/26196260 On my calibrated monitor, these two images are about a stop under exposed and again the crop is way too tight. I would suggest studying more on negative space. Overall you have very good models, but you seem to expect them to pose instead of directing them for a strong composition. Only you as the photographer see what is being recorded and can direct the model to achieve the most visually pleasing result. I would also suggest giving your subject more breathing room by making your crops less tight. Wishing you much success, Michael
Photographer
Model with Michael
Posts: 391
Frederick, Maryland, US
AngelicaDemonica wrote: I am feeling a bit masochistic today, give me a shot? I'd like to see what you think is my best and worst? I think I already know which will be classified as the worst, but I would love to see what you think is my best? Passing on this one.
|