Anaheim, California, US
Mar 22 13 04:23 am Link
Washington Court House, Ohio, US
I like the second one better. looks more natural
Mar 22 13 04:29 am Link
Orlando, Florida, US
Brett Hunt wrote:
I second that.
Mar 22 13 04:30 am Link
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Love them both - favour the first because it works comprehensively. In the second you look stunning but the setting is a bit like an Ikea commercial - your pose and look and the set don't sync for me - in another setting this would be an outsanding shot.
Mar 22 13 04:47 am Link
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Number one is not very flattering to you at all. Your shape is deceptively pronounced in many ways and your skin stripped of texture, but most impressively your body has been flattened out despite every attempt to do the opposite through the use of dramatic lighting. Bad shot, way bad.
The second image is by far the better of the two. Your feminine qualities are displayed to a far greater effect.
Without a doubt I see it as one of your best overall.
Mar 22 13 04:53 am Link
Clearwater, Florida, US
Both are worthy additions to your collection.
Mar 22 13 10:53 am Link
Pawtucket, Rhode Island, US
Guss W wrote:
Mar 22 13 10:57 am Link
Richmond, Virginia, US
Both are good, 2nd one is awesome
Mar 22 13 10:59 am Link
Lemgo, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
great shots both of them, actually i like the first one more, but the burn out parts i don't like. maybe they just got lost during convertion to b&w.
Mar 22 13 11:06 am Link
Sun City, California, US
I like them both - but have minor quibbles with both. (but this is nitpicking)
The first has a few issues already mentioned -
The 2nd has your toes curled so tight - as to create a feeling of tension - that is directly in opposition to the quiet relaxed nature of the image.
I'd have no problem seeing them both included.
Mar 23 13 11:25 am Link
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
second one is lovely. first is okay.
Vojens, Syddanmark, Denmark
On both shots good work on your part. The first pic is overprocessed. The second is spot on.
Raleigh, North Carolina, US
i like the 2nd
Mar 23 13 11:31 am Link
Oslo, Oslo, Norway
David Kirk wrote:
Mar 23 13 11:54 am Link
Los Angeles, California, US
I personally don't like either. You are just an object within the frame in both. I think you can do more interesting work than this as the subject of the photos, instead of an object in the photos, but if you are happy with them, by all means, keep them.
Mar 24 13 06:01 am Link