Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
I'm amazed and I don't understand how's that even possible. I know that this type of videos don't fit exactly in this category, but I think I posted it in the right place since this kind of technology will help a lot in the retouching process.
Anyway, take a look:
Sep 10 13 03:11 am Link
Preston, England, United Kingdom
This is CRAZY! I was watching it thinking eh! how! erm!
It would be great for adding extra props to your photos etc.
Sep 10 13 03:21 am Link
Accrington, England, United Kingdom
That is completely mad. Seriously how is that even possible?!?!?
Sep 10 13 03:23 am Link
Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
Around the world Graphic Designers are quaking in their soon to be unemployed boots!
Sep 10 13 04:11 am Link
New York, New York, US
That's pretty cool! How do I get that program?
I'm imagining that you can use that on a model and pose her anyway you like!
Sep 10 13 04:34 am Link
El Segundo, California, US
Marin Photography NYC wrote:
The profile of objects currently has to be 'regular'; they showed how a tube of toothpaste caused problems.
Sep 10 13 04:41 am Link
Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
This is very interesting, thanks for sharing this video.
Steps look very fast on some simple elements ( where we don't have on file very problematic extractions like fly away hair and problematic transparent fabric/clothes, problematic fur or any problematic transparent objects, where you have to work special color decontamination steps which is the most complex work in retouching) .
On very simple elements for extracting software works fine ( but we can not see on 100% of view extracted edges, do we have any halo edges on file) .
So I think it is very early to discuss about this future software , until we don't have chance to check software with real files and situations.
You can do all these steps in some other 2d/3d software but you need more time to do job, but with that programs you have full control of edges and shadows , because you control all steps and situation.
I am always reserved with quick steps of extraction because quick steps make too much halo edges on file.
For example we already have on the market some plug-ins for hair extraction and transparent fabric/clothes extraction for composite work but not even one plug-in give professional results , so no one from the industry use that plug-ins for top professional results, because they produce halo edges in many cases.
Real professional extraction for composite work need highly skilled retoucher and it is very time consuming if you want to produce top realistic results ( without fake digital work with halo edges and non-realistic composite work with fake digital fantasy backgrounds)
On their tutorials you can see "miracles" but in reality it is different story .
In composite work and extraction each file is very unique to work and you have to be highly skilled and very experienced to know which steps you have to use for extraction and composite work in PS.
I can compare Professional extraction with D&B skin retouching.
If you want top beauty retouching there is one and only step--- pixel level D&B, no plug-ins.
It is the same with extraction - pixel level work on edges to avoid any problematic halo edges on file and later special color decontamination process for edges , hair , fur and transparent fabric.
Anyway we will see in the future these things , if this software can make miracles with fly away hair, transparent fabrics/objects ,and everything to be so perfect on 100% of view and with very large prints they will make revolution in photography business.
But again until we don't see everything perfect which I wrote above with real files and real situations and on 100% of view , we can not discuss anything.
I am very interesting to see their results with problematic elements for composite work which I described above .
Sep 10 13 05:05 am Link
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Copying my post from the General Industry thread on this same subject:
I am sure someone will find some limited practical applications for this, but the problems are rather glaring. For example, since the original lighting from the photo is mapped directly to the object, as soon as you rotate it, the lighting becomes wrong.
Also, the objects it is capable of doing are just extremely simple extrusions which could be modeled nearly as quickly by anyone competent in using a decent 3-D software app.
Notice the examples of fails at the end of the video. Just having a misplaced shadow in the image screws up the whole operation.
The technique is cute, but not really new (photogrammetry has been around for a while). This version seems rather like some grad student's Ph.D thesis project and not ready yet for prime time.
Sep 10 13 05:32 am Link
Lynchburg, Virginia, US
Grin Without a Cat wrote:
Sep 10 13 06:55 am Link
Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Sep 10 13 07:14 am Link
Fullerton, California, US
ST Retouch wrote:
What does appear advantageous, though, is the ability to easily duplicate existing elements and move them/manipulate them in a virtual 3D space.
Sep 11 13 12:11 am Link