Forums > Photography Talk > How to get this look?

Photographer

poiter

Posts: 577

Salt Lake City, Utah, US

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2720183/MM/Screen%20Shot%202015-11-05%20at%204.18.29%20PM.png

I was wondering if you guys could give some guesses on how this shot was done? I spent an hour on having a go at creating something similar, but did not get very close. Below are some of my attempts. I started off with just water drops on glass, then later on moved on to baby oil because it lasted longer. I tried moving the glass at different distances between the model and the camera. When you see the model hold the flash light, was just to help my camera focus, the room I was in was dark. The photos below are in no particular order.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2720183/MM/Screen-Shot-2015-11-05-at-4.20.jpg

On 2nd thought, I had just initially guess that the reference image was water drops on glass, but I now think maybe it was just water drops in mid air. What do you guys think?

Nov 05 15 03:32 pm Link

Photographer

Mark Reeder

Posts: 627

Huntsville, Ontario, Canada

Looks like opposite side lighting, one soft and one hard light. Your attempts looks like you used a big soft light from above. The bubble/waterdrops/dust look like that because they're back lit by the hard light.

Nov 05 15 04:08 pm Link

Photographer

Toto Photo

Posts: 3757

Belmont, California, US

Mark Reeder wrote:
Looks like opposite side lighting, one soft and one hard light. Your attempts looks like you used a big soft light from above. The bubble/waterdrops/dust look like that because they're back lit by the hard light.

+1

In addition to the drops being back lit, I believe they are already dried on the glass, not wet.

Nov 05 15 04:25 pm Link

Photographer

DOUGLASFOTOS

Posts: 10604

Los Angeles, California, US

OP....Why not ask the Photographer...Allan? He is on MM.

Nov 05 15 04:30 pm Link

Photographer

Barry Kidd Photography

Posts: 3351

Red Lion, Pennsylvania, US

There are several ways to do it but I prefer to use striplights myself.  For the example you showed "perhaps" a grid was used to restrict the light to a more narrow beam. 

The drops and easily be applied after the fact with an overlay if shooting them naturally becomes an issue.

https://www.barrykidd.com/photos/lighting-setup-02.jpg

I used something similar in the image below but rather than having one light in front of the subject and the other behind in this image both lights were 45 degrees behind the subject. One on each side and both had a grid attached to create more contrast.

https://www.barrykidd.com/photos/erica_1.jpg

Nov 06 15 04:06 am Link

Photographer

ddtphoto

Posts: 2590

Chicago, Illinois, US

My suspicion is that it's in post because there seems to be depth to the droplets, and motion, so not on a plane of glass. Maybe they shot a few plates on the black background with the models lighting and then "plated" them in. The droplets in front of the body would be a little more challenging in post. But to do this with an actual model you'd have to constantly have someone misting.

I know a photographer who does a similar effect on athletic images. It's pretty sweet and looks more like snow. I'm not sure exactly how he does it but I know for a fact that it isn't live.

Once you are misting the droplets you'd need, as others have said, a harder light source from behind. The light you are trying to use is too soft. You need something like a large reflector with maybe some frost diffusion, definitely not any sort of softbox or heavily diffused light.

Nov 06 15 01:28 pm Link

Photographer

Peter House

Posts: 888

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Cross lit

Nov 06 15 04:06 pm Link

Photographer

poiter

Posts: 577

Salt Lake City, Utah, US

Thanks everyone for your input, I very much appreciate it!

Nov 06 15 06:13 pm Link

Photographer

goofus

Posts: 808

Santa Barbara, California, US

a lot of lifting

Nov 09 15 11:19 am Link

Model

Shei P

Posts: 540

Brooklyn, New York, US

shot this playing around with my new A6000 and kit lens...maybe if the glass was farther away the drops would be smaller? 


https://photos-4.dropbox.com/t/2/AAA--dHYurTzwA5fLmuKpOM1Uwvygfq7ocRUJIY0WIgyzQ/12/7875751/jpeg/32x32/1/_/1/2/DSC01952.jpg/EMC37QUY8hMgBygH/IfFaTtf6ORiAP_vmicCzbd4VBy3S5_K559DXCLrzHRU%2Cg8oIRrav-EJbbV1ISWjbSrT5yyA3w6T53ZPRR9eYCKg?size=1280x960&size_mode=2

Nov 09 15 03:17 pm Link