Forums >
Model Colloquy >
What's the funniest most dumbest thing ever asked
So last night I was discussing my rates expected for types of shoot. An the photographer was like "you only want to get paid for erotic acts" but I was answering his questions about the difference between two types. So he said no thanks..... I awake to a message saying "just had a thought, for that rate, can I touch you? Or would i be allowed to".... Whatttt!? *face palm* I've been called stunning, sexy, etc I find it a confident boost. But this just what?!?. So now you? Nov 26 15 04:54 am Link I have some of my photos hung on my walls and I almost always have a slideshow screensaver on my AppleTV playing music. About half of the people who come through ask me if I took them. I suppose it's possible I would hang other people's work in my house and have images I just happen to like as the slideshow, but it's a stretch. I write it off as people just making conversation. To the OP: Depending on how much you're asking for the erotic work, why is it out of the realm of possibility that it's for POV erotic work with the other participant being the photographer? Nov 26 15 09:08 am Link Good Egg Productions wrote: Wow. So model quotes high rates = the photographer automatically can assume that it includes touching and/or porn and/or sex acts? Disgusting. Nov 26 15 09:17 am Link I had someone ask something like that back in 2010. I CAMed them. Nov 26 15 02:20 pm Link Koryn wrote: ? What does that mean ? Nov 26 15 04:12 pm Link Branditoxicrose wrote: Contact A Moderator. Nov 26 15 04:46 pm Link MoRina wrote: i dont think he automatically assumed based on a price. Nov 26 15 04:57 pm Link Branditoxicrose wrote: Paolo Diavolo wrote: Yeah, if someone attempts to solicit sexual favors, you go to the "contact a moderator" feature. Nov 26 15 06:39 pm Link I've had several people contact me asking what sort of adult work I do. Ummm....none. And then I report them. Why they think I do adult work, when I have no adult work in my portfolio or on any of my sites is really beyond me. Why they think this is the correct place to solicit that type of work is also beyond me. But, at the end of the day, I don't really care what their reasoning would be, I just report them. Same for people who would ask to touch me. It's gross, and unwarranted, and you can't reason with them (well, unless your willing to reason over that sort of work), so just flag them in the message section. Nov 26 15 07:17 pm Link Koryn wrote: I agree. Nov 26 15 08:26 pm Link Nov 26 15 08:47 pm Link He is obviously a creeper, cam his msg. Their is never a reason for what he was doing its just dicusting, simple as that... Nov 26 15 11:29 pm Link It wasn't a photography question, but it's worth repeating. I used to be a TV critic. I remember a press session once in L.A. with the cast of "Charlie's Angels". Some guy asked Jaclyn Smith, "Do you think your beauty has been a hindrance to your career?" Nov 27 15 12:24 am Link I always think it's funny (or reason to question my own communication skills) when a model I've hired for a nude project texts me the morning of asking "what should I wear?" Nov 27 15 11:22 am Link aquarelle wrote: this made me laugh! Nov 27 15 11:34 am Link MoRina wrote: If we are going to report photographers for asking models to define what "erotic acts" are, then we should be reporting models who do "erotic acts". Nov 27 15 04:53 pm Link I've have a few people ask me, who took my SELF PORTRAITS . Duh!!!!! Nov 27 15 05:06 pm Link Good Egg Productions wrote: You apparently didn't understand that I was put off by your answer. I quoted the offensive part for you and everything. Nov 27 15 05:53 pm Link Someone very recently asked me to retouch a photo they liked of themselves. They requested a few minor cosmetic changes to their appearance, and also to "improve the resolution and remove the background to make it look like a studio pic". They then proceeded to send me the grainiest, lowest-quality cell phone photo I have ever seen in this decade. I had to carefully explain to her why what she wanted was not possible. Nov 27 15 06:09 pm Link CamelliaFlower wrote: unrealistic expectation! theyve been watching too much TV haha. Nov 27 15 06:21 pm Link Paolo Diavolo wrote: Took a lot of restraint to respond "Honey...this isn't CSI: New York"! Nov 27 15 06:40 pm Link MoRina wrote: Then I probably misspoke originally. The amount a model charges shouldn't be the reason to assume that touching would be allowed or involved. A model's rates are her business and for her to justify. My point is that if you want to know the answer to a question, you have to ask the question. Nov 27 15 08:32 pm Link CamelliaFlower wrote: thats exactly what i was thinking! Nov 27 15 08:35 pm Link After a review of the OPs profile.....I wonder what the OP means when she says she shoots ADULT NUDES. How is that different than erotic nudes? I almost only shoot nudes and have never run into that genre before. Perhaps she can explain ... Thanks Nov 28 15 01:43 am Link Risen Phoenix Photo wrote: open leg. erotic nudes to me is closed leg Nov 28 15 07:49 am Link Branditoxicrose wrote: that makes no sense but I don't even shoot nudes. Nov 28 15 08:12 am Link Paolo Diavolo wrote: +1 Nov 28 15 08:17 am Link I once had a woman who responded to my Craigslist ad for a "fine art nude model" ask me, "I can wear my bra and panties, right"? Nov 28 15 08:39 am Link aquarelle wrote: Scheduled a model for a shoot, which would include her first nudes. She asked if she should bring any clothes. It's weird to me, because my nude shoots almost always include at least some clothing part of the time. Nov 28 15 08:58 am Link Art of the nude wrote: My avatar model was surprised that I asked her to bring the dress she is wearing. She is primarily a nude model. Nov 28 15 09:02 am Link Branditoxicrose wrote: Ok thanks for the definition, though that is different than most photographers define it. Most would say erotic is open leg, while adult would be considered something that would be against site rules. Nov 28 15 12:12 pm Link Risen Phoenix Photo wrote: +1 Nov 28 15 12:54 pm Link What an asshole! I'm appalled OP. I've been asked during a shoot "can I jerk off onto you?" and "'Can I just please have sex with you?" And other phrases like that... All of us have to be careful in this industry. I bring an escort, talk to the person ahead of time, or at least text someone where I am now. Nov 30 15 03:14 pm Link MainePaintah wrote: Just Photoshop that stuff out, eh? Dec 01 15 01:07 pm Link One 17yo girl asked with great trepidation if I was going to Photoshop her head onto a nude body. I asked why I'd go to all that trouble when a) she's not famous and b) I could just hire a beautiful nude. Dec 01 15 01:11 pm Link Twice I've had models respond to solicitations for lingerie shoots with, "I'm okay with doing lingerie as long as it's not too sexy." I didn't even bother to ask where the cutoff was. NEXT. I think its a legitimate question, but was just stated poorly. There is a large variance in coverage in what constitutes lingerie. To that end, I am very specific on the types of lingerie that I will wear and wont wear. Because I dont shoot nudes, I dont wear nipple bras and crotchless panties, so I can see where the model was going with the comment. When asked to do those types of shoots, I really hate to come across like a lawyer, but Id rather get everything out in the open (figuratively) than have someone pissed off that I cant/wont meet their expectations. Does that seem unreasonable? Dec 01 15 01:20 pm Link CharlieMW wrote: IMO, showing nipples and vulva is nudity. Serious question: Does Victoria's Secret sell nipple bras and crotchless panties? In at least one of those solicitations, I specified Victoria's Secret style. Dec 01 15 01:34 pm Link Branditoxicrose wrote: Dec 01 15 01:35 pm Link Paolo Diavolo wrote: Sometimes I say, "You can wear anything you want TO and FROM the studio." Dec 01 15 01:56 pm Link Orca Bay Images wrote: Victoria's Secret doesn't get any racier than a thong. But if you ask some of the photographers here, they will insist a shelf bra qualifies. That IMO goes a long way towards creating problems if not clarified beforehand. Dec 01 15 02:02 pm Link |