Some like lots of hair sme like none at all varying on your preference or what you want need for your vision. I've heard of ppl asking for some girls to grow it out
If you're an art nude model and you have "the look " they want it might come down to how it is down there.
I am unable to imagine anything I could care about less in terms of wanting or not wanting to work with a model. Perhaps for some concepts (historical, as in the Renaissance shoot mentioned earlier but then again google "merkin" for an historical context) call for a specific look as might a particular fetish but this strikes me as a sidebar to the endlessly pointless rant-filled threads about tattoos and other body modifications.
I got offered a lot of money to do a light erotic shoot, and I was sort of considering it, but then the photographer said that I would need to be completely shaved for it. I refuse to shave down there, so I declined. I'm a woman--I have pubic hair. I also just think it looks better, too.
I have worked with one fine art photographer who prefers women who have a bush. Right now I'm sporting a 70's porn bush that needs a trim. I won't do a landing strip but I have shaved for shoots. I'm fickle about my pubic hair. If you as a photographer prefer a certain look, ask for it. Models might say no but really it's up to you what you shoot. You just need to decide if it's a deal breaker.
I got approched by a model the other day wanting to do a "70's art nude style". She has no hair now so she is in the process of growing it out now. My preference is a landing strip or a well maintained bush. I hate the "bald" look.
PRImaging wrote: In a recent shoot with a model, she brought to my attention that many photographers reject her as a model because she refuses to grow pubic hair.
Is there really such a demand for models with pubes? I personally prefer to shoot models in nude shoots without or with a tidy landing strip as opposed to a big bush.
Is it really in such demand for models with pubes?
If you are a neatly shaved woman, and a photographer wanted to shoot you with pubes, would you grow it out, or just not fit into that particular mold?
I had a photog turn me down for an assignment because the small bush that I do have is groomed. Her specifically stated that he wanted the natural un groomed look, so yes, there is such a demand.
As for me, I keep it groomed and trimmed but not completely removed.
i have pubes, i have shaved them for shoots, sometimes i have shaved them and the shoot did not happen, then i was annoyed and started to dream of a day when i could charge a "pubes fee"
i mean if im going to "de-forest the oregon trail" you'd damn well better show up to take photos
For me, its a matter of shaving is painful, I have extremely sensitive skin and when i shave within hours its painful and itchy.
But since I charge to shoot, I leave it to the photographer, if he wants shaved, and hes paying, i shave.
i do get plenty of offers, even with all my "hair" and its not all that hairy
which is to say, i keep neat and "tidy" and its' not a "true bush" i don't think it looks like a playboy from the 70's
its nice and neat and well groomed and not "overgrown"
just like actors shave, put on weight, starve, whatever for "roles" i keep and shave my hairs when i am paid to do so