Forums >
Model Colloquy >
posing nude for art classes
My university's art department offers about $10-15/hr with a 2-hr minimum. Nov 03 10 01:40 am Link Shandra Stark wrote: Soaking in Masada's Joint and Muscle Nov 03 10 06:10 am Link I've been modeling for figure arts for 5 years, and $15 per hour is about average, for a 3 or 4 hour session. You often get booked for multiple sessions at a time, so while you might make only $60 for individual session, after 2 or 3 sessions, you've made well over $100. Figure drawing modeling requires almost no financial investment from the model, and very little preparation to get ready. They rarely care about things like make-up, or hair, definitely not about wardrobe. You just show up, take off your clothing and sit still for a long time. IMO, it's incredibly easy compared to photography figure modeling. Things like facial expression and specific hand placement are not major concerns. You do not have to have a specific "look" to work as a figure drawing/painting model, though many photographers will only shoot nude models who meet specific criteria. It's just very, very, very different types of modeling - even though the overall concept of the work might be the same as with photography. Nov 03 10 06:36 am Link I work for a artist's group here locally, and the pay is $25/hr for 3 hrs. The reason the pay is low, compared to regular nude photography rates is that's it's not photography....the artists use your figure as a basis for their own art. In other words, the resulting art is not an exact depiction of the model. Photography rates are higher because of usage. The other reason rates are low is because they require no experience, talent or particular look. Anyone can be an art model. Artists practice on differing body shapes and ages to gain skill. No preparation is required......nobody cares if you have had a pedicure, wear makeup, or have even taken a shower that day!!! I can wake up, shower and walk out the door. That means the time invested is 3 hours, not 3 hours + 2 hours prep time. The only reason I model for the group I work for is because they are a wonderfully warm, appreciative group of people. And, I like the physical challenge of holding poses. It is completely different than what I normally do, so I keep doing it! Nov 03 10 06:51 am Link I having been posing regularly (two days per week) for life drawing classes for the last two and a half years. The average pay in my area is $12 per hour, classes are three hours long. Last semester I was invited to pose for a painting class in addition to life drawing and the pay/time was the same for life drawing. There are a number of reasons that I pose nude for students. -I love the work -I enjoy the challenge of gesture poses and extended poses -I like being part of creating art and being part of someone's art education -I enjoy listening to the lectures given in class, it expands my knowledge of art -I like seeing the student's vision and improvments throughout the class That to me is more than worth the pay. I also like that I do not have to worry about the 'extras' that are needed when doing a photoshoot. i.e. nails, hair, makeup, wardrobe (if needed), finding locations (if requested to do so), assisting to plan the shoot etc... Though, I do enjoy photo shoots! My rates for photo shoots are different based on shoot content but also because I sign a release, I have more preperation for a shoot, photos can be sold, published, displayed in online portfolios, travel expenses. Also, I tend to get booked for outdoor photos shoots in the late fall and winter, nude and freezing temps are very challenging. Also, most drawings/paintings done by students are not as readily seen (aside from student art shows), I am not as easily identifiable and most if any of the works are not sold. Nov 03 10 07:05 am Link I agree, but, there are those who do not. Here is a similar thread which may answer some of your questions. https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thread_id=641490 Nov 03 10 08:03 am Link In the Portland area: Usually runs $13-$20 and hour, sometimes + tips in group settings. The model just has to be mostly clean, well rested, on time and ready to pose. Photos skew the rate because you are paying for usage more so than labor. So, if you are told that you are making $30+ assume cameras are allowed. Fit male models are in demand right now. Nov 03 10 09:53 am Link Masqued Mandie wrote: Wow. Nov 03 10 11:41 am Link In my experience the last 5 years in northern IN and Southern MI is the schools pay between $15 - $30 per hour and the times range from a one hour class to 3 hour classes. It is easy money and I have made a lot of contacts by doing the classes that have gotten me other paying jobs. University classes are my favorite because in my experience they have been run more professionally. Nov 03 10 11:54 am Link RodsHotShots wrote: They do it because they're their own boss. But more importantly because people are willing to pay the money. Nov 03 10 12:02 pm Link Extreme Body Art wrote: Like any pricing. I'm sure it will vary depending on the market. Plus, no matter how little someone will work for.. you'll find someone to work for less.. Nov 03 10 12:04 pm Link Masqued Mandie wrote: Yikes. That's way below minimum wage in my province. :S Nov 03 10 08:03 pm Link I was paid 17$/hr at a Florida community college. $14.75 at Illinois state Uni. hey...it covered my beer cost Nov 03 10 08:10 pm Link I would say more than half of the people who pose for me... do it for free or gas money. The half accept 10-15 per hour. Groups, I will pay up to 25. I always book three hour sittings! with a painting taking typically three to five sittings. Nov 03 10 08:26 pm Link That sounds about right. Gabby Nov 03 10 10:02 pm Link I think the most that I have been offered for art classes was $35/hr. But with colleges, it is a steady gig and can be a full day of work. Nov 03 10 10:09 pm Link The art classes at my school just pay a flat rate of $15hr. Its been $15hr for the past 4years. The models will pose for the art classes but not in front of a camera. Funny thing is the artist drawing the models are also the photography students offering more money($35-75hr) to models for nude digital work. I do not understand it. Nov 03 10 10:12 pm Link Awe-InspiringPhotograpy wrote: I totally understand it. Nov 04 10 02:33 am Link I'm curious as to how you get these jobs at the universities. Anyone care to explain? Nov 04 10 10:34 pm Link I used to pose for classes, but straining my back (I have a very bad back) to stay in one pose for an hour was just NOT worth $12. For goodness sakes, I'd go buy some painkillers and a bottle of water after the shoot and spend half what I made CREATING that pain, haha. It's just not my cup of tea! The poses are very different from those for a photographic medium in that they have to be held for long periods of time. I do love posing for private paintings/drawings however because it's only ONE pose, and usually the pose is somewhat comfortable. Also funny... I went to a highschool for fine arts. Was weird when an old, fellow nerd classmate showed up to the class and said, "Hey! So you're still drawing, huh? I hear we have a new model tonight..." I just looked away, sheepishly smiled and said, "Something like that." I was cruel. Kept eye contact with him for several of the preliminary poses. Poor guy's drawings all came out kinda scribbly... Couldn't help it. I have other stories. No feeling in my legs, and trying to stand up... kissed the carpet. Ohhhhh good times. Nov 04 10 11:28 pm Link Alisyn Carliene wrote: That's fantastic. What college? I'd like to give the heads up to some models. They're only getting $18.00 - $22.00 per hour or so here in Pasadena. Nov 05 10 03:31 am Link I'd imagine an art class will be less fussy about "quality" of the model (ie, the photographic quality) because there's more interpretation there and generally, in a class scenario, it's about learning a craft, rather than producing an image for commercial consumption on whatever level. The release issue comes into play too and the fact that potential usage can bring its own reward. Even at the GWC end, there's a more defined requirement or "taste" and a different motivation. Similarly, I charge less to photograph a family, or child than i do to photograph for a fashion client, or similar.. less planning, less commercial exploitation by the end user, less ball-ache all round really. In saying that, you're more likely to find a model willing to "trade up" and shoot nudes for free with a photographer than an art class.. more to gain. Nov 05 10 04:01 am Link I have never heard of an art class modeling getting anything close to a photographic model. Does seem to be weird to have such a difference in the two pay scales. The art class models have to hold a pose for a long time while the photo models are usually checking poses every minute or less. When I was in junior college the art class models were students getting paid on a work-study as part of their financial aid package. You can be sitting next to them in english class and then paint nudes of them in your art class. Nov 05 10 04:10 am Link $10.00 - $20.00 per hour in this area mostly in the low teens, more for photography. There's a whole set of assumptions regarding class, culture and commodity value of a woman's body that go into producing the difference. Mechanical reproduction lowers the price per object and depending on other aesthetic, cultural and economic factors increases the perceived availability of the woman represented. Nov 05 10 04:48 am Link Lindsey Joy wrote: First, some areas actually have a figure model's group. In the DC area there is one (I believe it's the Washington Figure Model's Guild"). The gallery closest to me that also offers figure classes uses a model from the WFMG. Nov 05 10 07:52 am Link Vector One Photography wrote: Actually, if you figure in costs, transportation, and setting up a shoot, pay is almost comparable for some models. Nov 05 10 08:06 am Link Lindsey Joy wrote: in addition to universities you very likely have at least one if not more art colleges or schools in a town of your size and quick check on Google would likely bring these up been basically call their main office Nov 05 10 08:13 am Link |