This thread was locked on 2011-07-05 09:45:37
Photographer
Elijah Pendragon
Posts: 4091
New Haven, Connecticut, US
-Jen- wrote: He will hear lotsa shit about my kitties! I put cute in SF2 with pics of baby kitties. Who is gonna bitch about cute baby kitties? Me. I hate cats. Top O The Page
Model
-Jen-
Posts: 46880
Howell, Michigan, US
brandon dean wrote: aw come on - the "biggest problem?" maybe the biggest problem for you, but let's not get too melodramatic. can't we have a healthy discussion about boobs without feelings getting hurt? hahaha oh, my feelings arent hurt at all. Like I said, my boobs. I'm the one who has to like them. And I do.
Photographer
Lawrence Guy
Posts: 17716
San Diego Country Estates, California, US
Elijah Pendragon wrote: Me. I hate cats. Even if you hate cats, you gotta respect Jen's devotion to animal rescue. Well, maybe you don't gotta, but people will look at you funny if you don't.
Photographer
Lawrence Guy
Posts: 17716
San Diego Country Estates, California, US
Just to cement the boob/kitten connection that just appeared:
Photographer
Elijah Pendragon
Posts: 4091
New Haven, Connecticut, US
Lawrence Guy wrote: Even if you hate cats, you gotta respect Jen's devotion to animal rescue. Well, maybe you don't gotta, but people will look at you funny if you don't. Umm if I don't like cats why would I want them rescued? But if that is Jens thing I give all due respect. Its nothing personal.
Photographer
Elijah Pendragon
Posts: 4091
New Haven, Connecticut, US
Lawrence Guy wrote: Just to cement the boob/kitten connection that just appeared:
Man that is wrong. That thing was just stepping in a box of its own crap.
Photographer
Lawrence Guy
Posts: 17716
San Diego Country Estates, California, US
Elijah Pendragon wrote: Umm if I don't like cats why would I want them rescued? *sigh* Must I pull out the soapbox again? /kidding
Model
-Jen-
Posts: 46880
Howell, Michigan, US
Elijah Pendragon wrote: Umm if I don't like cats why would I want them rescued? But if that is Jens thing I give all due respect. Its nothing personal. Because its the humane thing to do.
Photographer
Elijah Pendragon
Posts: 4091
New Haven, Connecticut, US
Lawrence Guy wrote: *sigh* Must I pull out the soapbox again? /kidding Nah I am easy LG. You like legs?
Photographer
Elijah Pendragon
Posts: 4091
New Haven, Connecticut, US
-Jen- wrote: Because its the humane thing to do. I have heard that.
Photographer
Aspect By Allanah
Posts: 2110
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
ShivaKitty wrote: Lawrence Guy wrote: Clearly the subject is important to her, probably for deeply personal reasons. Why does she have to post about other things? Why do so may people have to jump down her throat for talking about a subject that's important to her? /Not White Knighting. White Knights are trying to get laid. I'm just bored. and assume the OP is trolling. +1 either that or trying to advertise her even more boob related twitter/webcam shows.
Photographer
Aspect By Allanah
Posts: 2110
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Leah-A wrote: She likes big boobs and she cannot lie .... *snigger*
Photographer
FKVPhotography
Posts: 30064
Ocala, Florida, US
The better question is, "do big boobs turn men stupid?"..... Speaking for myself....absolutely....I turn into brain mush looking at LARGE boobs....they hold power over me!!!
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Allanah-Kyle-Photo wrote: +1 either that or trying to advertise her even more boob related twitter/webcam shows. DING DING DING
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
FKVPhotoGraphics wrote: The better question is, "do big boobs turn men stupid?"..... Speaking for myself....absolutely....I turn into brain mush looking at LARGE boobs....they hold power over me!!! Absolutely. Years ago, I worked part time in a liquor store. Those men rarely looked at my face.
Photographer
FKVPhotography
Posts: 30064
Ocala, Florida, US
Allanah-Kyle-Photo wrote: +1 either that or trying to advertise her even more boob related twitter/webcam shows. She has webcam shows!!!! WTF am I doing typing on a MM thread??????.....
Photographer
Lawrence Guy
Posts: 17716
San Diego Country Estates, California, US
Allanah-Kyle-Photo wrote: either that or trying to advertise her even more boob related twitter/webcam shows. If she's trying to advertise it's not working, at least on me. This is the first I've heard about it. *shrug*
Photographer
Elijah Pendragon
Posts: 4091
New Haven, Connecticut, US
Lawrence Guy wrote: If she's trying to advertise it's not working, at least on me. This is the first I've heard about it. *shrug* Its like one of those corner Peep shows. Sticky floors and all.
Photographer
Lawrence Guy
Posts: 17716
San Diego Country Estates, California, US
Elijah Pendragon wrote: Its like one of those corner Peep shows. Sticky floors and all. Never had the experience.
Photographer
FKVPhotography
Posts: 30064
Ocala, Florida, US
T wrote: Absolutely. Years ago, I worked part time in a liquor store. Those men rarely looked at my face. Face?...what face!!!....oh crap...I forgot to take a pic of her face....I need to brush up on my focusing skills...
Photographer
Vintagevista
Posts: 11804
Sun City, California, US
Allanah-Kyle-Photo wrote: +1 either that or trying to advertise her even more boob related twitter/webcam shows. Yup - It's why, after the 3rd or 4th consecutive "My Big Boobs!!" thread - the BS Detectors started ringing and folks were laying in wait for the next one - - - And the next one - - -
Photographer
Fashion Photographer
Posts: 14388
London, England, United Kingdom
Simple. 1. Clever girls can rely on their intellect to be successful. Less clever (stupid) girls cannot, and as such will tend to rely on their sex appeal to a greater extent than clever girls. 2. Therefore, stupid girls take steps to increase their sex appeal to a greater extent than clever girls. Thus, stupid girls will have a propensity to wear thicker padded bras, display more cleavage, and get more, and larger breast enhancements, than clever girls. 3. Ergo, the mean visible breast size of stupid girls will be larger than the overall median visible breast size, and the mean visible breast size of clever girls will be smaller. 4. Therefore, any given girl has a higher probability of being clever if she has visibly smaller than average breasts, and vice versa. QED
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
David-Thomas wrote: Simple. 1. Clever girls can rely on their intellect to be successful. Less clever (stupid) girls cannot, and as such will tend to rely on their sex appeal to a greater extent than clever girls. 2. Therefore, stupid girls take steps to increase their sex appeal to a greater extent than clever girls. Thus, stupid girls will have a propensity to wear thicker padded bras, display more cleavage, and get more, and larger breast enhancements, than clever girls. 3. Ergo, the mean visible breast size of stupid girls will be larger than the overall median visible breast size, and the mean visible breast size of clever girls will be smaller. 4. Therefore, any given girl has a higher probability of being clever if she has visibly smaller than average breasts, and vice versa. QED
Photographer
Andialu
Posts: 14029
San Pedro, California, US
David-Thomas wrote: Simple. 1. Clever girls can rely on their intellect to be successful. Less clever (stupid) girls cannot, and as such will tend to rely on their sex appeal to a greater extent than clever girls. 2. Therefore, stupid girls take steps to increase their sex appeal to a greater extent than clever girls. Thus, stupid girls will have a propensity to wear thicker padded bras, display more cleavage, and get more, and larger breast enhancements, than clever girls. 3. Ergo, the mean breast size of stupid girls will be larger than the overall median breast size, and the mean breast size of clever girls will be smaller. 4. Therefore, any given girl has a higher probability of being clever if she has visibly smaller than average breasts, and vice versa. QED e = (0)(0)²
Photographer
Elijah Pendragon
Posts: 4091
New Haven, Connecticut, US
Lawrence Guy wrote: Never had the experience. Really? The floors I dont mind so much, its the door knobs.
Photographer
Fashion Photographer
Posts: 14388
London, England, United Kingdom
Jim Macias wrote: e = (0)(0)²
Photographer
Fashion Photographer
Posts: 14388
London, England, United Kingdom
T wrote:
I've come to learn that on modelmayhem, that's the emoticon people use when they don't like your conclusion, but can't fault your reasoning.
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
David-Thomas wrote: Simple. 1. Clever girls can rely on their intellect to be successful. Less clever (stupid) girls cannot, and as such will tend to rely on their sex appeal to a greater extent than clever girls. 2. Therefore, stupid girls take steps to increase their sex appeal to a greater extent than clever girls. Thus, stupid girls will have a propensity to wear thicker padded bras, display more cleavage, and get more, and larger breast enhancements, than clever girls. 3. Ergo, the mean visible breast size of stupid girls will be larger than the overall median visible breast size, and the mean visible breast size of clever girls will be smaller. 4. Therefore, any given girl has a higher probability of being clever if she has visibly smaller than average breasts, and vice versa.
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
David-Thomas wrote: I've come to learn that on modelmayhem, that's the emoticon people use when they don't like your conclusion, but can't fault your reasoning. I've learned that you can't reason with everybody on MM so don't bother.
Photographer
Fashion Photographer
Posts: 14388
London, England, United Kingdom
T wrote: I've learned that you can't reason with everybody on MM so don't bother. And to think I even layed it out in baby steps for you. Such a waste.
|