Digital Blitz wrote:

For Trying to emote: 9
Hourglass proportionate figure: 8
Height: 8.5
Port : 3
Hair: 7.5
Writing a confusing self-plugging on "A little more about me": 1
Overall: 7

Thank you very much! I appreciate the feedback. I would like to make my bio better since I'm not trying to self-plug. Do you have any suggestions? Also, do you feel that my port and emotions will get better as I go and this is something to continue?

Mary Li 82 wrote:
me?

Port: 6 (need more pics)
Lips: 8
Hair: 9
Body: 8.5
Overall: 8

Robyan wrote:
I think i got skipped too

Expressions: 7
Port: 6
Looks:7
Figure:7
Overall: 6.5

Digital Blitz wrote:

That was intentional. I have strong reservations against underaged people in this website.

Really?
That's the first time I've heard anything like that.
MM is all about the models, one of the biggest websites FOR models...
In the real modeling world, most of the best models (or at least in Europe) are between the ages of 14-23. (This is not to downgrade older models in any way, 27 is still a great age to work) I'm constantly shocked at how you "photographers" on here don't educate yourselves about these kinds of things. I'm a high fashion model since age 15 and nobody has ever told me I'm "young".
There's no such thing as the term "under age" professionally speaking in this industry. If you only consider girls over 18, that's amateur... Go pick up a REAL magazine (even a swimsuit/lingerie) magazine, such as Vogue Italia, and maybe you'll learn something new.

Fotografica Gregor wrote:
Yes please - I like you rating schema and the thought you are putting into this instead of just making it a "game"

Your portraits are awesome. So are your play with lights.

My only complaint is: maybe, just maybe, you are going overboard with your post production photoshop...

In any event:
Portraits: 9
Lights and shadows:9
Quality of models: 9
Port: 9
Overall: 9

Evalia wrote:
consider me.

Height: 8.5
Hourglass figure: 8.5
Port: 2.5
Looks: 6
Overall: 6.5

Mark Lachance wrote:
Uploaded some different indoor shots, perhaps this will help my score.

These are pbviously better pictures. Good luck!

Digital Blitz wrote:

Your portraits are awesome. So are your play with lights.

My only complaint is: maybe, just maybe, you are going overboard with your post production photoshop...

In any event:
Portraits: 9
Lights and shadows:9
Quality of models: 9
Port: 9
Overall: 9

Thank you -   I am admittedly struggling with editing / post work -   I feel deeply that it is a critical aspect of the image creation process, and I do not want to delegate this to a professional retoucher.  I am working hard to improve my skills and know that I need to develop a consistent style - 

I appreciate the generous "marks"

Cheers

Erica America wrote:
Let's play.

You port says you dont do nudes....yet there are a few nude shots. And your body is well suited for figure studies.

Fugure: 8.5
Looks: 7
Port:6.5
Smile: 7
Expressions: 8
Overall: 7.5

Studio Gregor wrote:
Would appreciate your input -  be forewarned that this portfolio is 18+

Thank you in advance

Again youexcel in lights and shadows...you have perfected that. Lets hire a professional retoucher sometimes. They have to earn a living too. What say?

Magical Moments  wrote:
count me...

Camera angles: 6
Lights : 6
Port:5.5

MelodyRayne wrote:
I would love a number as well please =]

port: 2
Looks: 7
Figure:7.5
Overall: 5.5

Rebecca Loren Photo wrote:
I'd love to know!

Nice outdoors: 7

PeTe-Rock-a-Holik wrote:
Im down!!!

DAAAAAANG! you are good. Your Port has too few pics though!

Originality: 8.5
Port: 6
Lighting & shadows: 8.5
Over all 8

nigel kent wrote:
ok please

I thought I have already commented on you.

Bruce Amoroso wrote:
lets do this!

Quality of model: 8,5
Port: 8
Outdoors:8.5
Indorrs:7
Overall: 8

The R Photography wrote:
Need some critique...

Lets have few more pictures indoors...we shall talk.