Photographer
What Fun Productions
Posts: 20868
Phoenix, Arizona, US
Children having children is never a good idea.
Model
Laura UnBound
Posts: 28745
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
What Fun Productions wrote: Children having children is never a good idea. Many types of people having children isn't a good idea.
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Photographer
bgcfoto
Posts: 5446
Charlotte, North Carolina, US
Connor Photography wrote: Many of them have razor cut scars all over their arms and legs. Where are all these sexy ladies?
Model
Anne_C
Posts: 728
Bellingham, Washington, US
Laura UnBound wrote: Many types of people having children isn't a good idea. +1000
Model
Anne_C
Posts: 728
Bellingham, Washington, US
bgcfoto wrote: Where are all these sexy ladies? Here!
Photographer
Looknsee Photography
Posts: 26342
Portland, Oregon, US
Maybe these moms went to a school who had to teach abstinence as the only form of birth control? Maybe teens' hormones always override the brain? Maybe having sex & getting pregnant is a great way to demonstrate that the teen mom is no longer a child? Maybe all her friends are doing it? Maybe Bobby Quarterback is so dreamy? Maybe she believed that the extreme right politicians who want to outlaw abortion will take care of her & the kid? Maybe that's what her mother did? Maybe she didn't know that she could get pregnant from a toilet seat? Maybe she didn't pay attention in class, because all this health talk is so gross, and school is for losers? Geez, what are the odds? Who knows?
Model
hygvhgvkhy
Posts: 2092
Chicago, Illinois, US
Orca Bay Images wrote: Connor Photography wrote: Recently I have encountered lot of teen single mother, why did they bring the child into this world while they are not capable of raising them. Many of them have razor cut scars all over their arms and legs. Waitwaitwait... THE BABIES HAVE RAZOR CUT SCARS?!? CALL CPS! THESE BABIES IS BEIN' ABUSED! OMG!!! On a more serous note, Way to generalize, dude.
Birth control is readily available for everyone, why didn't they seek this option. How do you know they didn't? Most methods of contraception are not perfect. The only one that is, is not having sex.
Let's all start threads about moralizing and lecturizing and saving the world from single moms and the babies with razor cuts on their little arms and legs. well hell just froze over as i agree with orca bay, but seriously dude? you cant be serious. yes its Sometimes upsetting, and none of your business.
Model
hygvhgvkhy
Posts: 2092
Chicago, Illinois, US
What Fun Productions wrote: Children having children is never a good idea. true, and you can be an adult at 17 and a child at 30. but while it may not be a good idea again, its no one elses business.
Photographer
What Fun Productions
Posts: 20868
Phoenix, Arizona, US
Presley ONeil wrote: true, and you can be an adult at 17 and a child at 30. but while it may not be a good idea again, its no one elses business. BS. It's society's business.
Photographer
Aaron Lewis Photography
Posts: 5217
Catskill, New York, US
Carlos Occidental wrote: License to reproduce. You already need a license to do business or drive a car. But any asshole can make as many babies as they like, for the rest of us to support over time. Lovely. Intese screenings of psychological and financial well being should be done before the license is issued. People may obviously have as much sex as they like. They should'nt be allowed to reproduce indiscriminately. I've been saying this for years. I'd like to add a stipulation as well. If you have lets say one child and you seek government help like welfare or whatever. Any child born after you apply for benefits is NOT covered, ever.
Photographer
Patrick Walberg
Posts: 45196
San Juan Bautista, California, US
Connor Photography wrote: Recently I have encountered lot of teen single mother, why did they bring the child into this world while they are not capable of raising them. Many of them have razor cut scars all over their arms and legs. Birth control is readily available for everyone, why didn't they seek this option. I understand that many told me that how much they love their kid. The kid changed their love. Will they still love their kid when they become a teenager and no longer as cute as when they are 2 and 3 yrs old. Will they have sufficient means to put them thru school and college? The cycle continues. It is troublesome when so many children growing up in a dysfunctional family. We, as a whole, will pay for it one way or another. What should we do? I don't think I've ever read so many stereotypes, assumptions and inflammatory statements in one short original post before! Are you a troll? Maybe you are a butt hurt conservative who is mad because the last two Democrat Presidents were raised by single moms ... and they still turned out alright?
Model
Phane
Posts: 2063
Rockville, Maryland, US
Anne_C wrote: Um... Wow. I'm not even sure where to start on this one. I don't consider myself a person who is easily offended, but... I'm kinda offended. I was a young mother (I am now 28), unwed, with razor scars all over my arms -- troubled childhood, what can I say. I quit the habit many years ago, before my kids were born. Yes, my first child was an "accident" (missed taking a birth control pill). Best accident ever to happen to me. I am an awesome mom. I now have two beautiful, perfect, polite, kind, incredibly smart and well-adjusted little boys who tell me every day that I am the "best mama in the whole world." I love them more than anything. Yes, as a young unwed mother it was sometimes a struggle, both emotionally and financially - but since when is parenthood ever NOT a struggle? Your stereotypes suck. From one single mom to another thank you for this
Photographer
bgcfoto
Posts: 5446
Charlotte, North Carolina, US
Anne_C wrote: Here! Apparently.
Model
hygvhgvkhy
Posts: 2092
Chicago, Illinois, US
Aaron Lewis Photography wrote: I've been saying this for years. I'd like to add a stipulation as well. If you have lets say one child and you seek government help like welfare or whatever. Any child born after you apply for benefits is NOT covered, ever. ive been wishing for that stipulation for years-.-
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Aaron Lewis Photography wrote: I've been saying this for years. I'd like to add a stipulation as well. If you have lets say one child and you seek government help like welfare or whatever. Any child born after you apply for benefits is NOT covered, ever. Yeah, let that precious little bastard starve to death, that will teach their whoring mother a lesson. Some of you people are ridiculous.
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Presley ONeil wrote: ive been wishing for that stipulation for years-.- Maybe you should make it out of your teens first. For years? So at 12 you were concerned about teen mothers who collect welfare? *sigh*
Model
hygvhgvkhy
Posts: 2092
Chicago, Illinois, US
T wrote: Maybe you should make it out of your teens first. For years? So at 12 you were concerned about teen mothers who collect welfare? *sigh* yeah. Again an age judgement from someone who didnt know me when i was twelve(-: its okay, I don't mind.
Photographer
JLC Images
Posts: 11615
Phillipsburg, New Jersey, US
JessieLeigh wrote: I blame MTV. Glamorizing teenage pregnancy and paying teenage moms to make tv shows so MTV casn make more money. (Only partially joking) Actually teen pregnancy is down since the show started. Lots of sources say the show has a positive impact against teens getting pregnant.
Model
hygvhgvkhy
Posts: 2092
Chicago, Illinois, US
T wrote: Yeah, let that precious little bastard starve to death, that will teach their whoring mother a lesson. Some of you people are ridiculous. & no if you put a kid on welfare you should get some form of birth control(IMO, not the pill) and if you get pregnant anyway, then sorry thats on you. I know ive mentioned my moms neighbor before, the one whose whole familys being fed by the government, shes about to have her third any day now. Third, planned.
Photographer
rmcapturing
Posts: 4859
San Francisco, California, US
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Presley ONeil wrote: & no if you put a kid on welfare you should get some form of birth control(IMO, not the pill) and if you get pregnant anyway, then sorry thats on you. Yeah, let the little bastard starve!! Who cares, it's just a baby.
Photographer
What Fun Productions
Posts: 20868
Phoenix, Arizona, US
T wrote: Yeah, let the little bastard starve!! Who cares, it's just a baby. LaT, I think that's a bit harsh.
Photographer
JLC Images
Posts: 11615
Phillipsburg, New Jersey, US
T wrote: Yeah, let the little bastard starve!! Who cares, it's just a baby. I'm sure that isn't what she meant. I like the idea of someone her age being involved in the discussion. I usually find it more productive to help educate without making the other person feel stupid.
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
What Fun Productions wrote: LaT, I think that's a bit harsh. I'm only repeating what they are suggesting. That's what they are saying, whether I call the kid a baby or bastard...doesn't matter. These people are suggesting allowing children to starve to death to punish a teenage mother. That's HARSH!
Model
hygvhgvkhy
Posts: 2092
Chicago, Illinois, US
T wrote: Yeah, let the little bastard starve!! Who cares, it's just a baby. no, let the mom learn how to figure shit out on her own. thats called Taking responsibility, for Your actions. but i suppose values are lost. oh well.
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
JLC Images wrote: I'm sure that isn't what she meant. I like the idea of someone her age being involved in the discussion. I usually find it more productive to help educate without making the other person feel stupid. It's what she said...I have no control over how "stupid" she feels about abandoning innocent babies.
Photographer
Aaron Lewis Photography
Posts: 5217
Catskill, New York, US
T wrote: Yeah, let that precious little bastard starve to death, that will teach their whoring mother a lesson. Some of you people are ridiculous. You obviously don't see the reality. The children starve anyway while the tax payers money goes to by the mother fancy new designer clothes, tattoos, cigarettes, etc. They know they'll get a bigger paycheck with every child they have so they keep having children. Fuck that, go get a job.
Presley ONeil wrote: no, let the mom learn how to figure shit out on her own. thats called Taking responsibility, for Your actions. but i suppose values are lost. oh well. Exactly You have to prove you're a worthy parent and can provide for a child before adopting one so why not put the same restraints on people before they have a child of their own?
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Presley ONeil wrote: no, let the mom learn how to figure shit out on her own. thats called Taking responsibility, for Your actions. but i suppose values are lost. oh well. Yeah, mom will learn her lesson....mean while the baby starves. Suppose humanity is lost.
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Aaron Lewis Photography wrote: You obviously don't see the reality. The children starve anyway while the tax payers money goes to by the mother fancy new designer clothes, tattoos, cigarettes, etc. They know they'll get a bigger paycheck with every child they have so they keep having children. Fuck that, go get a job. You watch too much bullshit on FOX. I've worked with needy families for many years and you are uninformed of the majority of people who need assistance. Feed that shit to someone who's ignorant of this subject....I am not.
Photographer
Aaron Lewis Photography
Posts: 5217
Catskill, New York, US
T wrote: You watch too much bullshit on FOX. I've worked with needy families for many years and you are uninformed of the majority of people who need assistance. Feed that shit to someone who's ignorant of this subject....I am not. I just call it the way I see it. I'm talking about every day on the street and in the stores, not on TV. I'm not saying there aren't families in need but I'm saying if you are in fact receiving help you should NOT be allowed to have additional children while doing so.
Photographer
Patrick Walberg
Posts: 45196
San Juan Bautista, California, US
The problem is NOT always on the single moms. It takes a dick to get her pregnant, and many of these fathers leave, don't pay child support, go to prison, or even get killed. There are many reasons why the father might not be there! I don't want to be an ass and make assumptions as to why the fathers aren't there anymore than I would want to be an ass and pin the blame on the mom like the op did!
Model
hygvhgvkhy
Posts: 2092
Chicago, Illinois, US
T wrote: You watch too much bullshit on FOX. I've worked with needy families for many years and you are uninformed of the majority of people who need assistance. Feed that shit to someone who's ignorant of this subject....I am not. Majority* we were talking about a type of family. the specific type of family that i know very well& he just described, perfectly. If the checks stopped coming in, they could easily sell that playstation, xbox, tv, stereo.. or get a job!!!
Photographer
Aaron Lewis Photography
Posts: 5217
Catskill, New York, US
Patrick Walberg wrote: The problem is NOT always on the single moms. It takes a dick to get her pregnant, and many of these fathers leave, don't pay child support, go to prison, or even get killed. There are many reasons why the father might not be there! I don't want to be an ass and make assumptions as to why the fathers aren't there anymore than I would want to be an ass and pin the blame on the mom like the op did! Agreed. It takes two and the father should own up as well. I'm calling it as a family deal not just moms in general.
Model
Kaley King
Posts: 1027
Jefferson City, Missouri, US
twoharts wrote: if society can't deal with teen mothers, maybe all girls should be forced to have an IUD until they are 18. they can have all the sex they want, but they won't get pregnant (for the most part). but i think an easier solution is to offer easy access to free birth control. i don't think that's the case today. Forced birth control? Iuds aren't good unless a female has already had a baby or it can lead to scarring in the uterus.
Photographer
Patrick Walberg
Posts: 45196
San Juan Bautista, California, US
Presley ONeil wrote: Majority* we were talking about a type of family. the specific type of family that i know very well& he just described, perfectly. If the checks stopped coming in, they could easily sell that playstation, xbox, tv, stereo.. or get a job!!! Yes, he could! He could pay child support if he has a job. These babies don't just happen with the mom ... there is a man in the picture some where at sometime. But like I said, single moms are usually single because the man bailed on her and his child. Many don't have the money, or don't want to pay the child support. I'm not saying all fatherless children are in that situation. Sometimes the father was killed in war. Sometimes he ended up in jail. There are a lot of reasons why children are being raised by single momes.
Model
hygvhgvkhy
Posts: 2092
Chicago, Illinois, US
Patrick Walberg wrote: The problem is NOT always on the single moms. It takes a dick to get her pregnant, and many of these fathers leave, don't pay child support, go to prison, or even get killed. There are many reasons why the father might not be there! I don't want to be an ass and make assumptions as to why the fathers aren't there anymore than I would want to be an ass and pin the blame on the mom like the op did! it does take two, but in the case of the teenagers& blame, i very much blame the girls parents. Why? obvious reasons.. raise your kids right, there would be less problems. and while walking away is an obnoxious assholeish thing to do, its real easy to do when you're 17. and i like to think most deadbeats regret it most of their life. good.
Model
Little Queenie
Posts: 6219
Indio, California, US
Patrick Walberg wrote: The problem is NOT always on the single moms. It takes a dick to get her pregnant, and many of these fathers leave, don't pay child support, go to prison, or even get killed. There are many reasons why the father might not be there! I don't want to be an ass and make assumptions as to why the fathers aren't there anymore than I would want to be an ass and pin the blame on the mom like the op did! Exactly! We put so much pressure on teenage mothers to be responsible for their children, but what about dad?
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Presley ONeil wrote: does take two, but in the case of the teenagers& blame, i very much blame the girls parents. Why? obvious reasons.. raise your kids right, there would be less problems. and while walking away is an obnoxious assholeish thing to do, its real easy to do when you're 17. and i like to think most deadbeats regret it most of their life. good. Yeah a lot teenage girls think their smart and are actually dumb as hell.
Makeup Artist
T
Posts: 53557
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Presley ONeil wrote: Majority* we were talking about a type of family. the specific type of family that i know very well& he just described, perfectly. If the checks stopped coming in, they could easily sell that playstation, xbox, tv, stereo.. or get a job!!! Um, many people who receive assistance HAVE jobs. So you want to pick and choose which family is entitled to help and which babies should be thrown in the fire? Many people have worked and ran into financial difficulties; divorce, death in family, illness in family, recession. Many military families are very poor....do we say fuck you to their babies too? I mean, it's my tax dollars and all.
|