Hector Fernandez wrote:
Digital...I knew it hahahahahaa.
Yes you were, but probably for the wrong reason.As Kaouthia stated those artifacts on the nose are a result of jpeg compression and are not present on the full res in any shape or form. They could have just as easily been present in a scanned negative/photo after linking on here via flickr.
Leggy Mountbatten wrote:
Actually, that bokeh looks just like one of those old 55's. Those lenses had terrible bokeh, and this image does (look at the double-line bokeh in the upper left).
Of course it does, thats what it is. I was alluding to another false argument earlier that suggested the bokeh was to modern for it to be film.
Terrible bokeh? Nah not to me. Its a classic lens in build and rendering and only £10 too!