Can't be my shot because the model has very fair skin and I am not fond of heights lol
That shot couldn't be mine because the skin is too uneven and saturated, and there is not enough detail in the shadows of the model. You can see blue fringes around the hair that I wouldn't accept. I want everything that is the model to be interesting. For such a close-in crop, this is very important to me. Sometimes I want background interest too.
PS. My avatar is different now than it was a yesterday.
Bear wrote:
Couldn't be mine because I wouldn't like the hair in the face and I'd do something different with my hands and expression. And my ta tas aren't that big :p
Hey Bear, Don't be downplaying your ta tas. Some of us still remember "Crazy Bear".
That shot couldn't be mine because the skin is too uneven and saturated, and there is not enough detail in the shadows of the model. You can see blue fringes around the hair that I wouldn't accept. I want everything that is the model to be interesting. For such a close-in crop, this is very important to me. Sometimes I want background interest too.
PS. My avatar is different now than it was a yesterday.
Couldn't be mine becaues I would look terrible as a blonde
Couldn't be mine becaues I would look terrible as a blonde
Couldn't be mine because I wouldn't like the hair in the face and I'd do something different with my hands and expression. And my ta tas aren't that big :p
Meghan Devlin wrote: Couldn't be mine because I don't have those abs! Also, I don't think I could pull off the badassery.
Because I would have lit her differently (more low key) and used a stronger pose, and I probably would have put her in front of a darker background, to accentuate the emotion she's showing.
Because I would have lit her differently (more low key) and used a stronger pose, and I probably would have put her in front of a darker background, to accentuate the emotion she's showing.
Because I would have lit and posed it differently. I have had a certain fascination with Venetian ball masks since the first time I watched the movie, To Catch a Thief.
However, once you cover the model's face, I believe there should be another reason for making the photograph other than to show the mask. It might be expressive eyes and/or lips, a pose, the wardrobe (or the absence of it), the surroundings...
Samantha Liana wrote: I would prefer myself to be cropped differently, and a different background.
I can't think of a reason in the world - except that I live in St. Louis, and you're in Toronto.
Drew Smith Photography wrote:
Couldn't be mine as I dislike 'collages'. Two lovely shots that would work beautifully as single images.
Camerosity - I prefer a more creative/different avi. To stand out more.
Drew Smith - Man... I can't see any reason why that couldn't mine. Beautiful... but I guess... I'd try a different approach with the softy effect. Maybe give it more texture for less of an angelic look that it has now. Make it look more dominant.
I would love this avi - maybe it could be me - You are very crative at your work
I would need to step up to be on your level - really hope to get there
For one thing, the color's off (although I like the look of this pic overall). I would have cropped it tighter. Mainly, I'm in St. Louis, and Cynthia's in New Jersey.
Camerosity wrote: For one thing, the color's off (although I like the look of this pic overall). I would have cropped it tighter. Mainly, I'm in St. Louis, and Cynthia's in New Jersey.
I like the portrait and light, but I would look absolutely horrendous in that shade of lipstick (which works for your model). It'd kill the shot if I took it.
Samantha Emme wrote: I like the portrait and light, but I would look absolutely horrendous in that shade of lipstick (which works for your model). It'd kill the shot if I took it.
Oh, all right. You can wear your choice of lipstick, Samantha.
| 
| 
| edu