login info join!
Forums > Critique > 1 Good 1 Bad Comment on My Newest Port Additions Search   Reply
12last
Model
Pretty Kimmy
Posts: 80
Tempe, Arizona, US


Hey hey I have new photos and naturally I want your opinions!

Give your most HONEST comments on my new lingerie photos.

1 Good 1 Bad on two separate photos... or else you are a http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg.

GO!
Nov 29 12 11:58 am  Link  Quote 
Model
E e v a
Posts: 1,724
Nashville, Tennessee, US


http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30782007

Good: Lovely eyes and smile. Bad: Pick a better photographer. He made it look like a snapshot sad

http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30782015

Good: Very nice figure and good outfit choice. Bad: You need to work on posing to where you look more relaxed.
Nov 29 12 12:05 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 32,233
Lodi, California, US


http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b510bd675f3_m.jpg
Good: You have nice white teeth.
Bad: Disastrous photography (terrible lighting, out of focus, and zero postprocessing).

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b51031554b6_m.jpg
Good: You got one more shoot's worth of experience.
Bad: You have zero modeling skills. (That's not confined to this shot.)
Nov 29 12 12:30 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Victoria MHP
Posts: 886
Houston, Texas, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:
http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b510bd675f3_m.jpg
Good: You have nice white teeth.
Bad: Disastrous photography (terrible lighting, out of focus, and zero postprocessing).

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b51031554b6_m.jpg
Good: You got one more shoot's worth of experience.
Bad: You have zero modeling skills. (That's not confined to this shot.)

I have to agree hmm sorry.

Nov 29 12 12:40 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Shaun Tia
Posts: 1,696
Phoenix, Arizona, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:
http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b510bd675f3_m.jpg
Good: You have nice white teeth.
Bad: Disastrous photography (terrible lighting, out of focus, and zero postprocessing).

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b51031554b6_m.jpg
Good: You got one more shoot's worth of experience.
Bad: You have zero modeling skills. (That's not confined to this shot.)

+1,000,000,000

Nov 29 12 01:39 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Lee_Photography
Posts: 8,567
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:
http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b510bd675f3_m.jpg
Good: You have nice white teeth.
Bad: Disastrous photography (terrible lighting, out of focus, and zero postprocessing).

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b51031554b6_m.jpg
Good: You got one more shoot's worth of experience.
Bad: You have zero modeling skills. (That's not confined to this shot.)

Total agreement

You still have the bad images in your portfolio after the last thread when you also asked for a critique, unless you delete the bad plus add some quality images the old portfolio will not get any better

Nov 29 12 01:59 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Victoria MHP
Posts: 886
Houston, Texas, US


Lee_Photography wrote:

Total agreement

You still have the bad images in your portfolio after the last thread when you also asked for a critique, unless you delete the bad plus add some quality images the old portfolio will not get any better

So what I'm understanding is that she is in fact the troll??? (looking for compliments, instead of taking the advice she's been given)

Nov 29 12 02:03 pm  Link  Quote 
Retoucher
IdontKnowIForgot
Posts: 3,827
Louth, England, United Kingdom


http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b510dfb7923.jpg

Just focusing on your modeling and not the snapshots:

I like the corset and the styling as an idea.
You need to learn how to make your body look better in shots, how to elongate yourself, for instance; your right leg bent over your straightened left leg would have looked more elegant and probably would have extenuated your waist and hips.

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/10/50b50a419b590.jpg

Beautiful face for professionally done beauty/portrait and probably the best angle for your face in your portfolio so far, but little expression change and where there is a particular expression, it doesn't look so condfident, or looks a bit awkward.
Nov 29 12 03:03 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Cherrystone
Posts: 36,419
Columbus, Ohio, US


Kimberley Elodie wrote:
Hey hey I have new photos and naturally I want your opinions!

Give your most HONEST comments on my new lingerie photos.

1 Good 1 Bad on two separate photos... or else you are a http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg.

GO!

Honestly, specifically in regard to those images, I see nothing but bad. Lighting, out of focus, crop/composition not the best,

Nov 29 12 03:13 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 32,233
Lodi, California, US


It appears the only http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg in this thread was the OP.
Dec 02 12 01:23 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Photos 4 The Memories
Posts: 1,279
Kewaskum, Wisconsin, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:
http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b510bd675f3_m.jpg
Good: You have nice white teeth.
Bad: Disastrous photography (terrible lighting, out of focus, and zero postprocessing).

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b51031554b6_m.jpg
Good: You got one more shoot's worth of experience.
Bad: You have zero modeling skills. (That's not confined to this shot.)

Have to agree.

Dec 02 12 01:28 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Photos 4 The Memories
Posts: 1,279
Kewaskum, Wisconsin, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:
It appears the only http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg in this thread was the OP.

This is not going to end well.

Dec 02 12 01:32 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 32,233
Lodi, California, US


Photos 4 The Memories  wrote:
This is not going to end well.

It didn't start well.

"1 Good 1 Bad on two separate photos... or else you are a http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg."

Dec 02 12 03:49 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Dean Johnson Photo
Posts: 56,794
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:
It didn't start well.

"1 Good 1 Bad on two separate photos... or else you are a http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg."

And yet here you are trolling. Please stop.

Dec 02 12 04:14 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Christopher Carter
Posts: 7,657
Indianapolis, Indiana, US


Dean Soapbox Killer Photo wrote:
And yet here you are trolling. Please stop.

Don't feed the trolls.

Dec 02 12 02:00 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Pretty Kimmy
Posts: 80
Tempe, Arizona, US


Lee_Photography wrote:

Total agreement

You still have the bad images in your portfolio after the last thread when you also asked for a critique, unless you delete the bad plus add some quality images the old portfolio will not get any better

Can you specific as to which you think are the "bad photos"

Dec 03 12 01:23 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Pretty Kimmy
Posts: 80
Tempe, Arizona, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:
It didn't start well.

"1 Good 1 Bad on two separate photos... or else you are a http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg."

I'm not sure what your problem is, but I just want to let you in on a little secret: I don't care to listen to you. Get off my jock, stop trying to paint some distorted picture of me.

I suggest that you get some help for your deep rooted personal issues because no one in the right state of mind would relentlessly stalk and harass me the way you do.

I wish you the best of luck.

Dec 03 12 01:28 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Pretty Kimmy
Posts: 80
Tempe, Arizona, US


Victoria Herrera wrote:
So what I'm understanding is that she is in fact the troll??? (looking for compliments, instead of taking the advice she's been given)

You clearly are the http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg. Please stop if you are not going to be helpful to me.

Dec 03 12 01:29 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Pretty Kimmy
Posts: 80
Tempe, Arizona, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:
http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b510bd675f3_m.jpg
Good: You have nice white teeth.
Bad: Disastrous photography (terrible lighting, out of focus, and zero postprocessing).

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b51031554b6_m.jpg
Good: You got one more shoot's worth of experience.
Bad: You have zero modeling skills. (That's not confined to this shot.)

Oh and you make no sense. How do I have "no modeling skills" yet I have "more experience." Go look up the word contradiction. You do that often.

Dec 03 12 01:30 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Pretty Kimmy
Posts: 80
Tempe, Arizona, US


Thank you for all the responses! I will definitely keep your tips in mind on my upcoming photo and video shoots! You all will be seeing more of me very very soon, so please let's keep in touch!
Peace, love, unity, and respect,
-Kimberley
Dec 03 12 01:32 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 32,233
Lodi, California, US


Kimberley Elodie wrote:
Oh and you make no sense. How do I have "no modeling skills" yet I have "more experience." Go look up the word contradiction. You do that often.

Experience... You can get in front of a camera a million times, but without any aptitude for modeling it won't do you any good.

It's not doing you any good. Your portfolio images are still crappy snaps.

Edit: That new avatar at least shows competent photography.

Dec 03 12 03:15 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 32,233
Lodi, California, US


Kimberley Elodie wrote:
relentlessly stalk and harass me the way you do.

You've asked for feedback. Each time I've provided some. That's hardly relentless stalking.

In your previous request for feedback on profile and portfolio, I suggested that you omit information from your profile that's not relevant to modeling (such as your journalism awards) and for that you responded with an ad hominem attack. Other posters have noted that you haven't acted upon any feedback from anyone; the profile hasn't been altered and the crappy pics are still up. Clearly you're not looking for advice and feedback, only egoboost. If that's what you're here for, just say so.

Dec 03 12 03:35 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Good Egg Productions
Posts: 15,312
Orlando, Florida, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:

Experience... You can get in front of a camera a million times, but without any aptitude for modeling it won't do you any good.

It's not doing you any good. Your portfolio images are still crappy snaps.

Edit: That new avatar at least shows competent photography.

But not competent retouching.  The blur areas at the breasts are sloppy at best. 

The OP does not seem to want actual advice or critique here.  She only wants attention, and we fools are giving it to her.  I move for the thread to be locked.

Dec 03 12 04:13 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 32,233
Lodi, California, US


Good Egg Productions wrote:
But not competent retouching.  The blur areas at the breasts are sloppy at best.

I must admit that I was so taken aback by the image at large -- her first image that shows *any* photographic competence -- that I didn't notice the terrible postprocessing.

Dec 03 12 04:44 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Pretty Kimmy
Posts: 80
Tempe, Arizona, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:
You've asked for feedback. Each time I've provided some. That's hardly relentless stalking.

In your previous request for feedback on profile and portfolio, I suggested that you omit information from your profile that's not relevant to modeling (such as your journalism awards) and for that you responded with an ad hominem attack. Other posters have noted that you haven't acted upon any feedback from anyone; the profile hasn't been altered and the crappy pics are still up. Clearly you're not looking for advice and feedback, only egoboost. If that's what you're here for, just say so.

You can never stay on topic, can you?? I'll address this for kicks...I had a problem with how you spoke to me. Have some respect for people and maybe you'll get it back. I doubt you have the courage to talk like this in face to face scenarios. You have been trolling me ever since I first logged onto this forum... why? Why do you have such a problem with me orca bay images? I am definitely not fishing for compliments and it's sad that you have the wrong impression of a woman who strives to excell in whatever she does. So yes, listing my complete skill set is necessary. Anyway, I take constructive criticism with caution, but I do [i]take[/] it.
The real problem here is that you aren't credible. It's because you http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg. Be more specific in your critiques! Try to actually address a modeling relating topic with a modeling related solution . This is supposed to be a community for advancement, networking, and growth... And your piss poor outlook and attitidude is staining the reputation of this site.

Dec 03 12 09:18 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Pretty Kimmy
Posts: 80
Tempe, Arizona, US


Good Egg Productions wrote:

But not competent retouching.  The blur areas at the breasts are sloppy at best. 

The OP does not seem to want actual advice or critique here.  She only wants attention, and we fools are giving it to her.  I move for the thread to be locked.

Crappy snaps? Looks like someone is just disappointed that he couldn't see a little more in the photo... But thanks for the backhanded compliment. While I do maintain that everyone is entitled to their own opinions, your opinion is a flat out unsupported assumption at best. I love how you are literally pulling these claims out of nowhere about me. Really? Is this your way of proving that you're trying to be helpful. STAY ON TOPIC. I cannot stress this more to you. If you don't have any critiques that will help me in perfecting my craft, please just simmer down and shut up.

Dec 03 12 09:23 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Good Egg Productions
Posts: 15,312
Orlando, Florida, US


Kimberley Elodie wrote:

Good Egg Productions wrote:
But not competent retouching.  The blur areas at the breasts are sloppy at best. 

The OP does not seem to want actual advice or critique here.  She only wants attention, and we fools are giving it to her.  I move for the thread to be locked.

Crappy snaps? Looks like someone is just disappointed that he couldn't see a little more in the photo... But thanks for the backhanded compliment. While I do maintain that everyone is entitled to their own opinions, your opinion is a flat out unsupported assumption at best. I love how you are literally pulling these claims out of nowhere about me. Really? Is this your way of proving that you're trying to be helpful. STAY ON TOPIC. I cannot stress this more to you. If you don't have any critiques that will help me in perfecting my craft, please just simmer down and shut up.

I quoted the whole thing because it seems like you are responding to someone else.  I didn't say anything about crappy snaps.

Whether I can see the breast or not doesn't interest me.  What interests me is a good image.  That white one is almost a good one, but the terrible retouching to maintain your modesty is what ruins it.  There are good ways to do it.  This just wasn't one of them.

Dec 03 12 09:59 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Axioma
Posts: 6,776
Gent, East Flanders, Belgium


The quality of your images looks poor, mostly because background and styling looks sloppy and your photographer probably wasn't all that technically skilled. On to, it looks like zero effort went into the whole thing, not during and not after the shoot in post.

But I'll concentrate my critique on what you could have done better:
You show little body awareness in the pictures you have up. You often place full weight on your arms, causin the upperarm to distort. You hide your neck which adds to the idea of bad posture. Your facial expressions fail to engage your audience as they look unintentional. You fail to elongate your body and make interesting lines with your poses. You never flex your muscles and put 'tention' in, it just falls kind of flat.
Your ballerina poses are terrible: you need to relex shoulders, suck abdomen and bottom in, turn your legs and feet en dehors, and keep your spine straight.

These poses start to look decent imo:
http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121102/05/5093bbe9ddb21_m.jpg
http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121107/17/509b059e6bdf8_m.jpg

Try to do more like that, and less like the rest:
http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b510c533d4f_m.jpg
Dec 03 12 10:19 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Christopher Carter
Posts: 7,657
Indianapolis, Indiana, US


Wait, why does your profile say you do nudes, but your avatar has blurred out no no parts?
Dec 03 12 10:46 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Greg Kolack
Posts: 17,752
Downers Grove, Illinois, US


First of all, the fact that you state if someone doesn't do exactly as you demand otherwise they are a http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg is not a good start. It comes off pretty much that this a vanity thread, disguised by the fact you try to cover it by saying you want to get a critical opinion of your work. But the fact that you say if we don't also praise at least one of your images otherwise we are trolls makes it look like a vanity thread. That may not be true, but that's what it comes off as.

You also seem to be defending your work a lot. That's not what a critique thread is for. When you defend it, it comes off as not really wanting an opinion.

Next, when you start critique threads and never take any of the advice, that really will lead people to believe you have no interest in critical opinions, and therefore tirns people off.

And going off on people - like Orca Bay, who has a lot to offer - as someone stalking you really doesn't help your cause. Its pretty presumptuous to assume someone is spending time to follow you around.

You will probably just ignore all this or maybe even go off on me, but the personality you present is often more important than your work. And your personality is coming off as very divaish and difficult. To be quite honest, at your stage, you need photographers much more than they need you, so I wouldn't burn any bridges before they are even built. Tone down the attitude, and you may find photographers who can help you.

I would also be more honest in your stats. There is no way they are correct, based on your photos. It doesn't accomplish anything to lie about that.

Finally, as far as your images go, a lot of the problems have to do with your photographers. They don't flatter you at all. I see no direction, and poor lighting. A lot is clearly on camera flash, which is the least flattering type of lighting. It doesn't make ANYONE look good. There is also no direction.

This all goes back to the fact you need better photographers, and you are not going to get them with the attitude you display.

It looks like you have quantity for the sheer reason of quantity. Many very similar looks - pick one from each set-up/look. No need to have 5 shots with the same outfit/lighting/look. And the ballet shots have to go - they add nothing.

This is the most interesting shot you have:

http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30495210

That's because there is some effort and semblance of creativity from the photographer.

The basic point? Don't assume everyone who doesn't praise you is out to stalk you or http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg. Don't get defensive and accept criticism, and you may learn something from the knowledgeable people here.

This may not be what you want to hear, but hopefully it will help.
Dec 03 12 11:23 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 32,233
Lodi, California, US


Mnemosyne Photography wrote:
Wait, why does your profile say you do nudes, but your avatar has blurred out no no parts?

To be fair (as has been the policy throughout this thread), the "no-no parts" have to be obscured from an avatar image. It's the one thing the OP has done right. It just was done very badly, which is par for the course for the OP.

Dec 04 12 04:36 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 32,233
Lodi, California, US


Greg Kolack wrote:
You also seem to be defending your work a lot. That's not what a critique thread is for. When you defend it, it comes off as not really wanting an opinion.

She hasn't been defending her work so much as she just launches into ad hominem attacks which the mods have totally ignored. But the end result is the same: no interest in getting opinions and learning from them. She still has the non-modeling noise in her profile and she's still got the terrible images in her port.

Dec 04 12 04:41 am  Link  Quote 
Model
Victoria MHP
Posts: 886
Houston, Texas, US


Kimberley Elodie wrote:
You clearly are the http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg. Please stop if you are not going to be helpful to me.

I actually did offer an opinion by agreeing with someone, you just chose to ignore it.

But if you want some helpful advice...

Please look into modeling classes if you wish to continue, so you can learn about expressions and body poses. Invest (pay) in a photographer, makeup/hair stylist and wardrobe stylist to help give you some decent images.

I do not like being negative, but sometimes being blunt with someone is the only way to get your point across. The images you have now are just horrible. Bad photography, modeling (poses and expressions), makeup, clothes...just everything. If you take mine and others' advice, I hope you will decide to just do away and start your 'portfolio' over.

Dec 04 12 10:21 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 32,233
Lodi, California, US


Kimberley Elodie wrote:
Be more specific in your critiques! Try to actually address a modeling relating topic with a modeling related solution .

You asked.

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b510bd675f3_m.jpg
This image is terribly lighted, badly out of focus, your skin is oily and shiny, and there's been zero post done. Even the necklace's clasp is in front instead of in back; no attention to detail. Most experienced models can recognize an image as patently bad as this and not post it. This isn't a simple matter of some fingers cropped or color temperature slightly off. This is an obviously unusable image. For an experienced pro model, you seem incapable of recognizing bad product.

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121102/05/5093bc262e32c_m.jpg
Dull mouthbreathing expression. It's a common trait in many of your images. And the way you're holding that bottle is awkward and graceless. Get that elbow down.

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121127/11/50b51031554b6_m.jpg
In both reclined lingerie poses, you square the back of your hand to the camera rather than rest the hand so it's more edge-on to the camera. You also hang that hand over your ample belly in both images. And then there's the missing right arm. This is a prime example of how not to pose.

http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121203/12/50bd096be6809_m.jpg
Decent setup but terrible postprocessing regarding the inept masking of the nipples, egregiously bad editing an experienced pro model should not allow on her port. And that "stunned fish" mouthbreather expression doesn't exactly mesh well with the overall look of the shot.

I hope that's specific enough for you.

Dec 04 12 01:59 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Christopher Carter
Posts: 7,657
Indianapolis, Indiana, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:

To be fair (as has been the policy throughout this thread), the "no-no parts" have to be obscured from an avatar image. It's the one thing the OP has done right. It just was done very badly, which is par for the course for the OP.

Yes, but it's blurred in her port too. Most people upload the avatar safe one, and then upload the original to their port.

Dec 05 12 09:38 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 32,233
Lodi, California, US


Mnemosyne Photography wrote:

Yes, but it's blurred in her port too. Most people upload the avatar safe one, and then upload the original to their port.

True enough. However, the OP has shown herself to be immune to all other advice. Why should anyone expect her to figure out how to use the blurred image as avatar and the unblurred version in her port?

Dec 05 12 01:10 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
E e v a
Posts: 1,724
Nashville, Tennessee, US


Kimberley Elodie wrote:
The real problem here is that you aren't credible. It's because you http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg. Be more specific in your critiques! Try to actually address a modeling relating topic with a modeling related solution . This is supposed to be a community for advancement, networking, and growth... And your piss poor outlook and attitidude is staining the reputation of this site.

Enough! You are not taking constructive criticism. You need posing help. You need expression help. Orca Bay Images was right in their critique. It does look like you're mouth breathing in your shots. I've had problems with it too. If you dont want to look like that and have problems closing lips for expressions (I cannot do it myself), breathe in on the snap of the photo. And Orca is not a http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg. Seriously. Now stop with the defensive act, and use the critique to better yourself.

Dec 05 12 04:49 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Christopher Carter
Posts: 7,657
Indianapolis, Indiana, US


Orca Bay Images wrote:

True enough. However, the OP has shown herself to be immune to all other advice. Why should anyone expect her to figure out how to use the blurred image as avatar and the unblurred version in her port?

Hope?

Dec 05 12 09:49 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Greg Kolack
Posts: 17,752
Downers Grove, Illinois, US


It appears the OP has left this building and won't return.
Dec 05 12 10:00 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Photos 4 The Memories
Posts: 1,279
Kewaskum, Wisconsin, US


Greg Kolack wrote:
It appears the OP has left this building and won't return.

Her account is still active or is that not what you are talking about?

Dec 05 12 10:06 pm  Link  Quote 
12last   Search   Reply



main | browse | casting/travel | forums | shout box | help | advertising | contests | share | join the mayhem

more modelmayhem on: | | | edu

©2006-2014 ModelMayhem.com. All Rights Reserved.
MODEL MAYHEM is a registered trademark.
Toggle Worksafe Mode: Off | On
Terms | Privacy | Careers