login info join!
Forums > Digital Art and Retouching > How do you edit out...camel toe? Search   Reply
12last
Photographer
Erica Velasco Photog
Posts: 162
Phoenix, Arizona, US


Ok so I have a client who wants the cameltoe taken out of their engagement photos. To be honest I didn't even notice it when editing.

Perfect example is the second photo on the left.

Any suggestions! I've tried a few times and it just ends up making him look like....he has a big package. Which I guess isn't horrible but it looks edited.

Any help?

Erica
Nov 30 12 06:26 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Michael DBA Expressions
Posts: 3,181
Lynchburg, Virginia, US


Content-aware fill should do it, but a tip for the future: never shoot straight into anybody's crotch. All you really need to remove is the shadow of the crease.
Nov 30 12 07:06 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Leighthenubian
Posts: 2,850
Toronto, Ontario, Canada


Well aside from the prior poster's reply....why do you need to edit that out?

It's not a fashion shoot.
Nov 30 12 07:42 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Designit - Edward Olson
Posts: 1,635
Eureka, California, US


Erica Velasco Photog wrote:
Ok so I have a client who wants the cameltoe taken out of their engagement photos. To be honest I didn't even notice it when editing.

Perfect example is the second photo on the left.

Link to shoot:
http://www.ericavelasco.com/puppy-love- … t-session/

Any suggestions! I've tried a few times and it just ends up making him look like....he has a big package. Which I guess isn't horrible but it looks edited.

Any help?

Erica

Don't eliminate the crease entirely. There is a seam in the cloth of the pants that should remain.

[edited out link]

The angle of the camera is not what causes the shadow. It is the angle of the sun to the crease. In this case, I suspect when the bride-to-be sat down on his leg, it pushed upward on his trousers, causing it to bunch.

Illuminate wrote:
Well aside from the prior poster's reply....why do you need to edit that out?

It's not a fashion shoot.

Because the client ASKED HER TO.

Nov 30 12 07:44 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Good Egg Productions
Posts: 15,453
Orlando, Florida, US


That was not what I was expecting to see.


The first respondent seems to have the correct answer.
Nov 30 12 08:18 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Leighthenubian
Posts: 2,850
Toronto, Ontario, Canada


Designit - Edward Olson wrote:

Erica Velasco Photog wrote:
Ok so I have a client who wants the cameltoe taken out of their engagement photos. To be honest I didn't even notice it when editing.

Perfect example is the second photo on the left.

Link to shoot:
http://www.ericavelasco.com/puppy-love- … t-session/

Any suggestions! I've tried a few times and it just ends up making him look like....he has a big package. Which I guess isn't horrible but it looks edited.

Any help?

Erica

Don't eliminate the crease entirely. There is a seam in the cloth of the pants that should remain. I achieved this:

http://www.designit-digital.com/image1.jpg

I am going to delete this as soon as I know you have seen it.

The angle of the camera is not what causes the shadow. It is the angle of the sun to the crease. In this case, I suspect when the bride-to-be sat down on his leg, it pushed upward on his trousers, causing it to bunch.


Because the client ASKED HER TO.

Thanks I read that BUT doing that on a significant number of images is not cost effective unless she is paying!

Nov 30 12 08:32 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
rp_photo
Posts: 42,490
Houston, Texas, US


Illuminate wrote:
Well aside from the prior poster's reply....why do you need to edit that out?

+1. I thought it was supposed to be a good thing smile

Nov 30 12 08:35 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Art of the nude
Posts: 11,868
Olivet, Michigan, US


Erica Velasco Photog wrote:
Ok so I have a client who wants the cameltoe taken out of their engagement photos. To be honest I didn't even notice it when editing.

Perfect example is the second photo on the left.

Link to shoot:

Any suggestions! I've tried a few times and it just ends up making him look like....he has a big package. Which I guess isn't horrible but it looks edited.

Any help?

Erica

You're posting a public link to someone's proofs, and making comments about their crotch?

Nov 30 12 08:50 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Laura UnBound
Posts: 27,321
Toronto, Ontario, Canada


Art of the nude wrote:
You're posting a public link to someone's proofs, and making comments about their crotch?

Is that any worse than all the "how do I fix this persons awful skin/nose hairs/bloodshot eyes/bald spot/etc?" threads?

Nov 30 12 08:51 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
William Kious
Posts: 8,841
Delphos, Ohio, US


That's moose knuckle... not camel toe.
Nov 30 12 08:55 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Michael Broughton
Posts: 2,229
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada


i don't see any camel toe... ohhhh, you mean moose knuckle.

edit: DAMN YOU WILLIAM KIOUS!!!!
Nov 30 12 08:55 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Cherrystone
Posts: 36,520
Columbus, Ohio, US


Moose knuckle? MOOSE KNUCKLE??????
I'm just so outta the loop when it comes to current names of "things".
Nov 30 12 09:19 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Cherrystone
Posts: 36,520
Columbus, Ohio, US


Erica Velasco Photog wrote:
.......making him look like....he has a big package.

Ya know.....you MIGHT get a bonus for doing that. wink

Just use the patch tool and move it around a little?

Nov 30 12 09:23 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
- Aina -
Posts: 740
Redlands, California, US


I was looking for the girl, when you mentioned camel toe.
Nov 30 12 09:25 pm  Link  Quote 
Retoucher
Vega Retouching
Posts: 260
MILILANI, Hawaii, US


i think they're called moose knuckles big_smile
Nov 30 12 10:16 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
the lonely photographer
Posts: 1,881
Beverly Hills, California, US


I got a camel toe on  model   under her arms! seems the skin folded up into that dreaded look when she lowered her arms. luckily i managed to edit it out   cropped her from the shoulder up!
Nov 30 12 11:03 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
imcFOTO
Posts: 579
Bothell, Washington, US


Erica Velasco Photog wrote:
Ok so I have a client who wants the cameltoe taken out of their engagement photos. To be honest I didn't even notice it when editing.

Perfect example is the second photo on the left.

Link to shoot:
http://www.ericavelasco.com/puppy-love- … t-session/

Any suggestions! I've tried a few times and it just ends up making him look like....he has a big package. Which I guess isn't horrible but it looks edited.

Any help?

Erica

Since the client is sensitive about this, you would have been wise to crop their heads out of the shot. Imagine if one his friends sees this thread - not good for your reputation ... just sayin ..

Nov 30 12 11:16 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Farenell Photography
Posts: 18,022
Albany, New York, US


Illuminate wrote:
Well aside from the prior poster's reply....why do you need to edit that out?

My thoughts exactly.

They're open high heels, you'd expect to see those "little piggies".

Nov 30 12 11:48 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Garry k
Posts: 27,053
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada


Art of the nude wrote:

You're posting a public link to someone's proofs, and making comments about their crotch?

Yes I wonder how that will be for business

Dec 01 12 12:10 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Christopher Carter
Posts: 7,671
Indianapolis, Indiana, US


http://mnemosyne.smugmug.com/photos/i-7wq5spC/0/X3/i-7wq5spC-X3.gif
Dec 01 12 12:36 am  Link  Quote 
Retoucher
Oliver Retouch
Posts: 11
Chicago, Illinois, US


Art of the nude wrote:

You're posting a public link to someone's proofs, and making comments about their crotch?

+1

Dec 01 12 12:58 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Harold Rose
Posts: 2,925
Calhoun, Georgia, US


Erica Velasco Photog wrote:
Ok so I have a client who wants the cameltoe taken out of their engagement photos. To be honest I didn't even notice it when editing.

Perfect example is the second photo on the left.

Link to shoot:
http://www.ericavelasco.com/puppy-love- … t-session/

Any suggestions! I've tried a few times and it just ends up making him look like....he has a big package. Which I guess isn't horrible but it looks edited.

Any help?

Erica

If there is not a hidded agenda for this question,   and you "really do not have the ability to take care of this simple correction"     Hire someone that knows how to do simple retouching...I am sure that your client ok'ed the publ;ishing of these photos...  especially if it ends up as a facebook feature...

Dec 01 12 01:08 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Michael Broughton
Posts: 2,229
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada


the lonely photographer wrote:
I got a camel toe on  model   under her arms! seems the skin folded up into that dreaded look when she lowered her arms. luckily i managed to edit it out   cropped her from the shoulder up!

if underarm folds count as camel toes, should shots like this be considered 18+?http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121017/20/507f7a29652cf.jpg

Dec 01 12 01:14 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Neil Snape
Posts: 9,470
Paris, Île-de-France, France


While I saw it was shot at a zoo I was looking for a real camel, but didn't find any.
If you are describing the folds around his * nuts, well you can just clone stamp in lighten mode until you smooth that out. Leave a hint though of depth so do it at a reasonable opacity and or flow.
Dec 01 12 01:28 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Image Magik
Posts: 1,067
New Orleans, Louisiana, US


Erica Velasco Photog wrote:
Ok so I have a client who wants the cameltoe taken out of their engagement photos. To be honest I didn't even notice it when editing.

Perfect example is the second photo on the left.

Link to shoot:
http://www.ericavelasco.com/puppy-love- … t-session/

Any suggestions! I've tried a few times and it just ends up making him look like....he has a big package. Which I guess isn't horrible but it looks edited.

Any help?


I would put a real camels toe there!! lol
Use content aware fill on the dark crease in the middle or try using the clone tool on the crease in lighten mode at 20-50 percent.
Erica

Dec 01 12 01:42 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Image Magik
Posts: 1,067
New Orleans, Louisiana, US


Michael Broughton wrote:
if underarm folds count as camel toes, should shots like this be considered 18+?http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/121017/20/507f7a29652cf.jpg

You could always use the patch tool to get rid of or reduce the crease in her armpit. Should be 18+ cause of the spider!!! lol

Dec 01 12 01:44 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Image Magik
Posts: 1,067
New Orleans, Louisiana, US


Mnemosyne Photography wrote:
http://mnemosyne.smugmug.com/photos/i-7wq5spC/0/X3/i-7wq5spC-X3.gif

Haha!!! lol

Dec 01 12 01:46 am  Link  Quote 
Digital Artist
Andreea Cernestean
Posts: 495
Baia Mare, Maramureş, Romania


Some of you are being pretty negative, rude if I may add. She's simply seeking advice on fixing an issue with these images at her client's request. If she hadn't posted any pictures this thread would have been spammed with "got any samples to show your problem?" for comments.

To OP, you can clone from the nearby fabric at a low opacity and go over the folds. To erase them completely would look unnatural, but you can make it less bold. And be aware of fabrics that crease like that for future shootings. This could have been dealt with during the shooting by having the guy even his trousers when he sat down wink
Dec 01 12 03:13 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Kent Art Photography
Posts: 2,786
Ashford, England, United Kingdom


Sometimes I worry about people who think MM is the centre of the Universe and everyone knows about it and looks through every forum every day.  I doubt the OP's clients even know MM exists, and they probably wouldn't give a damn about the posting of the pics here if they did know.  Some people just have to negative.

I would clone nearby areas to lighten the crease, although it might look odd and draw attention to the area.  I'd do the "worst" shots and offer them to the clients for approval.  The clients might have unrealistic expectations about what can be done with Photoshop.
Dec 01 12 03:42 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
NYC fine art nudes
Posts: 164
New York, New York, US


Have you tried to Liquify that sloppy sack ?

>Filter

>Liquify

>Forward Warp Tool

(and maybe a little bit of)

>Pucker
Dec 01 12 04:12 am  Link  Quote 
Retoucher
Peano
Posts: 4,106
Lynchburg, Virginia, US


Erica Velasco Photog wrote:
Any suggestions! I've tried a few times and it just ends up making him look like....he has a big package. Which I guess isn't horrible but it looks edited.

Any help?

Probably the clone stamp. Can't tell for sure without seeing a 100% crop of the problem.

Dec 01 12 05:53 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Leighthenubian
Posts: 2,850
Toronto, Ontario, Canada


Kent Art Photography wrote:
Sometimes I worry about people who think MM is the centre of the Universe and everyone knows about it and looks through every forum every day.  I doubt the OP's clients even know MM exists, and they probably wouldn't give a damn about the posting of the pics here if they did know.  Some people just have to negative.

I would clone nearby areas to lighten the crease, although it might look odd and draw attention to the area.  I'd do the "worst" shots and offer them to the clients for approval.  The clients might have unrealistic expectations about what can be done with Photoshop.

You can't really believe that...

Employers can find you, ex's can find you and client's can find you. Especially when you use your name/business as your MM account name.

Personally, I would have cropped to just the "discussed" area and posted that in-line with the original post.

Dec 01 12 06:25 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
descending chain
Posts: 1,181
Fullerton, California, US


Peano wrote:
Probably the clone stamp. Can't tell for sure without seeing a 100% crop of the problem.

Illuminate wrote:
Personally, I would have cropped to just the "discussed" area and posted that in-line with the original post.

The OP should take the opportunity to edit the OP.

Dec 01 12 06:44 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Faze1 photography
Posts: 568
Lawndale, California, US


Peano wrote:

Probably the clone stamp. Can't tell for sure without seeing a 100% crop of the problem.

+1

I'm not saying it's the best way of doing getting rid of the problem but I've ran into situations such as this and I just burned down the highlights and the client never noticed. If anybody can give you an answer, Peano can so I'm sure he can tell you if this will work.

Dec 01 12 10:08 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
M Pandolfo Photography
Posts: 12,116
Tampa, Florida, US


Peano wrote:

Probably the clone stamp. Can't tell for sure without seeing a 100% crop of the problem.

Please enlarge that package for Peano.

Dec 01 12 10:16 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Matt Forma
Posts: 373
Denver, Colorado, US


Moose knuckle haha! Never heard that either
Dec 01 12 01:08 pm  Link  Quote 
Retoucher
Sofia Zasheva
Posts: 154
Sofia, Sofija grad, Bulgaria


Clone stamp, clone stamp + painting + reduced opacity, paint over it + noise + reduced opacity, new layer + healing brush + reduced opacity, choose one but as some people said - don't remove it completely because it will look weird.
Dec 03 12 12:49 pm  Link  Quote 
Retoucher
pxspace
Posts: 1,046
Braşov, Braşov, Romania


Matt Forma wrote:
Moose knuckle haha! Never heard that either

lol

Dec 03 12 01:25 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Erica Velasco Photog
Posts: 162
Phoenix, Arizona, US


One. It's photos on my blog and they have been up there for a while. So I'm not posting proofs no one hasn't already seen.

Two. I thought you couldn't see posts unless you had an account here. So I didn't think it was a danger since why would my clients have an account here.

Three. I would hire someone to edit it, I don't have a problem doing that. But some of the people's help here did assist.

Four. It wasn't something I was looking for during shooting, as I've never had an issue like this ever come up.

Five. I don't feel it's necessary to be rude when someone is posting an honest question. It's unprofessional. I didn't realize this post had gone on and on as I had gotten help and then haven't checked back. I felt I was being professional as this is a private forum and didn't fear my clients would ever see this post. Some of you take yourselves much too seriously.

Six. Thank you to those who were actually trying to be helpful.
Jan 02 13 07:52 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Nico Simon Princely
Posts: 1,793
Las Vegas, Nevada, US


The first poster I think had the solution. I think it's wrong to take away his manhood myself!

WTF? Why does he want his package removed... Just to prove she now has junk in her pocket?
Jan 02 13 08:05 pm  Link  Quote 
12last   Search   Reply