Deirdre Holmes wrote: why not, I'm not ashamed of being a shitty photographer... << runs to find the Rum to cover the deep shame of being a shitty photographer>>
lol http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/1645635/viewall
Shitty togs like you make me want to throw all my equipment away.
Sophistocles
Posts: 21,308
Seattle, Washington, US
I want to complain and get all butthurt, but I had a long day. Can I postpone my tantrum until Wednesday or so? I'll buy the beer to make up for it. Fair?
Sophistocles wrote: I want to complain and get all butthurt, but I had a long day. Can I postpone my tantrum until Wednesday or so? I'll buy the beer to make up for it. Fair?
Sure, I will give you until 11pm Pacific time on Wednesday.
Shitty togs like you make me want to throw all my equipment away.
I'm going to assume this is a compliment ... Unless you mean - 'I have to throw my equipment away... because, I find your photos so offensively bad I can not even bare to look at another photo again for fear my eyes will burn, as if by acid, and melt out of my head while I scream in agony.'
I'm going to assume this is a compliment ... Unless you mean - 'I have to throw my equipment away... because, I find your photos so offensively bad I can not even bare to look at another photo again for fear my eyes will burn, as if by acid, and melt out of my head while I scream in agony.'
Sophistocles
Posts: 21,308
Seattle, Washington, US
Garry k wrote: I am pretty rank
do me
That pickup like has worked before. Trufax.
As an aside, this ranking is fascinating, as, more than anything else, it gives a great insight into Dan's tastes. I'd love to see a few others do this and rank people.
As an aside, this ranking is fascinating, as, more than anything else, it gives a great insight into Dan's tastes. I'd love to see a few others do this and rank people.
Dan K Photography wrote: I have always found it impossible to be consistent across multiple pages of 1-100 critics etc and have probably failed to do so. A ranking system will help me do so.
Here is how it works. I will rank models and photographers only. It will be one column for each ranked from what my worthless opinion considers best (top of column) to worst.
This is just for fun and no one should take it to seriously. Though I do tend to take it seriously myself.
I enjoy butthurt responses and encourage them if you so wish. I will even accept arguments by pm on why so and so should be ranked higher. But not from the ranked person himself. It is possible though unlikely to change my mind. Especially if you ask for my paypal email.
If you are in please give me your name and a link to your port like so
As an aside, this ranking is fascinating, as, more than anything else, it gives a great insight into Dan's tastes. I'd love to see a few others do this and rank people.
BS ,mine is the definitive list. It is what it is. Everyone else's would just be opinion.
What saves you from a lower ranking is your models. I got to say every time I look at your port I want to think this is your trolling account and you have another amazing port using the same models.
AS a tough love thing I got to ask are you trying at all? Did getting access to models from doing Vancouver fashion week swell your head and made you think you no longer needed to improve?
I don't know why but it pisses me off to see those models wasted. There is another on my other thread who seems to be in the same boat as you.
Sophistocles wrote: That pickup like has worked before. Trufax.
As an aside, this ranking is fascinating, as, more than anything else, it gives a great insight into Dan's tastes. I'd love to see a few others do this and rank people.
I would be willing to rank people
but then there would be too many lists going at the same time?
... Unless you mean - 'I have to throw my equipment away... because, I find your photos so offensively bad I can not even bare to look at another photo again for fear my eyes will burn, as if by acid, and melt out of my head while I scream in agony.'
?
| 
| 
| edu