login info join!
This thread was locked on 2012-12-03 06:24:21. Reason: Trainwreck-this is done
Forums > General Industry > Wank banks Search   Reply
first123
Model
NayNay
Posts: 82
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia


DarkSlide wrote:

You're right. I don't know anything.

I never said you don't know anything. Please, if i did tell me where?

Dec 03 12 06:19 am  Link  Quote 
Model
NayNay
Posts: 82
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia


DarkSlide wrote:

C'mon, you didn't really write this!

Why the hell not?

Dec 03 12 06:19 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Aaron Lewis Photography
Posts: 5,083
Catskill, New York, US


NayNay wrote:

I am not making it my "job" its an opinion. If everyone minded their own business the world would go to shit, murder, rape, stealing, violence would all be more prominent as everyone would be minding their own business.
There are children on MM, anyone under the age of 18 inst an adult yet. I am classified as a child and am looking out for my fellow youngsters i guess.

You're clasified as a minor. Not a child. A child is under 16, which is why you have to be 16 and not 18 to sign up. Get your facts straight

Dec 03 12 06:19 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Jeffrey M Fletcher
Posts: 4,344
Asheville, North Carolina, US


NayNay wrote:
I'm not saying that fetish is wrong.
I'm not saying that Iphone pictures are not quality.
I'm not saying that bad pictures = Malicious intent.
I'm not saying MM must do anything.
I'm not saying that my spelling is the best in the world.

All i was trying to get across is that people with sexual intent are gwcs and should probably be filtered out because it may lower the standards of MM and prevent people from signing up to MM.

Actually you've said at several points that in addition to those things you mention that it's a safety issue. And of course by writing "filtering" you are proposing that MM take action. Perhaps you could clarify?

Dec 03 12 06:20 am  Link  Quote 
Model
Axioma
Posts: 6,776
Gent, East Flanders, Belgium


NayNay wrote:
(I'm not saying that fetish is wrong.)
I'm not saying that Iphone pictures are not quality.
I'm not saying that bad pictures = Malicious intent.
I'm not saying MM must do anything.

That's funny, because you did ^^.

Dec 03 12 06:20 am  Link  Quote 
Model
SSModel
Posts: 30
Los Angeles, California, US


I think this is a http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-iw5TaUpM1OI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABg/oWjr6XtVW8o/s120-c/photo.jpg post.

If you don't want to do photos that guys will wank to then just don't do them and live your life the way you like. Stop trying to enforce your beliefs on others.
Dec 03 12 06:20 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
DarkSlide
Posts: 2,204
Alexandria, Virginia, US


NayNay wrote:

Why the hell not?

Because it validates my statement.

Dec 03 12 06:21 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
B R U N E S C I
Posts: 25,319
Bath, England, United Kingdom


NayNay wrote:
All i was trying to get across is that people with sexual intent are gwcs and should probably be filtered out because it may lower the standards of MM and prevent people from signing up to MM.

Intent is irrelevant as far as MM is concerned, as long as the person isn't doing anybody any harm.

If you're that worried about the intentions of photographers, maybe modelling isn't an appropriate path for you to take at this time?

FYI, here's an excellent post by Madame Bink, one of the best known and most successful art nude models in the UK. She's been modelling (mostly nude) for 5 years and has never had a serious problem with a photographer because she uses her head and takes reasonable precautions, including checking references, before working with somebody for the first time.

Starting Modelling: Staying Safe - by Madame Bink



Ciao
Stefano

www.stefanobrunesci.com

Dec 03 12 06:21 am  Link  Quote 
first123   Search   Reply