login info join!
Forums > No Forum!> No thread name Search   Reply
Photographer
AWHill Photography
Posts: 135
New York, New York, US


Insane. Quite a new level of obstruction from the republican minority. During the last debt ceiling negotiation in 2011 McConnell offered an up or down vote to allow President Obama to raise the debt ceiling and avoid the arbitrary terrorist hostage taking of the nations credit by republicans. That proposal died.

This morning McConnell asked to have a vote on his old proposal. Harry Reid obliged him, set up the vote, and before it could happen McConnell filibustered his own proposal. What madness this this when he can filibuster over 380 bills and think this is the spirit of bi-partisanship. Never in the republic has there been this much obstruction of the peoples will.  Harry Reid actually had to issue the Orwellian statement:


“The Senate should pass Senator McConnell’s proposal to give the President the authority to avoid the knock-down, drag-out fight we had over the debt ceiling last year—a fight that caused the first-ever downgrade of this country’s credit, and cost our economy billions. Senator McConnell’s filibuster prevented us from having this vote today, but I will continue to seek an agreement to hold an up-or-down vote on his proposal to avoid another debt ceiling debacle."



Read more of the story with all the facts sourced:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/0 … p-proposal


Republicans? Please explain why the debt ceiling - which under every other administration was never held hostage - is suddenly a bargaining chip to use in an attempt to gut social security and medicare?
Dec 06 12 01:58 pm  Link  Quote 
Artist/Painter
Art of CIP
Posts: 21,234
Long Beach, California, US


Hilarious...
Dec 06 12 02:00 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Greg Kolack
Posts: 17,242
Downers Grove, Illinois, US


AWHill Photography wrote:
Republicans? Please explain why the debt ceiling - which under every other administration was never held hostage - is suddenly a bargaining chip to use in an attempt to gut social security and medicare?

Because they want to make Obama a one term President.

Oh, wait...

Dec 06 12 02:07 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
What Fun Productions
Posts: 19,325
Phoenix, Arizona, US


AWHill Photography wrote:
Insane. Quite a new level of obstruction from the republican minority. During the last debt ceiling negotiation in 2011 McConnell offered an up or down vote to allow President Obama to raise the debt ceiling and avoid the arbitrary terrorist hostage taking of the nations credit by republicans. That proposal died.

This morning McConnell asked to have a vote on his old proposal. Harry Reid obliged him, set up the vote, and before it could happen McConnell filibustered his own proposal. What madness this this when he can filibuster over 380 bills and think this is the spirit of bi-partisanship. Never in the republic has there been this much obstruction of the peoples will.  Harry Reid actually had to issue the Orwellian statement:


“The Senate should pass Senator McConnell’s proposal to give the President the authority to avoid the knock-down, drag-out fight we had over the debt ceiling last year—a fight that caused the first-ever downgrade of this country’s credit, and cost our economy billions. Senator McConnell’s filibuster prevented us from having this vote today, but I will continue to seek an agreement to hold an up-or-down vote on his proposal to avoid another debt ceiling debacle."



Read more of the story with all the facts sourced:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/0 … p-proposal


Republicans? Please explain why the debt ceiling - which under every other administration was never held hostage - is suddenly a bargaining chip to use in an attempt to gut social security and medicare?

Not all the facts are correct in the OP.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12 … sis-talks/

Dec 06 12 02:08 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Lightcraft Studio
Posts: 11,167
Los Angeles, California, US


AWHill Photography wrote:
Republicans? Please explain why the debt ceiling - which under every other administration was never held hostage - is suddenly a bargaining chip to use in an attempt to gut social security and medicare?

Because we're in a new era, one where the debt is rapidly reaching a point where it's becoming a real danger to this country.

Irregardless of who you want to blame for our situation, it's still the situation we face today and it has to be dealt with. Simply raising the debt ceiling over and over can't be the only solution... we need to address the problem sooner rather than later.

Dec 06 12 02:09 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
figurativearts
Posts: 5,552
Cottonwood, Arizona, US


What Fun Productions wrote:

Not all the facts are correct in the OP.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12 … sis-talks/

foxnews is now factcheck.org?

Dec 06 12 05:28 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
sublime LightWorks
Posts: 6,017
Atlanta, Georgia, US


figurativearts wrote:

foxnews is now factcheck.org?

Did you read the article and compare it to others?  You'll find its accurate and the OP's cite is missing details that changes the context.

Facts are facts regardless of where they are printed. You have a problem with facts?

Dec 06 12 06:16 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
sublime LightWorks
Posts: 6,017
Atlanta, Georgia, US


Art of CIP wrote:
Hilarious...

Read all of the articles before you choke on that laughter. The OP is missing several facts.

Dec 06 12 06:17 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
afplcc
Posts: 5,729
Fairfax, Virginia, US


What Fun Productions wrote:
Not all the facts are correct in the OP.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12 … sis-talks/

Fox is trying to spin this story but they're still off.

1.  It was a McConnell proposal.
2.  He expected that the Democrats would oppose it.  So he proposed it. 
3.  Initially, Reid asked for a delay, consulted and then agreed to allow the proposal to come forth for a vote and he asked for an up or down vote.
4.  McConnell insisted it required 60 votes (which under the rules the Senate is operating under means that McConnell filibustered his own proposal).  Under the current rules that the Senate is operating under, a filibuster can be considered to occur if someone insists that a proposal or bill requires 60 votes (rather than actually requiring that someone stand up and talk non-stop requiring a vote of cloture). 

Ed

Dec 06 12 07:25 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
What Fun Productions
Posts: 19,325
Phoenix, Arizona, US


afplcc wrote:

Fox is trying to spin this story but they're still off.

1.  It was a McConnell proposal.

It was Obama's proposal.

Dec 06 12 07:58 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Tropic Light
Posts: 6,291
Kailua, Hawaii, US


What Fun Productions wrote:
It was Obama's proposal.

McConnell proposed having a vote.  Majority Leader Reid called his bluff and agreed to an up or down vote.  McConnell then filibustered his own proposal, which made him look like a total ass-clown.  Obama was not in the Senate chamber, and even if he had been, he couldn't vote.

Dec 06 12 11:48 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
afplcc
Posts: 5,729
Fairfax, Virginia, US


What Fun Productions wrote:

It was Obama's proposal.

Again, this is Fox trying to spin this.  Obama also proposed that we have a tax on everyone making $250k.  But that tax doesn't happen unless someone places a bill or proposal before Congress.

1.  It was McConnell that initially proposed 2 years ago that instead of Congress raising the debt ceiling, the President would unilaterally do this and the Congress could take a symbolic vote of approval or disapproval (but the President would still own the result).

2.  Obama this time around suggested the McConnell idea again.  It's called bipartisanship....taking some ideas from the other party and offering to implement them.  It also takes the heat off of Congress (they don't get blamed for the rising debt--they can just accuse the President of being the guilty party).

3.  McConnell chose that one particular element of the debt package submitted by Geithner to Congress to suddenly insist that Dems vote on it.  He did this as a political move--thinking that (a) the Dems wouldn't want this to happen (which would be bad PR....they're opposing one of the President's ideas) and (b) it would go down in defeat.  So McConnell offered a proposal in Congress separate from the rest of Obama's package, just to vote to approve this one element.  It was proposed by McConnell and it had his name associated with it.

4.  Reid originally said that he'd need to look at it.  After conferring, he came back and said--sure, let's take a vote on it.

5.  At which point McConnell filibustered his own proposal.

Be clear--the ONLY reason this was up for a potential vote was b/c McConnell proposed it.  The ONLY reason no floor vote was taken was b/c McConnell filibustered it.

Ed

Dec 07 12 02:48 am  Link  Quote 
  Search   Reply



main | browse | casting/travel | forums | shout box | help | advertising | contests | share | join the mayhem

more modelmayhem on: | | | edu

©2006-2013 ModelMayhem.com. All Rights Reserved.
MODEL MAYHEM is a registered trademark.
Toggle Worksafe Mode: Off | On
Terms | Privacy | Internet Rank | Careers