login info join!
Forums > Critique > Critique - the Simon Cowell scale Search   Reply
first12
Photographer
Steven Lemmens
Posts: 137
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium


Have I got enough talent or is my x-factor keeping me from making the best out of it.
Dec 09 12 05:02 am  Link  Quote 
Model
HEATHER 19
Posts: 1,134
Boston, Massachusetts, US


No toooooo sure
Dec 09 12 05:28 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Aaron Lewis Photography
Posts: 5,083
Catskill, New York, US


This thread just died huh?
Dec 10 12 05:20 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Aaron Lewis Photography wrote:
Go ahead. No point in missing one of these threads now smile

††
that was a complete and utter nightmare

Learn how to take a photo with good exposure first.

Dec 23 12 03:55 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Maura Housley wrote:
Sounds interesting...


atrocious


It's a bit all over the place, learn how to direct people

Dec 23 12 03:57 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


APS-Chicago wrote:
Ok "Simon", let's hear it...


average

it's VERY boring

Dec 23 12 03:59 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


David Kirk wrote:
Hit me.

You're in between


average

and

★★
good

some variety would be nice

Dec 23 12 04:01 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


mphunt wrote:
Go ahead.

★★
good

90% of your portfolio is figure art, after the first 3 it gets repetitive (one trick pony)

Dec 23 12 04:05 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


SYCF wrote:
You have good work.. judge away judge

★★
good

I think you have a good sense for fashion (artistic) photography and you direct your models well. Your technical skills are lagging though.

Dec 23 12 04:10 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Steven Lemmens wrote:
Have I got enough talent or is my x-factor keeping me from making the best out of it.


average

Portfolio is not really cohesive, and I can't really figure out what you're going for. I'm sorry to say, you don't have the X-factor.
Work on it and come back next year.

Dec 23 12 04:14 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


HEATHER 18 wrote:
No toooooo sure

[Audition for →PHOTOGRAPHERS← only]

Dec 23 12 04:15 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Aaron Lewis Photography wrote:
This thread just died huh?

nah got distracted wink

Dec 24 12 12:23 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Jorge Kreimer
Posts: 2,268
Los Angeles, California, US


Probably not too good. Most photographers don't like my port.
Dec 24 12 01:34 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Jorge Kreimer wrote:
Probably not too good. Most photographers don't like my port.

★★
good

try to step out of your comfort zone and try new things cus it's bordering on:


average

learning better lighting skills also wouldn't hurt

Dec 24 12 01:41 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1,727
Washington, District of Columbia, US


Ok :-/

I know I have a lot to work on , curious to what you think I should work on
Dec 24 12 01:50 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Rachel Reilly wrote:
Ok :-/

I know I have a lot to work on , curious to what you think I should work on


average

Very mediocre. Work on directing your models and learn basic lighting. Find a good stylist too because the styling is horrendous. Drop the © thingy/name too, that's tacky.

Dec 24 12 01:58 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Amul La La
Posts: 805
Plymouth, England, United Kingdom


Starsquid wrote:
★★
good

I think you have a good sense for fashion (artistic) photography and you direct your models well. Your technical skills are lagging though.

SYCF, technical skills are lagging, a little mystifying!

Dec 24 12 02:16 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


A M U L wrote:

technical skills are lagging, Mystifying!

hmm, your port looked better the other day.

Dec 24 12 02:19 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
M-A-R-C
Posts: 154
Norwich, Connecticut, US


Can't understand why people set them themselves up to be shot down by a mediocre (at best) photographer. Maybe if the person doing the critiquing was actually GOOD, it might have some value.
Note: I say all this knowing that I'm mediocre (at best) myself.
Dec 24 12 02:20 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


M-A-R-C wrote:
Can't understand why people set them themselves up to be shot down by a mediocre (at best) photographer. Maybe if the person doing the critiquing was actually GOOD, it might have some value.
Note: I say all this knowing that I'm mediocre (at best) myself.

Everybody is entitled to an opinion, if you don't like it then keep your eyes shut.


average

And you're right, you're mediocre, so you might wanna scrap 'Very Experienced'.

Dec 24 12 02:27 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
M-A-R-C
Posts: 154
Norwich, Connecticut, US


Starsquid wrote:

Everybody is entitled to an opinion, if you don't like it then keep your eyes shut.


average

And you're right, you're mediocre, so you might wanna scrap 'Very Experienced'.

You're right. I changed that. smile

Dec 24 12 02:49 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Autumn Rose Brightly
Posts: 1,097
Crowley, Texas, US


I'll play
Dec 24 12 08:47 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Autumn Rose Brightly wrote:
I'll play

Sorry Autumn Rose, audition for photographers only

Dec 25 12 02:53 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Amul La La
Posts: 805
Plymouth, England, United Kingdom


Starsquid wrote:

hmm, your port looked better the other day.

Inessential comment ,as you were fella.

Dec 25 12 03:43 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Still you played big_smile
Dec 25 12 03:52 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Amul La La
Posts: 805
Plymouth, England, United Kingdom


Starsquid wrote:
Still you played big_smile

Na uh, my initial comment, was just that, a comment, in regard to your commentary/critique of SYCF's work!

Dec 25 12 04:06 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


A M U L wrote:
Na uh, my initial comment, was just that, a comment, in regard to your commentary/critique of SYCF's work!

Ahh, that's why I was wondering why the rating was off. Got mixed up.

Anyways


atrocious

A bit artsy-farsty

Dec 25 12 04:16 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Amul La La
Posts: 805
Plymouth, England, United Kingdom


Starsquid wrote:
Ahh, that's why I was wondering why the rating was off. Got mixed up.

Anyways


atrocious

A bit artsy-farsty

It seems you have a hearing problem, and your starting to grate on me, I did not ask for your critique nor did I want or need it, so it is wildly irrelevant. Granted it's your thread, but your bordering on idiocy, and it almost seems like your trolling me. As you and anybody seeing this thread will plainly see, my intention was not to cause any kind of conflict, I happen to see a post you'd written and basically queried the critique. But you seem to be taking this to a personal note, which again is extraneous.


My work is atrocious, hmmm, I think you have to many people gassing you, dream on fella.

Dec 25 12 05:13 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Dean Johnson Photo
Posts: 56,746
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US


Moderator Warning!

A M U L wrote:

Na uh, my initial comment, was just that, a comment, in regard to your commentary/critique of SYCF's work!

Please don't post in critique threads if you don't want a critique.

Dec 25 12 05:46 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Dean Johnson Photo
Posts: 56,746
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US


Moderator Warning!

M-A-R-C wrote:
Can't understand why people set them themselves up to be shot down by a mediocre (at best) photographer. Maybe if the person doing the critiquing was actually GOOD, it might have some value.
Note: I say all this knowing that I'm mediocre (at best) myself.

Unsolicited critiques are against the rules. The OP did not ask for your opinion. If you don't want a critique from him, then post somewhere else.

Dec 25 12 05:49 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Aaron Lewis Photography
Posts: 5,083
Catskill, New York, US


A M U L wrote:
It seems you have a hearing problem, and your starting to grate on me, I did not ask for your critique nor did I want or need it, so it is wildly irrelevant. Granted it's your thread, but your bordering on idiocy, and it almost seems like your trolling me. As you and anybody seeing this thread will plainly see, my intention was not to cause any kind of conflict, I happen to see a post you'd written and basically queried the critique. But you seem to be taking this to a personal note, which again is extraneous.


My work is atrocious, hmmm, I think you have to many people gassing you, dream on fella.

Yeah I'm kinda getting the feeling that the OP has no clue as a to what makes a good image. My work is apparently atrocious too. I'm not claiming to be awesome but I know I'm not atrocious AND everything in my port is in fact properly exposed. Unlike someone else I know

Dec 25 12 07:05 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Stephen K Photography
Posts: 144
Sacramento, California, US


Count me in!
Dec 25 12 10:48 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Aaron Lewis Photography wrote:
Yeah I'm kinda getting the feeling that the OP has no clue as a to what makes a good image. My work is apparently atrocious too. I'm not claiming to be awesome but I know I'm not atrocious AND everything in my port is in fact properly exposed. Unlike someone else I know

Well it does say 'Simon Cowell Scale' so you know its gonna be a tad ugly when it comes to criticism. That said, there are good ratings, it just so happens that you weren't in one of em. When I enter someone else's critique rating and get a bad rating (even though I think in my opinion didn't deserve it), I deal with it, since it's someone else's opinion. You're pooped that you got a bad rating, deal with it.

Dec 25 12 03:15 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Stephen K Photography wrote:
Count me in!

★★
good

Sometimes a bit contrasty, but good feel overall

Dec 25 12 03:18 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Aaron Lewis Photography
Posts: 5,083
Catskill, New York, US


Starsquid wrote:
Well it does say 'Simon Cowell Scale' so you know its gonna be a tad ugly when it comes to criticism. That said, there are good ratings, it just so happens that you weren't in one of em. When I enter someone else's critique rating and get a bad rating (even though I think in my opinion didn't deserve it), I deal with it, since it's someone else's opinion. You're pooped that you got a bad rating, deal with it.

not at all my friend. I've been drug through the mud by everyone here. I've learned, I've improved and I know the difference between a good and a bad image. Some of the ports that you're giving "atrocious" ratings,including mine may not be top notch but are no where near the level of atrocious. That's all I'm saying.

I can take all the negative feedback you want to dish out but I think the Simon Cowell Scale is a little skewed.

It's all good, move on.

Dec 25 12 06:18 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Aaron Lewis Photography wrote:
not at all my friend. I've been drug through the mud by everyone here. I've learned, I've improved and I know the difference between a good and a bad image. Some of the ports that you're giving "atrocious" ratings,including mine may not be top notch but are no where near the level of atrocious. That's all I'm saying.

I can take all the negative feedback you want to dish out but I think the Simon Cowell Scale is a little skewed.

It's all good, move on.

First of all you shouldn't take all this too seriously as neither of us all do. And yes the Simon Cowell Scale is harsh (that's why it's SIMON COWELL) and everything was listed there so you knew what you were subjected to. And you got a fairly 'mild' one. If you're so pooped about the bad rating it means you're insecure about your work. You willingly entered yourself, if you don't like to hear (in your case) bad critique, then don't enter critique forum.

Dec 26 12 02:38 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
M Worsley Photography
Posts: 7
Virginia Beach, Virginia, US


Critique me please
Dec 26 12 05:13 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Aaron Lewis Photography
Posts: 5,083
Catskill, New York, US


M-A-R-C wrote:
Can't understand why people set them themselves up to be shot down by a mediocre (at best) photographer. Maybe if the person doing the critiquing was actually GOOD, it might have some value.
Note: I say all this knowing that I'm mediocre (at best) myself.

I was going to say that but didn't want to get dinged smile

Dec 27 12 10:30 am  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Starsquid
Posts: 356
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


Aaron Lewis Photography wrote:

I was going to say that but didn't want to get dinged smile

so you let somebody else take the shot, heroic

Dec 27 12 02:48 pm  Link  Quote 
Model
Maria Susanti
Posts: 540
Banyuwangi, Jawa Timur, Indonesia


me?
Dec 27 12 03:39 pm  Link  Quote 
first12   Search   Reply



main | browse | casting/travel | forums | shout box | help | advertising | contests | share | join the mayhem

more modelmayhem on: | | | edu

©2006-2014 ModelMayhem.com. All Rights Reserved.
MODEL MAYHEM is a registered trademark.
Toggle Worksafe Mode: Off | On
Terms | Privacy | Careers