Model
Nicole Packs
Posts: 257
New York, New York, US
#1, #2, #3 or none?
open for opinions, tips, and suggestions, thank you!
I'm not crazy for the last two in all honesty but its all the photag gave me to work with out of all the other shots
lol but I need a sitting pose!
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d75/S … LLERRR.jpg
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d75/S … e12_lo.jpg
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d75/S … e13_lo.jpg
Dec 09 12 10:08 am
Link Quote
Model
Nicole Packs
Posts: 257
New York, New York, US
And a happy thank you in advance shot of me at the mall for those who are taking their time out to reply
thank youuuuu!
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d75/S … /__429.jpg
Dec 09 12 10:08 am
Link Quote
Photographer
Art Of Imaging
Posts: 13,083
Brooklyn, New York, US
i like #2 the best
Dec 09 12 10:09 am
Link Quote
Photographer
Lee_Photography
Posts: 7,717
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US
Photo 1
You have all the space behind you but have lost your foot
Photo 2
Interesting
But would love to see your beautiful eyes
[Arch that back, lower shoulder toward camera for long looking neck]
Photo 3
Not so much, pose not flattering
Photo 4
Think long fingers
Hair band on wrist
Those eyes need to be in focus
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
Dec 09 12 12:17 pm
Link Quote
Model
EMILY C
Posts: 939
Portland, Maine, US
Argh, I'm afraid it's one of those cases where it's "none of them".
I love #1 - but it's a shame the photographer cut off your foot in the shot.
Dec 09 12 12:29 pm
Link Quote
Model
000---000
Posts: 706
Alberta, Alabama, US
model emily wrote: Argh, I'm afraid it's one of those cases where it's "none of them".
I love #1 - but it's a shame the photographer cut off your foot in the shot.
Agreed!
Dec 09 12 12:39 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 28,615
Lodi, California, US
#1: Terrible composition (the photographer's fault, not yours). Your body is dead-center (lots of dead space to your back) and your foot is chopped off. That's a bummer; this could have been a great shot.
#2: Nice use of light, but you're kinda gray. And I wish you weren't wearing those sunglasses.
#3: See above. Interesting pose.
#4: Terrible snapshot. Badly lighted, out of focus, noisy, badly composed.
None of them are up to your port's current standards.
Dec 09 12 04:11 pm
Link Quote
Model
E e v a
Posts: 1,707
Nashville, Tennessee, US
Damn number one was gorgeous. Sucks they cropped it out
Maybe if its cropped in a little tighter it can be salvageable.
Dec 09 12 04:19 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Art Silva Photography
Posts: 6,767
Santa Barbara, California, US
I like the first one but it looks like the photographer sneezed when he hit the shutter, it's badly framed...
You look amazing in the shot tho but to bad the photographer screwed it up!
Dec 09 12 04:37 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
London Fog
Posts: 5,003
London, England, United Kingdom
#1 is the best pose, but the foot being cut-off is a no no.
2 and 3 show off your legs really well too.
Dec 09 12 04:40 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
jkcphotography
Posts: 45
Saint Louis, Missouri, US
agree with others about #1 like #2 as well.
Dec 09 12 04:48 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
SKITA Studios
Posts: 1,343
Boston, Massachusetts, US
keep one even w/ the cut off foot...fashion shots in magazines seem to ignore rules of cropping...cutting off limbs at joints, weird crops, etc.
It's the best of the 3 you posted...wish the foot weren't cropped as well..
Dec 10 12 08:03 am
Link Quote
Model
Nicole Packs
Posts: 257
New York, New York, US
THanks for much guys!!!
I'm using #1 in that case. I'm taking a chance!
Thank you<3
Dec 14 12 01:02 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
L Raye
Posts: 4,791
Petaluma, California, US
Keep #1, maybe crop it into a square, and maybe cut off your foot even more.
The others don't show you off enough, so don't keep them.
Dec 14 12 01:12 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Drew Smith Photography
Posts: 3,220
Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
First one is best but he cut your foot off.
Dec 14 12 01:15 pm
Link Quote
Model
Colorado Model Amber
Posts: 5,510
Castle Rock, Colorado, US
#1 Your left Foot is half chopped off, So no on that
#2 and #3 are good but #2 is the best
Dec 14 12 02:39 pm
Link Quote
Model
Nikki Magnusson
Posts: 6,770
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
model emily wrote: Argh, I'm afraid it's one of those cases where it's "none of them".
I love #1 - but it's a shame the photographer cut off your foot in the shot.
yup...
that cuttin' off the foot thing has made me trash a few of my fav photos..
and also prevented me from shootin' with that same shooter again..
Dec 14 12 02:51 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Yan Tan Tethera
Posts: 4,011
Biggleswade, England, United Kingdom
Nikki Magnusson wrote: yup...
that cuttin' off the foot thing has made me trash a few of my fav photos..
and also prevented me from shootin' with that same shooter again..
Agreed
Dec 14 12 03:00 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
JCB522
Posts: 37
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
I agree with everyone else. Number 1 is great but the foot was cut off, I'm sure it can be salvaged with a cool crop though. I also like number 2 but I think it feels like you're not well lit or too dark, kind of like it lost detail in your dress
Dec 14 12 04:39 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Peach Jones
Posts: 4,942
Champaign, Illinois, US
model emily wrote: Argh, I'm afraid it's one of those cases where it's "none of them".
I love #1 - but it's a shame the photographer cut off your foot in the shot.
+2
Dec 14 12 07:08 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
imcFOTO
Posts: 308
Bothell, Washington, US
Samantha Emme wrote: Damn number one was gorgeous. Sucks they cropped it out
Maybe if its cropped in a little tighter it can be salvageable.
My thoughts too - crop it close to the back and the feet won't be such an issue.
I actually like #1 of the 3 - it looks more 'professional' to be honest and the pose shows a lot more confidence.
Of the others, #3 is better. Really #2 looks more like a shot from a friend's cellphone - not so good.
Dec 14 12 11:35 pm
Link Quote