Forums > General Industry > Deleteing old accts.

Photographer

Images of Light

Posts: 258

Lake Charles, Louisiana, US

So why does MM not delete say 3 year old accts?  If they have not had any activity. It would free up lots of space and there system would run faster as well.

Dec 10 12 10:04 pm Link

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

Because Model Mayhem has more tools than Home Depot.

Dec 10 12 11:03 pm Link

Photographer

Paolo D Photography

Posts: 11502

San Francisco, California, US

you may get a better response if you asked in the "site related" forum.

Dec 10 12 11:15 pm Link

Photographer

Rays Fine Art

Posts: 7504

New York, New York, US

One part is people that are happy with the pictures they have up and see no point in changing anything.

Another is people taking a hiatus but intend to get active again once more urgent personal business is taken care of

Another is the fact that having more accounts is one of the things that makes the site viable to advertisers, and therefore keeps the site available to us.  (I recently got a notice from another site that I was at risk of being dropped for inactivity.  That site has something like 15,000 total members, with less than 300 llamas in the New York area.  It's actually pretty worthless to me or to advertisers.)

Just in case you're not aware of it, when you are browsing for llamas or anyone else, you can sort the results by last activity, recently updated, or longest on MM, all of which would be ways limiting the results and making them more useful to you, as would restricting the results to those portfolios that have had activity within a specific time period such as 30 days.

Dec 11 12 08:59 am Link

Photographer

Looknsee Photography

Posts: 26342

Portland, Oregon, US

Maybe MM should hire people to take care of that.  And in order to pay them, maybe MM should start charging for membership.  Let's say, $75 a year.

Dec 11 12 02:34 pm Link

Model

JessieLeigh

Posts: 2109

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

It's highly unlikely that these inactive accounts are taking up space that is needed for other purposes. It's the active users that are using up the most of a website's resources.

Dec 11 12 03:14 pm Link

Photographer

Boho Hobo

Posts: 25351

Santa Barbara, California, US

Images of Light wrote:
So why does MM not delete say 3 year old accts?  If they have not had any activity. It would free up lots of space and there system would run faster as well.

makes MM seem more active to have 800k  (active and dead accounts) than 150k (just active) accounts.

Dec 12 12 12:18 am Link

Photographer

Andrew Thomas Evans

Posts: 24079

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

I've never really got upset because I was viewing a account that hasn't been logged into for a while. In fact, I'm not sure how that could even bother anyone.

hmm


Not to mention I had a old myspace friend from years and years ago on here who tagged me here years and years ago, and I was able to find them on facebook. She hasn't been active here for a few years and if she was purged I never would have connected with her again.



Andrew Thomas Evans
www.andrewthomasevans.com

Dec 12 12 10:47 am Link

Photographer

rfordphotos

Posts: 8866

Antioch, California, US

Images of Light wrote:
So why does MM not delete say 3 year old accts?  If they have not had any activity. It would free up lots of space and there system would run faster as well.

I imagine it is all a numbers game. They sell "potential" ad clicks to their customers --- telling them they have 3/4 of a million registered users sounds better than the 345,000 that have been active in the last YEAR.

Dec 12 12 03:27 pm Link

Photographer

J Welborn

Posts: 2552

Clarksville, Tennessee, US

It's all about the ad space they sell ---best to have large numbers even if they are not active . It's about the business end and not about the models and photographers  .

Dec 12 12 03:36 pm Link

Photographer

AJ_In_Atlanta

Posts: 13053

Atlanta, Georgia, US

I am sure they promote the total number of accounts when selling ad space, dead accounts or not they are trying to get more money.  Any sensible advertiser is going to pay based on daily traffic, unique visits, and conversions but I doubt IB cares how smart the advertiser is...

We are at the bottom of the list when it comes to what they care about

Dec 12 12 03:43 pm Link