Forums >
General Industry >
Who counts as a chaperone for under 18s?
I have a friend who is an under 18 model, a photographer I know wants to work with him but says he must have a chaperone with him who can sign a release form for him. What are the specifics regarding this? Does it have to be a parent/guardian or other family member or does any adult over 18 count? Dec 12 12 03:30 pm Link A parent or legal guardian must sign for the minor. Can't be just any person over 18. Dec 12 12 03:31 pm Link Parent or legal guardian only. Please note that in some states it is legal for someone under 18 to be married. The spouse (if over 18) in those states usually qualifies as a legal guardian. Regardless, all the usual child laws still apply - no nekkid or lewd photos regardless of who signs anything. Dec 12 12 03:35 pm Link NOTICE that the OP is in the UK. It would be best for people from the UK to answer the question as laws in the US are different. Just saying... Dec 12 12 03:37 pm Link UltimateAppeal wrote: Even more odd that they want a release, not generally something I see from U.K. photographers... Dec 12 12 03:39 pm Link AJScalzitti wrote: The photographer I know tends to do it to cover his own back, and he uses the images for projects towards his Master's degree so maybe it's a requirement, not too sure. Dec 12 12 03:43 pm Link Yoshimi Robot Battle wrote: Don't think "chaperone". I can be a "chaperone" for someone under 18. But that doesn't mean the courts would recognize me as having the authority to sign off on them having an abortion, acquiring birth control, having some kind of surgery or medical procedure. Dec 12 12 04:06 pm Link Yoshimi Robot Battle wrote: In reality, a photog using a release in the UK kinda uncovers their back, to the best of my understanding. Dec 12 12 04:08 pm Link Yoshimi Robot Battle wrote: Parental consent is required for under 18's in the UK. Minors cannot sign a valid release! Dec 12 12 04:10 pm Link London Fog wrote: Thanks that's all I needed to know Dec 12 12 04:15 pm Link Yoshimi Robot Battle wrote: Model releases are not required in the UK. Dec 12 12 04:20 pm Link Small Fruit Pits wrote: Yoshimi Robot Battle wrote: In reality, a photog using a release in the UK kinda uncovers their back, to the best of my understanding. Of course it depends on the terms and conditions built into that "release" but in general you [SFP] are correct. It can limit the use of the images rather than the other way around, and, if it does frame some limitation in it's wording, it can do so in minor or major ways. As an aside: My wife and myself are actually in such an agency arrangement with a single mother neighbour. She has a young son and also an abusive ex BF to whom she was never married who does not have, and has never acquired, parental responsibility, though he is the biological father. She has appointed, in writing, my wife and I to collect her young son from school should she become unavailable through illness or accident. The father actually showed up at the school once wanting the boy, the school [rightly, properly, and correctly] refused outright to release the boy to his father. Dec 12 12 04:37 pm Link |