login info join!
Forums > Photography Talk > 135L 2.0 or 200mm 2.8L Search   Reply
first123
Photographer
Bryan Benoit
Posts: 1,979
Miami, Florida, US


OP... The lens you got will make you very very happy.

I am sure that there are people out there with lenses they think are better.. but as you are not them and don't have that lens.. who gives a crap.
Feb 05 13 01:51 pm  Link  Quote 
Photographer
Frozen Instant Imagery
Posts: 3,369
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia


Frozen Instant Imagery wrote:
My inner pedant forces me to point out:

There are two 200mm L lenses in Canon's current line-up. The 200mm f/2.8L and the 200mm f/2L IS. They are really different, but both qualify as a "200L". Easy to tell them apart - one is black and light and one is heavy and white big_smile
optimistic negatives wrote:
Sure, but we were talking about the 200 2.8L, so I didn't figure specifying would be necessary.

There's also a 200 1.8L!

I said "in Canon's current line-up". The 200 1.8L was discontinued quite a long time ago (wow - 10 years ago according to LensPlay!).

---

I think the OP will enjoy the 135L. It's an excellent lens. It was the first L prime I bought, and one I usually include in my bag when selecting a subset.

Feb 06 13 02:36 am  Link  Quote 
first123   Search   Reply



main | browse | casting/travel | forums | shout box | help | advertising | contests | share | join the mayhem

more modelmayhem on: | | | edu

©2006-2013 ModelMayhem.com. All Rights Reserved.
MODEL MAYHEM is a registered trademark.
Toggle Worksafe Mode: Off | On
Terms | Privacy | Internet Rank | Careers