Photographer
WmBirch
Posts: 225
Akron, Ohio, US
http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/17014625
Another photographer and I have been discussing if this is nude, implied, or what.
Jan 31 13 01:50 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
GPS Studio Services
Posts: 30,130
San Francisco, California, US
It depends on who u ask
Jan 31 13 01:51 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
WmBirch
Posts: 225
Akron, Ohio, US
GPS Studio Services wrote: It depends on who u ask
asking YOU, and anyone who sees this.
Jan 31 13 01:52 pm
Link Quote
Model
MoRina
Posts: 5,170
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, US
It's a nude with bodypaint.
Jan 31 13 01:53 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Viator-Defessus Photos
Posts: 456
College Station, Texas, US
What he's saying here is that there's not necessarily 1 "right" answer to this question. It's going to vary from person to person. Usually in these cases the only answer that matters is the one you choose for yourself.
That said, I would tend to consider it implied.
Jan 31 13 01:54 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Suicide and Redemption
Posts: 101
Atlanta, Georgia, US
I'd consider it body painting/Implied
Jan 31 13 01:56 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
John Horwitz
Posts: 2,548
Raleigh, North Carolina, US
the model does not shoot nudes - says so on her profile
Jan 31 13 01:57 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
hs photography
Posts: 445
Houston, Texas, US
I would say nude but somewhat obscured.
Jan 31 13 01:57 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
DAN CRUIKSHANK
Posts: 1,646
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Ask a Mod
Apparently this is NSFW:
http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/30591006
But this is OK:
http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31196900
Your shot might be considered nude because of the visible outline of nipple...
Jan 31 13 02:00 pm
Link Quote
Model
M U S E
Posts: 200
Richmond, Virginia, US
MoRina wrote: It's a nude with bodypaint.
Agreed.
If this is an "implied" shot then that makes all bodypaint implied nudity. Not in my opinion....if you are bodypainted you are still nude.
Jan 31 13 02:10 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
DVSmith
Posts: 409
Durham, North Carolina, US
MoRina wrote: It's a nude with bodypaint.
+1
Jan 31 13 02:16 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
WmBirch
Posts: 225
Akron, Ohio, US
Thank you all.
Jan 31 13 02:17 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Abbitt Photography
Posts: 10,558
Oakland Acres, Iowa, US
MoRina wrote: It's a nude with bodypaint.
That's how I'd describe it also.
Jan 31 13 02:17 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
PTPhotoUT
Posts: 1,727
Salt Lake City, Utah, US
She is partially covered with opaque body paint. So not nude.
Jan 31 13 02:18 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
James Morgan aka Maddog
Posts: 99
Burlison, Tennessee, US
This is one of those syntax grey area. Technically, if the genitalia or nipples can be clearly seen.. It's nude. Any non-clothing that prevents them from being seen: towel, ribbon, body posture, prop, or appendage.. Technically that's implied if the model is not dressed to society's current standards. Body paint is a hard area to address.. I've seen body paint done so well that the model can walk out in public because people aren't paying to close attention.. But all it takes is one person to notice and it can be a police issue.
If this was in my portfolio I'd mark it as adult - 18 over only just to be on the safe side of any possible legal issue.
Jan 31 13 02:25 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
-The Dave-
Posts: 8,063
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
By MM rules your first image is NSFW and can not be displayed as an Avatar or on your Bio page.
http://www.modelmayhem.com/help/rules/images
Jan 31 13 02:31 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Brian Scanlon
Posts: 709
Encino, California, US
It's like we need to define nude as if you can tell what is there, it's nude or we need another category to cover this case (be it body paint or wet t-shirt or whatever)
Jan 31 13 02:32 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
cy be rea n
Posts: 2,715
Vatican City, Holy See, Vatican City
"Nudity or nakedness is the state of wearing no clothing."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudity
Jan 31 13 02:34 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
S W I N S K E Y
Posts: 24,199
Saint Petersburg, Florida, US
of course it's nude..make up does not equal clothes..
Jan 31 13 02:35 pm
Link Quote
Model
M U S E
Posts: 200
Richmond, Virginia, US
S W I N S K E Y wrote: of course it's nude..make up does not equal clothes..
+1
Jan 31 13 02:42 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Daeda1us
Posts: 877
Little Rock, Arkansas, US
I generally consider body paint "nude".
Jan 31 13 02:45 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Dennis was here
Posts: 343
Kansas City, Missouri, US
I would say it is six of one and half a dozen of the other ... LOL
Jan 31 13 02:46 pm
Link Quote
Artist/Painter
Decay of Memory
Posts: 391
Asheville, North Carolina, US
Most noticeably, it's gold.
Jan 31 13 03:51 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
ontherocks
Posts: 19,979
Salem, Oregon, US
it seems like models who don't do nudes will do bodypaint. so for them it isn't nude. to me if i can see nipples it's nude.
as far as mayhem i don't know if you have to mark them 18+ or not. i would be inclined to mark it as NSFW myself.
Jan 31 13 03:53 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
EdwardKristopher
Posts: 2,370
Tempe, Arizona, US
I would consider it Body Painted, yet Implied is the closest I would believe it to be.
Jan 31 13 03:56 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
mphunt
Posts: 815
Missouri City, Texas, US
Model doesn't shoot nudes, so I guess not.
Jan 31 13 04:00 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Good Egg Productions
Posts: 12,816
Orlando, Florida, US
Why does it matter?
If you want to know if a model will do a particular idea, ask the model if she'll do it. The only person's opinion that matters is the model.
Jan 31 13 04:11 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Terrell Gates
Posts: 937
Santa Fe, New Mexico, US
Pretty much.... (o:}
Jan 31 13 04:12 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Mark Salo
Posts: 6,648
Olney, Maryland, US
I'm reminded of medieval scholars debating how many teeth a horse has.
Nude or not, it doesn't matter. Does the OP move in social circles that will judge him for photographing this image? Does he care? It will do him no good to argue semantics with his peers.
Jan 31 13 04:29 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Sal W Hanna
Posts: 6,445
Huntington Beach, California, US
Butt crack/No Butt crack. Hence why one is ok and the other is not.
It's bodypaint, it would be implied if more skin was showing in private areas.
Jan 31 13 04:35 pm
Link Quote
Model
NicoleNudes
Posts: 2,888
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Yes, she just has gold stuff on her
Jan 31 13 04:36 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Davos Photography
Posts: 3
Randolph, Ohio, US
In my opinion this is Implied, since any 'inappropriate' parts are not readily seen, however I would still mark it as 'NSFW'/'Mature' because there are some audiences that would claim it to be to revealing.
Jan 31 13 05:03 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
-Ira
Posts: 2,075
New York, New York, US
Its nude. Yet non revealing.
Jan 31 13 07:01 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
GPS Studio Services
Posts: 30,130
San Francisco, California, US
GPS Studio Services wrote: It depends on who u ask
WmBirch wrote: asking YOU, and anyone who sees this.
You will notice that there is no agreement here. The answers vary all across the board. That was the reason for my reply.
Feb 01 13 04:21 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Raoul Isidro Images
Posts: 4,270
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Yes she would be nude: before, during and after the shoot, and after the shower.
Even if she was facing the other way, she would still be nude, no?
.
Feb 01 13 06:50 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
wagnerLA
Posts: 47
Los Angeles, California, US
I would classify as "covered" nude.
Feb 01 13 06:58 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
Art of the nude
Posts: 11,136
Olivet, Michigan, US
John Horwitz wrote: the model does not shoot nudes - says so on her profile
Well, that settles it.
Of course, by that logic, THIS isn't a nude either (18+)
http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/18773353
Feb 01 13 07:36 pm
Link Quote
Model
Nikki Magnusson
Posts: 6,756
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
implied...
theres no uncovered goodies..
and thats that...
Feb 01 13 07:45 pm
Link Quote
Photographer
MIDNIGHT EXPRESS
Posts: 445
Pomona, California, US
Feb 01 13 07:52 pm
Link Quote
Makeup Artist
Cynna Stylz MUA
Posts: 171
New York, New York, US
Although covered, there is still too much nippy at view. This would make my 12yo nephew sooooo happy. Otherwise it is a beautiful pic.
Feb 01 13 08:02 pm
Link Quote