My initial reaction was to like #2 better. But then I went back and looked at them again and I actually like #1 better. #2 has the benefit of the tighter crop and the model not having to compete with the background, so that makes her stand out more. If this was a different type of picture other than the nude shot, then I'd go with #2. Being that it is a nude, I like #1 better as it shows the entire body, the positioning of the legs, and the curves of the model better. I also like the framing effect of the trees, and the elements on the ground; the leaves, texture, etc. Some may argue that these other elements distract from the focus, but I feel that they add to the atmosphere of the shot and it gives me a context in which to put the featured model. To me it helps create a story around it. In #2, without the enviromental elements, it's just a shot of a nude model. At least that's my opinion and why I like #1 better.
DRaskin Photography wrote: My initial reaction was to like #2 better. But then I went back and looked at them again and I actually like #1 better. #2 has the benefit of the tighter crop and the model not having to compete with the background, so that makes her stand out more. If this was a different type of picture other than the nude shot, then I'd go with #2. Being that it is a nude, I like #1 better as it shows the entire body, the positioning of the legs, and the curves of the model better. I also like the framing effect of the trees, and the elements on the ground; the leaves, texture, etc. Some may argue that these other elements distract from the focus, but I feel that they add to the atmosphere of the shot and it gives me a context in which to put the featured model. To me it helps create a story around it. In #2, without the enviromental elements, it's just a shot of a nude model. At least that's my opinion and why I like #1 better.
#1 has a lower background (large dark square stones at leg level) that is quite distracting for you the model. I like the tighter crop of #2.
Two suggestions:
1) Better fill light on your face too would have set you apart from the background more.
2) What appears to be a panty line in both images. Looser fitting underwear/panties/pants before a nude shoot would be recommended. Panty (and bra) lines are an unfortunate, though not uncommon, distraction with new models/photogs doing nudes. I looked at the other nudes in your port and the same horizontal line (just above pubic area in these 2 pics) does not appear. Photoshop can take care of it though. Just a suggestion.
#1 has a lower background (large dark square stones at leg level) that is quite distracting for you the model. I like the tighter crop of #2.
Two suggestions:
1) Better fill light on your face too would have set you apart from the background more.
2) What appears to be a panty line in both images. Looser fitting underwear/panties/pants before a nude shoot would be recommended. Panty (and bra) lines are an unfortunate, though not uncommon, distraction with new models/photogs doing nudes. I looked at the other nudes in your port and the same horizontal line (just above pubic area in these 2 pics) does not appear. Photoshop can take care of it though. Just a suggestion.
Don't like either of them for a port. The shadow going across the body is distracting and the bulk feature to me in a shot like this would be the body. I think its an ok shot, but not something I would put in my port.
Kyle T Edwards
Posts: 291
St Catharines, Ontario, Canada
While I like that #2 shows your expression better, #1 shows your entire body (including the curves of your legs) and, as was previously mentioned, has you nicely framed by the trees, so my vote goes to #1.
I prefer #1--nude in the location works well. Scars & lines are appropriate--this isn't intended to be a high fashion glam shot. Very dark areas or minor differences in light & shading are not at all distracting to me, unlike some who have offered different opinions. I like your hand & arm position--to me demonstrate some fluidity & naturalness, not stiffness. Your expression is better in #1 & it does show your whole body, although #2 does show your torso better.
That said, you need to weigh these shots against the other two in your port where you are framed by a tree. Of the 4, only one really needs to be in your port. Also, do you want an image of you as "nude-in-nature," or do you want something that is more art nude in character. If the latter, #2 with an even tighter crop might be better.
| 
| 
| edu