No, it's not me or my work, lol. But I was wondering what you guys honestly think of this cover. I think it looks overdone and unnatural especially that is a celebrity.
JimBobLc
Posts: 192
Martinsburg, West Virginia, US
Seems to be a Chinese publication. Maybe they are meeting Chinese customer expectations on a Chinese budget?
It does look very unnatural though (darkening behind the hair etc) but again are Chinese presses able to print out a high quality image? The final in print might be very poor anyway due to limitations on their color printing capabilities. Who knows this look might work better given other factors such as paper, ink, etc.
Maybe this is how she really looks and all other photos of her are photoshopped Actually she kind of looks like that "catwoman" or what was her name...
hahaha, I don't blame the retouchers they are doing what they are told it's more than likely the creative director(s) or higher ups wanting more of this more of that. I just went through the same thing with new staff at a publication I hope I don't end up on photoshop disasters though, lol.
R G wrote: I think it looks overdone and unnatural especially that is a celebrity.
+1
R G wrote: hahaha, I don't blame the retouchers they are doing what they are told it's more than likely the creative director(s) or higher ups wanting more of this more of that.
Christiana1990 wrote: Maybe this is how she really looks and all other photos of her are photoshopped Actually she kind of looks like that "catwoman" or what was her name...
Frankly the years have not been kind to her, and I didn't think she was pretty to start with. Maybe we should blame whoever decided to hire her for a cover in the first place, I mean the retouchers can only work with what they are given.
AJScalzitti wrote: Frankly the years have not been kind to her, and I didn't think she was pretty to start with. Maybe we should blame whoever decided to hire her for a cover in the first place, I mean the retouchers can only work with what they are given.
Q: What does Matthew Broderick say when he's having sex with his wife?
A: "I'm on a horse!"
Everyone is at a different place... for a different reason...that can be very different from where WE are at right now. Life is a journey... with a full spectrum of people with different competency levels...all trying the best they can to get through. There are always people behind us... with work that is inferior to ours...and people way ahead of us... that we wish we could look like.
Who knows...it could also be that the magazine art director is a jerk...or the production/retouch team is an incompetent, annoying relative of the boss.
Bad images happen...good ones take a lot, a lot of work and art...and time... and skill... and experience... that We gain along the way. AND...Im not as pretty as I used to be either...and its heading in the wrong direction for me too.
doubtful but who knows, maybe it's deliberate to get it noticed again and people to buy it,, bad publicity is still good publicity? Lool
I think the most frustrating about it is the lens blur halo around it
J M
Posts: 357
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
JimBobLc wrote: Seems to be a Chinese publication. Maybe they are meeting Chinese customer expectations on a Chinese budget?
It does look very unnatural though (darkening behind the hair etc) but again are Chinese presses able to print out a high quality image? The final in print might be very poor anyway due to limitations on their color printing capabilities. Who knows this look might work better given other factors such as paper, ink, etc.
Wow, that's awfully ignorant of you.
China have pretty high budgets at least enough to get this sort of work done. And why would their presses be any worse? China's one of the most successful economy's at the moment and the fashion industry there is booming because of it.
Ps I don't get SJP hate, I thought she was kinda cute in the tv show. She hasn't aged well I guess but at least hasn't gone plastic, at least not that I'm aware of?
I really would love to see the original image because it could be a botex issue as well as the retoucher removing key facial lines....I did like the fact that they didn't mess he hands up this time......
The image and photoshop work isnt that bad, the problem is that they put a women in her late 40's on the cover of a magazine and try and make her look 22. Magazine covers are always overdone, but when you get to a certain age, it actually looks like youve been over done because they try and hide your age.