Envy wrote:
*cough*
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/1577222

Okay - that was funny.
Well played

Really, though I think it boils down to:
No 1 size fits all answers.

Whether or not tattoos are "okay" depends entirely on
the requirements of the shoot and the preference of
the photographer - or the client who is ultimately
paying for the shoot.

If I'm shooting for me, meh - I like tattoos
(just not on me)

If I'm creating content for publication,
it varies wildly.

Kenn Freeman wrote:
Now don't get me wrong.  I like tattoos for the most part.  Some of them can be rather large and intrusive for a shoot but they are art.  But I'm just curious.  Is it now a requirement that ALL glamour models have tattoos?  It sure seems that way.

great question Kenn! I hear its a necessary thing in order to get shoots. You MUST have a full sleeve or NO PAID work. You also must have nipple and down "there : piercings to even be CONSIDERED for work at $75 per hour or over. Pshhhhhh good thing someone cleared that up. Great question. Us glamour models have to have standards you know! Save the no tattoos or piercings for the art nudes.