Photographer
Jorge Kreimer
Posts: 3716
San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico
Model
Beth Chambers
Posts: 465
London, England, United Kingdom
Another one I'm not so keen on, maybe the colours and style are a bit too bizarre for me
Photographer
Rik Williams
Posts: 4005
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Photographer
Camerosity
Posts: 5805
Saint Louis, Missouri, US
Rik Williams wrote:
Not sure "worst" is the best word, since worst implies bad, but this is my least favorite.
Model
Shirin Brigitte
Posts: 379
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
You made it pretty hard for me!!!
Photographer
EdwardKristopher
Posts: 3409
Tempe, Arizona, US
Shirin, It was impossible to pick a "Worst" as None of your pictures are "Worst" by any sort of the imagination! I did pick this one as I love the look and I want to go against the grain here! Your Avatar, by the way, is Spot On gorgeous! All the Best, Edward
Photographer
Rik Williams
Posts: 4005
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Not a big fan of this one
Photographer
Laura Elizabeth Photo
Posts: 2253
Rochester, New York, US
This, you've got enough pictures where photographers can see your look, you don't need a bad selfie in there.
Model
Shirin Brigitte
Posts: 379
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Ariadne Photography wrote: This, you've got enough pictures where photographers can see your look, you don't need a bad selfie in there. Thats my "recent look" picture. Its for photographers to know how I look right now.
Photographer
Laura Elizabeth Photo
Posts: 2253
Rochester, New York, US
Shirin McBennett-Sheen wrote: Thats my "recent look" picture. Its for photographers to know how I look right now. Oh no I get that, but maybe put it on your front page and not in your port, I'm just super against any cell pics in ports lol sorry. But here I'll pick another one, not really awful just not my fav
Photographer
EdwardKristopher
Posts: 3409
Tempe, Arizona, US
Nothing wrong with this...Just not on the level of your others.
Model
Kirst
Posts: 550
Derry, New Hampshire, US
dd photography wrote: this just isn't as exciting or enticing as your other photos
Model
Wendy Fay
Posts: 23
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, US
You have such an awesome range of looks! They're all great but I have to pick one, and I love jack in the box so...
Model
Alabaster Crowley
Posts: 8283
Tucson, Arizona, US
You can hardly see your face and the concept is silly. Also, the tip of your right hand is cut off, ruining the composition.
Photographer
madheiress
Posts: 272
Saxapahaw, North Carolina, US
Apologies for not posting the photo in the forum. (I consulted the how-to thread to learn how but all the instruction screenshots are missing) https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/28503885 You have some great work in your port, so this falls short. The shooter in the back hjas an odd expression (and is basically photobombing you). Everything about the image looks amateurish compared to the other great images in your port.
Model
Beth Chambers
Posts: 465
London, England, United Kingdom
I don't really like this one, I don't think all those shadows work and it's too grainy looking for my liking. You do have some really cool shots in your portfolio though
Photographer
Jorge Kreimer
Posts: 3716
San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico
Unflattering.
Model
Christie_R
Posts: 635
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Jorge Kreimer wrote:
The post is awkward, doesn't show your skill or the models. Not sure what you're trying to convey.
Photographer
Camerosity
Posts: 5805
Saint Louis, Missouri, US
You've got kind of a deer-in-the-headlights expression. And you're looking upward, which leaves a lot of white at the bottoms of your eyes (known as canoe eye, because the whites form the shapes of canoes).
Photographer
dd photography
Posts: 944
San Diego, California, US
retouching drives me crazy, the red stripe on her face is a huge STOP sign. The hat? You have MUCH better avatar choices!
Photographer
Kane
Posts: 1647
London, England, United Kingdom
I really dislike the models expression. The rest of your port is incredible
Photographer
Sarah Stiles
Posts: 64
Greenville, South Carolina, US
This was hard cause I really like your work. I would say this one just because the one next to it is way cooler and almost the same idea.
Model
Beth Chambers
Posts: 465
London, England, United Kingdom
Surprisingly your avatar is my least favourite of your portfolio. I think it is bland in comparison to your other lovely shots, and definitely doesn't do you justice having it as your main image
Photographer
Marc Damon
Posts: 6562
Biloxi, Mississippi, US
Neon Glow Light???
Model
Beth Chambers
Posts: 465
London, England, United Kingdom
It's UV light, what's wrong with that? I don't like this one of yours:
Photographer
dd photography
Posts: 944
San Diego, California, US
gotta agree! whoops!
Photographer
Jorge Kreimer
Posts: 3716
San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico
Photographer
Marc Damon
Posts: 6562
Biloxi, Mississippi, US
Retoucher
EvelinaMam
Posts: 176
Šilutė, Klaipėdos, Lithuania
Model
Rockabella
Posts: 588
Bargara, Queensland, Australia
Model
Tiffiney C
Posts: 570
Los Angeles, California, US
I would have kept a little contrast in the photo it looks a little flat (the after photo of course. Tiffiney www.tiffineyc.com
Model
Tiffiney C
Posts: 570
Los Angeles, California, US
Photographer
David Kirk
Posts: 4852
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
I would have to say this one. Why? Nothing really wrong with this, but all the rest are so damn good!
Model
Robby Rockett
Posts: 85
Palm Coast, Florida, US
Something about the pose/ The way that top is laying kind of makes her blockyor hides her figure in a not so strategic way.
Photographer
Marc Damon
Posts: 6562
Biloxi, Mississippi, US
Sorry Robby. I just don't get the plague mask.
Photographer
EdwardKristopher
Posts: 3409
Tempe, Arizona, US
Marc Damon wrote: Sorry Robby. I just don't get the plague mask.
|