Forums > Model Colloquy > How to handle "no show"

Photographer

255 West

Posts: 6468

New York, New York, US

terrysphotocountry wrote:
I have arranged a location and paid money

How thoroughly did you vet the model?
That's why I like phone calls and preliminary meetings.
(This weird thing of "I only text with the photographers before the shoot because ____ (fill in the blank)" is completely unprofessional, is likely a flake or a even be a  loser.)

With calls and meetings, you get a sense what the person is like. Are they professional, or are they a pothead high school dropout?


To answer your question, I offer this answer:

Dump 'em. NEXT!

Aug 02 13 07:52 pm Link

Photographer

Risen Phoenix Photo

Posts: 3779

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

255 West wrote:

How thoroughly did you vet the model?
That's why I like phone calls and preliminary meetings.
(This weird thing of "I only text with the photographers before the shoot because ____ (fill in the blank)" is completely unprofessional, is likely a flake or a even be a  loser.)

With calls and meetings, you get a sense what the person is like. Are they professional, or are they a pothead high school dropout?


To answer your question, I offer this answer:

Dump 'em. NEXT!

Agreed each model gets one pass if they are so unprofessional twice I will block them and trash them privately to every photographer I know

Aug 03 13 01:46 pm Link

Photographer

Looknsee Photography

Posts: 26342

Portland, Oregon, US

Desert Shadows Photo wrote:
Some models that I have contacted or who have contacted me for a shoot seem to e pretty fickle. The are all enthusiastic to model, keep e-mailing me about the shoot but when I have arranged a location and paid money t hold the location all of a sudden 2 days before the shoot I never hear from them again. This happens mostly with male models. Female models have very rarely stood me up. How do you handle a situation like this? Is there a way to warn other photographers about such models?? What gives??

Now that the model has not shown up, here are some things you can do:
...  You don't have to work with her again.
...  If someone asks, you can tell them your story about the model.
...  There always is something constructive you can do with your time; do that.

Conversely:
...  Don't start yet another flake thread; read all the already existing ones.
...  Don't tell strangers your story -- they have no reason to believe you.
...  Don't post a list of flake models -- it looks bad:
     ===  Why are all these models avoiding the guy with the list?
     ===  The profile makes a first impression; such a list makes a bad one.

If flakes bother you, be more selective about who you work with:
...  Make the effort to build a little local support group of photographers & models.
...  Ask your local photographers & models if they know your candidate model.
...  Ask your local folks if they have recommendations for you.
...  In my experience, traveling models (who are dependent on getting paid to
     get home) tend to be more reliable.
...  There are hints in the model's profile & portfolio; learn to recognize them.
...  Form relationships with good local models; some might be available to fill in
     for you at a moment's notice.

Aug 03 13 02:06 pm Link

Photographer

J O H N A L L A N

Posts: 12221

Los Angeles, California, US

H A Z E wrote:
If you are putting down money for a location, I would say book more than 1 llama. If one doesn't turn up at least you still have the other one to work with and if they both turn up you can shoot them together.

You know, that kind of thing only really works for the most frivolous hobbyist shoots.

Aug 03 13 02:15 pm Link

Photographer

Bare Essential Photos

Posts: 3605

Upland, California, US

To HAZE --

H A Z E wrote:
If you are putting down money for a location, I would say book more than 1 llama. If one doesn't turn up at least you still have the other one to work with and if they both turn up you can shoot them together.

Why don't you book more than one photographer and you can pay those that show up to shoot you. Then see if you feel you can recommend that method to others.

Aug 03 13 03:28 pm Link

Photographer

Darren Brade

Posts: 3351

London, England, United Kingdom

K I C K H A M wrote:
No reason to reach out and warn people-- you will just look petty.

I'm often a "pinch" model. I have photographers I work with on a very regular basis, and we have a great working relationship. When a girl flakes, they call me (or one of the other few others like me they each have) and usually can have A model.

Not perfect, but it works.

Also, sometimes usually casting calls on MM to find last-minute replacements works.

there really aren't enough "pinch" models about, so a big high-five to them. :-)

Aug 03 13 04:09 pm Link

Photographer

DebbieMajor Photography

Posts: 8

Lexington, Kentucky, US

"H A Z E wrote:
If you are putting down money for a location, I would say book more than 1 llama. If one doesn't turn up at least you still have the other one to work with and if they both turn up you can shoot them together."

J O H N  A L L A N wrote:
You know, that kind of thing only really works for the most frivolous hobbyist shoots.

I do this all the time and it works quite well for me. In four years of MM I have never not had a shoot due to lack of models, because I overbook the models. Some pretty creative shoots have resulted from this as well.

Aug 07 13 08:16 pm Link

Photographer

Loki Studio

Posts: 3523

Royal Oak, Michigan, US

This is a simple problem to fix- require a deposit to confirm any photoshoot.

Aug 08 13 09:16 am Link

Model

neeeep

Posts: 238

Los Angeles, California, US

Risen Phoenix Photo wrote:

Agreed each model gets one pass if they are so unprofessional twice I will block them and trash them privately to every photographer I know

bad juju.

Aug 08 13 06:54 pm Link

Photographer

zaxpix

Posts: 1988

New Brunswick, New Jersey, US

Desert Shadows Photo wrote:
...How do you handle a situation like this?...

https://www.thibaultguevel.com/bibodarkblog/wp-content/uploads/image/rcrumb2.png

Z.

Aug 13 13 12:12 pm Link

Photographer

V A S I L I S

Posts: 8

Los Angeles, California, US

is there a list that has models that are flakes?

Mar 23 14 05:22 pm Link

Model

MelissaAnn

Posts: 3971

Seattle, Washington, US

V A S I L I S wrote:
is there a list that has models that are flakes?

No, and even if there was, it wouldn't be wise to use it.  The type of people that "blacklist" others are often petty and immature.  Not only that, but somebody is not a "flake" because they cancel one shoot due to illness etc, yet many otherwise reliable models would end up on flake lists (ones that didn't actually "flake"), if there was such a thing. 

Best thing to do is move on.  Flakes happen to everybody here, including models.  It's just part of doing what we do.  It's either worth it to you, or it's not.  No amount of bitching, blacklisting, flake lists, etc will change the fact that flakes/cancellations will continue to happen.

Think of it like this.  People call in sick to work, right?  Modeling is a job, but people still flake/call in sick occasionally, just like they do at every other job.  If you're getting a huge amount of flakes, you need to change your vetting process and hire better/more reliable models.

Mar 23 14 05:33 pm Link

Photographer

Personality Imaging

Posts: 2100

Hoover, Alabama, US

We have a local group and communicate a lot at monthly dinners, shoots, etc.  If somebody flakes without a call, excuse etc  they are pretty much done in the extended metro region.

Mar 23 14 05:43 pm Link

Photographer

PhotographyByLeon

Posts: 65

Coral Gables, Florida, US

Move on...life is way too short...

Mar 23 14 05:48 pm Link

Photographer

AJ_In_Atlanta

Posts: 13053

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Don't you think the OP has figured out a solution since July of last year?

Mar 23 14 05:49 pm Link

Photographer

Tony Lawrence

Posts: 21526

Chicago, Illinois, US

MelissaAnn  wrote:

No, and even if there was, it wouldn't be wise to use it.  The type of people that "blacklist" others are often petty and immature.  Not only that, but somebody is not a "flake" because they cancel one shoot due to illness etc, yet many otherwise reliable models would end up on flake lists (ones that didn't actually "flake"), if there was such a thing. 

Best thing to do is move on.  Flakes happen to everybody here, including models.  It's just part of doing what we do.  It's either worth it to you, or it's not.  No amount of bitching, blacklisting, flake lists, etc will change the fact that flakes/cancellations will continue to happen.

Think of it like this.  People call in sick to work, right?  Modeling is a job, but people still flake/call in sick occasionally, just like they do at every other job.  If you're getting a huge amount of flakes, you need to change your vetting process and hire better/more reliable models.

I've been reading many of your posts for a while.   You make excellent points.   I have this debate with another member all the time.   When people aren't being paid and even when some are they may flake.   Its not personal.   Its not too be mean.   Its almost never because they dislike the persons work or reputation.   Being angry about things, situations and people you can't control is silly.   Most of us can't hire models so we rely on trade.   Some models may decide last minute that photos alone aren't worth a long drive or buying new outfits.   When I get flakes I reflect on past models who have shot in filthy sketchy places for free.

Many have driven hours too shoot.   Several have taken me to dinner and helped me with other projects.   A few have brought me outfits to keep and jewelry.   I've had models give me money for TF shoots.   Focus on success and not failure.   If some flake or cancel last minute, so be it.   A few days ago a MM showed on time after calling to confirm.   How many shooters praise that kind of model?   We start threads about disappointments.   Human nature is too complain I guess.

Mar 23 14 05:52 pm Link

Model

MelissaAnn

Posts: 3971

Seattle, Washington, US

Tony Lawrence wrote:

I've been reading many of your posts for a while.   You make excellent points.   I have this debate with another member all the time.   When people aren't being paid and even when some are they may flake.   Its not personal.   Its not too be mean.   Its almost never because they dislike the persons work or reputation.   Being angry about things, situations and people you can't control is silly.   Most of us can't hire models so we rely on trade.   Some models may decide last minute that photos alone aren't worth a long drive or buying new outfits.   When I get flakes I reflect on past models who have shot in filthy sketchy places for free.

Many have driven hours too shoot.   Several have taken me to dinner and helped me with other projects.   A few have brought me outfits to keep and jewelry.   I've had models give me money for TF shoots.   Focus on success and not failure.   If some flake or cancel last minute, so be it.   A few days ago a MM showed on time after calling to confirm.   How many shooters praise that kind of model?   We start threads about disappointments.   Human nature is too complain I guess.

You have the right attitude Tony.  smile

Mar 23 14 06:06 pm Link

Photographer

matt-h2

Posts: 876

Oakland, California, US

Loki Studio wrote:
This is a simple problem to fix- require a deposit to confirm any photoshoot.

Sure. And watch your booking rate go to zero.

Mar 23 14 06:12 pm Link

Photographer

Photozay Studios

Posts: 16

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Everyone talks like "paying the model" is the way to separate the hows from noshows.  I've got news for you, it doesn't matter.  Paid will flake too.  Make friends with other photographers and compare notes.  Together you'll separate the wheat from the chaff.

Mar 23 14 06:37 pm Link

Photographer

MH Photography

Posts: 16

Madison, Wisconsin, US

Desert Shadows Photo wrote:
Is there a way to warn other photographers about such models?? What gives??

I have been saying and will continue to say "...why doesn't MM have a rating system that all can provide reviews for both photographers and models.  This problem will continue until we are able to weed out the flake models and creepy photographers.

And paying models doesn't appear to help...I have had as many paid models flake as TF Models???

I am appreciative that MM has at least started blocking the poor quality selfies from getting a profile. 

Give us the chance to review...

Mar 26 14 12:55 pm Link

Model

D A N I

Posts: 4627

Little Rock, Arkansas, US

MH Photography  wrote:

I have been saying and will continue to say "...why doesn't MM have a rating system that all can provide reviews for both photographers and models.  This problem will continue until we are able to weed out the flake models and creepy photographers.

And paying models doesn't appear to help...I have had as many paid models flake as TF Models???

I am appreciative that MM has at least started blocking the poor quality selfies from getting a profile. 

Give us the chance to review...

Yeah. No

Mar 26 14 12:59 pm Link

Photographer

SPV Photo

Posts: 808

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

I wouldn't pay for a location unless it was someone I knew would show up, which is usually going to be someone I shot with.

There really isn't much you can do about no-shows. Suck it up and move on to the next one.

Mar 26 14 01:21 pm Link

Photographer

Dark Magus

Posts: 7027

El Cajon, California, US

I used to have all different kind of flakes, so many it drove me nuts particularly when I needed a model for a college project. Then I instituted 3 simple rules in picking models and since that time I have had 0 flakes that I could not predict.
Rule #1: About 10 to 14 percent of the models in a given area post that they will pose nude. When I look at the portfolios any model (this may sound crass but so be it) who does not show her nipples in HER portfolio I pass over. Reason: Some of these models say they will pose nude but on the day of the shoot either have all kinds of conditions or are obviously unhappy to be taking off their clothes. It shows in the images. A confident woman without hangups (or a boyfriend who has hangups) about being nude will show her nipples in her port, at least this is my experience.
Rule #2: Initial contact is a private message on MM and I try to keep everything on MM. It gives me a record of what was said, who said it and when.
Rule #3: I get a telephone number and call the model before the shoot. No number, no shoot, no exceptions. I have numbers for models that I have not called in years but if a model intends to flake they really don't want their phone blown up when they are not where they said they would be.
There, three simple rules that have worked for me so far. I have had 2 flakes since but I knew they were going to flake and had something else to do.
Another thing is I allow the model to set her rates. If I think they are excessive I am up front with her and sometimes we bargain and sometimes it works out and sometimes not. For me this system has worked.

Mar 27 14 05:58 am Link

Photographer

eybdoog

Posts: 2647

New York, New York, US

Amber Dawn  -  Colorado wrote:
There are MANY MANY post on this topic, Do a search and you'll get MANY MANY opinions.

Just move on find Models who are serious :-)

+1

Mar 27 14 06:05 am Link

Photographer

D-Light

Posts: 629

Newcastle, Limerick, Ireland

The standard advice is to pay the model and speak to photographers he/she has worked with in the past.

In my experience, neither works. While it will reduce the number of models who flake on you, it doesn't eliminate the problem. Some models, as with everyone else, can be great one time and a nightmare another.

Offering to pay her doesn't change the fact that she's lazy and unprofessional.

No shows are part of the job description when you work with free lance models. When you find a few that are reliable, try use them in preference to others. They may not always suit, so you'll have to go elsewhere but if you have a list of eight or nine that you can trust, it will cover a lot of your work.

The other alternative is to use agency models. If your client is willing to pay those rates that shouldn't be a problem but if you're financing the project yourself, it could be.

Mar 27 14 09:00 am Link

Photographer

Matt Schmidt Photo

Posts: 3709

Charlotte, North Carolina, US

A.  Pull out reference book of previous models worked with . . .
B.  Pick up the phone and dial . . .

Mar 27 14 09:10 am Link

Photographer

Abbitt Photography

Posts: 13562

Washington, Utah, US

1.  I don't invest anything I'm not happy to walk away from with freelance model shoots, unless I've previously worked with the model in question.

2.  I require a confirmation call, so if I hadn't heard from the model in 2 days, I wouldn't be waiting.  I'd be doing something else.

3.  If they do no show - have some pizza, beer and watch a good movie, and appreciate the unexpected free time.

Mar 27 14 09:14 am Link

Model

Kirst

Posts: 550

Derry, New Hampshire, US

I live pretty close to a big studio here, and I often get called to fill in for flakes, which i'm always happy to do if i'm free.
so it's always good to think about back up models. also check references before you shoot.
and I've seen a few people post flake lists on their profiles, but that just scares me away honestly. i think "what if something comes up, like a car wreck, but the photographer assumes i'm flaking? then i will be labeled publicly as a flake" and that's terrifying. i had one instance where I broke down half way to a shoot (fuel pump) and told the photographer. she just responded with "wow"
but aparently she freaked out, assumed I was flaking and posted it on facebook. while she was in the process of destroying my reputation, I was calling everyone i could to get a ride and ended up paying for a veryyyy expensive taxi ride. when I arrived at her studio she was very apologetic and took down the posts, but it showed me how some people can assume, over react or worse. and the things she posted were really hurtful and could've been damaging. one of my friends, who is an amazing model, was supposed to shoot with her the next week or so, but after seeing the posts she politely declined out of fear. so it's best to think: is it really worth posting?

Mar 27 14 09:21 am Link

Photographer

Herman Surkis

Posts: 10856

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

J O H N  A L L A N wrote:

You know, that kind of thing only really works for the most frivolous hobbyist shoots.

And sometimes not even then.

Did not work at the last planned shoot. Even with 2 shooters and 2 sets. Everybody turned up, and we had twice as many models as we needed. Got distracting trying to get something good from each.

Mar 27 14 10:06 am Link

Photographer

barepixels

Posts: 3195

San Diego, California, US

Matt Schmidt wrote:
A.  Pull out reference book of previous models worked with . . .
B.  Pick up the phone and dial . . .

C. Hunt them down and tickles them
D. Edit more pics from old shoots.

Mar 27 14 10:09 am Link

Photographer

Bare Essential Photos

Posts: 3605

Upland, California, US

Desert Shadows Photo wrote:
Some models that I have contacted or who have contacted me for a shoot seem to e pretty fickle. The are all enthusiastic to model, keep e-mailing me about the shoot but when I have arranged a location and paid money t hold the location all of a sudden 2 days before the shoot I never hear from them again. This happens mostly with male models. Female models have very rarely stood me up. How do you handle a situation like this? Is there a way to warn other photographers about such models?? What gives??

Best thing to do is to move on.

The sad thing is that those that do make a habit of flaking often times change their names and create new accounts later.

Mar 27 14 03:14 pm Link

Photographer

Risen Phoenix Photo

Posts: 3779

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

JessieLeigh wrote:
Are you paying the models? That's usually helpful, although it doesn't always weed out the flakes.

Are you talking to other photographers the models have worked with, to ensure that they have showed up for previous shoots as planned? If not, why not?

Your last point is a good point. The first point not so much. It shouldn't matter if the model is paid or not. A commitment is a commitment and a flake is a flake.

It's so easy to make an excuse, and most of them are pretty weak, or they blow you off completely.

My advice is to block the model, and tell everyone you know that they are not courteous or professional.

And yes the lack of Civility is unprofessional.  Or you can just stick a pin in your Vodoo Doll

Mar 27 14 03:50 pm Link

Model

Cervezax

Posts: 152

Atlanta, Georgia, US

MH Photography  wrote:

I have been saying and will continue to say "...why doesn't MM have a rating system that all can provide reviews for both photographers and models.  This problem will continue until we are able to weed out the flake models and creepy photographers.

And paying models doesn't appear to help...I have had as many paid models flake as TF Models???

I am appreciative that MM has at least started blocking the poor quality selfies from getting a profile. 

Give us the chance to review...

I really think if we had a system like that, it would be abused. How would you know if the model and photographer really shot?

Mar 28 14 01:15 pm Link

Photographer

Kennedy StillsandFilms

Posts: 146

Miami, Florida, US

That's why I schedule a 2nd model, better safe then sorry

Mar 28 14 01:24 pm Link

Photographer

Ramon Bryce

Posts: 122

Los Angeles, California, US

My strategy is to get good enough that they wouldn't even think of no-showing.  wink Time used on anything else is negative energy.

Mar 30 14 08:06 pm Link

Photographer

Hi_Spade Photography

Posts: 927

Florence, South Carolina, US

Ramon Bryce wrote:
My strategy is to get good enough that they wouldn't even think of no-showing.  wink Time used on anything else is negative energy.

Kinda hard to do unless you have a model or a maniquin wink.

Mar 30 14 08:28 pm Link