Forums >
Off-Topic Discussion >
Is the internet a sort of "Big Brother" apparatus
Even as I'm typing this...there is a masthead/topper advertising for photo stuff I've recently shopped for... And it's on my NY Times home page and my ymail page as well. Now...I'm not a paranoid sort by nature...I'm really a "Live and let live" and an "It is what it is" guy. But if "They" are tracking my shopping interests...what else? Do they know what I said to my Mom in that last email? Are they following what kind of porn I watch? (I only watch it for the articles BTW!) Ultimately...I suppose there isn't much we can do about it... But maybe Orwell's prediction is happening right in front of us:^(( Jul 20 14 05:56 pm Link Yes. Jul 20 14 05:59 pm Link I work for MS and I know what you did today you need to lay off the porn a bit. Jul 20 14 06:01 pm Link Orwell couldn't have imagined the level of surveillance that the internet makes possible. If there is money to be made from knowing what you wrote to your mother, you should assume that someone is tracking it. Jul 20 14 06:02 pm Link I assume as long as we aren't doing/planning anything illegal, "They" won't/can't really do anything to us...Right??? Still...I don't like to think about how "shared" my online life really might be! Jul 20 14 06:14 pm Link billy badfinger wrote: Yes, that's why the government wants to control it... Jul 20 14 06:17 pm Link billy badfinger wrote: You might be okay (safe) so long as you don't piss off anyone important, or you just might suffer from collateral damage when they decide to destroy someone else that pisses them off. Jul 20 14 06:27 pm Link Big Brother? The government doesn't care about you that much. The notion of surveillance is based on the assumption of perceived individual importance. To the government, you're just a 10-digit social attached to a given dollar amount in taxes. To corporations, you a potential sale out of millions of others with cash, too. They only care about people collectively. They're not spying on you, it's just a shrewd algorithm design to sway you to part with your cash. Outside of that, Big Brother doesn't really care... Jul 20 14 06:36 pm Link billy badfinger wrote: Jay Edwards wrote: And yet it's the private sector that seems to be doing it the most.. I assume as long as there's a profit motive attached, you're ok with it?? Jul 20 14 06:46 pm Link I'd like to believe that... In fact,I'm a very uninteresting guy...and quite bad for the economy. I only shop/buy when I have to...Def NOT a mall freak or impulse shopper. If I have a project I'm not equipped for...I'll buy stuff. If my Levis are just too tattered and torn...I'll buy some new ones. Still... Jul 20 14 06:51 pm Link To the OP...just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they are not after you. Jul 20 14 07:13 pm Link Kincaid Blackwood wrote: Yeah, Uh-huh. That's why NSA has agreements with most ISP's to capture your information. Have you been living under a rock to the past few years? The Internet is the ultimate government "big brother" machine. Jul 20 14 07:50 pm Link It's not like anyone that has access could scoop those nude photos or your credit card numbers. Right? Ars editor learns feds have his old IP addresses, full credit card numbers http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014 … d-numbers/ FOIA request turns up 9 years of records, including plaintext credit card numbers. NSA employees routinely pass around intercepted nude photos http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014 … de-photos/ "These are seen as the fringe benefits of surveillance positions," Jul 21 14 05:52 am Link Anyone who thinks they can be anonymous on the Internet is wrong. When I was working for a Fortune 50 company 15-20 years ago, there was a guy, using an e-mail address from that company, coming onto a newsgroup forum for our product & badmouthing it. His name wasn't in our directory, so I got concerned. I asked him to identify himself. He told me, "here's a quarter; call someone who cares". Found him -- he was a contractor for the company. I used his virtual quarter to call his great-grandboss. He wasn't a contractor any more. Jul 21 14 07:33 am Link Jay Edwards wrote: Tropical Photography wrote: Um, the private sector does not have the power to seize assets and imprison people. Jul 21 14 08:41 am Link The Internet started out as war technology/communications. Why wouldn't it be controlled by the government/Big Brother? Jul 21 14 08:47 am Link Jay Edwards wrote: Jay Edwards wrote: Um, the private sector does not have the power to seize assets and imprison people. Tell that to your bank. Jul 21 14 10:03 am Link Michael Bots wrote: Um, I am not forced to deal with a bank but I may choose to do so. Jul 21 14 10:04 am Link billy badfinger wrote: Jay Edwards wrote: What makes you think they don't control it already? Tropical Photography wrote: You might be right. Then again, you might be wrong. Jul 21 14 10:05 am Link Yes, but by choice, because it's the cool thing to do. Tell us that it's fun/a new feature to give up our privacy, and we do it willingly. Jul 21 14 06:02 pm Link Lohkee wrote: You misunderstand. Jul 21 14 09:02 pm Link Kincaid Blackwood wrote: Oh yea of little paranoia.... Jul 23 14 04:24 pm Link Kincaid Blackwood wrote: No, I don't think that I do misunderstand. What they capture, and what they are interested in pursuing, are two very different things. How do you think they find things of interest? Jul 23 14 04:46 pm Link Even if you block cookies --- White House Website Includes Unique Non-Cookie Tracker, Conflicts With Privacy Policy https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/07/w … acy-policy White House tracking website visitors with online ‘fingerprinting’ http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-b … rprinting/ "The White House is tracking visitors to its website, despite proudly promising that WhiteHouse.gov complies with federal privacy laws and does not use cookies. The AddThis tracker is present on every page on the site, according to EFF." "at least five percent of the internet’s top 100,000 websites are using canvas fingerprinting, a new kind tracking technology that is nearly impossible to block using conventional privacy tools." Jul 23 14 05:34 pm Link I think its a reflection of what the business world wants in general. Whether its a workers comp company wanting your entire medical history from birth, or a grocery store that wants your phone number, zip code, spending habits (obtained from that "rewards card" that you signed up for), people are asking for way too much personal information. Unfortunately, the average consumer doesn't have the good sense to say no. Jul 23 14 06:24 pm Link Jul 23 14 07:11 pm Link Well with a name like Billy Badfinger, what do you expect? Of course they'd be tracking you with a name like that Yeah but seriously, everyone is soooo paranoid these days. If the government can do it (spy on it's own citizens), it will, regardless of honesty, ethics, integrity, lies or blatant hypocrisy. There's no honour in places of government anymore, only a lust for knowledge and ultimate power. Jul 23 14 07:27 pm Link |