Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > Is the internet a sort of "Big Brother" apparatus

Photographer

billy badfinger

Posts: 887

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

Even as I'm typing this...there is a masthead/topper advertising for
photo stuff I've recently shopped for...
And it's on my NY Times home page and my ymail page as well.
Now...I'm not a paranoid sort by nature...I'm really a
"Live and let live" and an "It is what it is" guy.
But if "They" are tracking my shopping interests...what else?
Do they know what I said to my Mom in that last email?
Are they following what kind of porn I watch?
(I only watch it for the articles BTW!)
Ultimately...I suppose there isn't much we can do about it...
But maybe Orwell's prediction is happening right in front of us:^((

Jul 20 14 05:56 pm Link

Model

Alabaster Crowley

Posts: 8283

Tucson, Arizona, US

Yes.

Jul 20 14 05:59 pm Link

Photographer

Art Silva

Posts: 10064

Santa Barbara, California, US

I work for MS and I know what you did today  hmm  you need to lay off the porn a bit.

Jul 20 14 06:01 pm Link

Body Painter

Monad Studios

Posts: 10131

Santa Rosa, California, US

Orwell couldn't have imagined the level of surveillance that the internet makes possible.  If there is money to be made from knowing what you wrote to your mother, you should assume that someone is tracking it.

Jul 20 14 06:02 pm Link

Photographer

billy badfinger

Posts: 887

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

I assume as long as we aren't doing/planning anything illegal,
"They" won't/can't really do anything to us...Right???
Still...I don't like to think about how "shared" my online life really
might be!

Jul 20 14 06:14 pm Link

Photographer

Jay Edwards

Posts: 18616

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

billy badfinger wrote:
Is the internet a sort of "Big Brother" apparatus

Yes, that's why the government wants to control it...

Jul 20 14 06:17 pm Link

Photographer

HHPhoto

Posts: 1111

Denver, Colorado, US

billy badfinger wrote:
I assume as long as we aren't doing/planning anything illegal,
"They" won't/can't really do anything to us...Right???
Still...I don't like to think about how "shared" my online life really
might be!

You might be okay (safe) so long as you don't piss off anyone important, or you  just might suffer from collateral damage when they decide to destroy someone else that pisses them off.

Jul 20 14 06:27 pm Link

Photographer

Kincaid Blackwood

Posts: 23492

Los Angeles, California, US

Big Brother?

The government doesn't care about you that much. The notion of surveillance is based on the assumption of perceived individual importance. To the government, you're just a 10-digit social attached to a given dollar amount in taxes. To corporations, you a potential sale out of millions of others with cash, too. They only care about people collectively.

They're not spying on you, it's just a shrewd algorithm design to sway you to part with your cash. Outside of that, Big Brother doesn't really care...

Jul 20 14 06:36 pm Link

Photographer

Tropical Photography

Posts: 35564

Sarasota, Florida, US

billy badfinger wrote:
Is the internet a sort of "Big Brother" apparatus

Jay  Edwards wrote:
Yes, that's why the government wants to control it...

And yet it's the private sector that seems to be doing it the most.. I assume as long as there's a profit motive attached, you're ok with it?? 


To the OP, I see the same thing.. I've been looking at SSD drives and all of a sudden I'm seeing ads on MM/FB/YouTube, etc for SSD's...   So yes, the PRIVATE sector is doing a good job of figuring out and targeting you with your interests..

Jul 20 14 06:46 pm Link

Photographer

billy badfinger

Posts: 887

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

I'd like to believe that...
In fact,I'm a very uninteresting guy...and quite bad for the economy.
I only shop/buy when I have to...Def NOT a mall freak or impulse shopper.
If I have a project I'm not equipped for...I'll buy stuff.
If my Levis are just too tattered and torn...I'll buy some new ones.
Still...

Jul 20 14 06:51 pm Link

Photographer

Bill Bates

Posts: 3850

Payson, Utah, US

To the OP...just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they are not after you.

Jul 20 14 07:13 pm Link

Photographer

Lohkee

Posts: 14028

Maricopa, Arizona, US

Kincaid Blackwood wrote:
Big Brother?

The government doesn't care about you that much. The notion of surveillance is based on the assumption of perceived individual importance. To the government, you're just a 10-digit social attached to a given dollar amount in taxes. To corporations, you a potential sale out of millions of others with cash, too. They only care about people collectively.

They're not spying on you, it's just a shrewd algorithm design to sway you to part with your cash. Outside of that, Big Brother doesn't really care...

Yeah, Uh-huh. That's why NSA has agreements with most ISP's to capture your information. Have you been living under a rock to the past few years? The Internet is the ultimate government "big brother" machine.

Jul 20 14 07:50 pm Link

Photographer

Michael Bots

Posts: 8020

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

It's not like anyone that has access could scoop those nude photos or your credit card numbers. Right?


Ars editor learns feds have his old IP addresses, full credit card numbers
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014 … d-numbers/
FOIA request turns up 9 years of records, including plaintext credit card numbers.


NSA employees routinely pass around intercepted nude photos
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014 … de-photos/
"These are seen as the fringe benefits of surveillance positions,"

Jul 21 14 05:52 am Link

Photographer

Looknsee Photography

Posts: 26342

Portland, Oregon, US

Anyone who thinks they can be anonymous on the Internet is wrong.

When I was working for a Fortune 50 company 15-20 years ago, there was a guy, using an e-mail address from that company, coming onto a newsgroup forum for our product & badmouthing it.  His name wasn't in our directory, so I got concerned.  I asked him to identify himself.  He told me, "here's a quarter; call someone who cares".

Found him -- he was a contractor for the company.  I used his virtual quarter to call his great-grandboss.  He wasn't a contractor any more.

Jul 21 14 07:33 am Link

Photographer

Jay Edwards

Posts: 18616

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

Jay  Edwards wrote:
Yes, that's why the government wants to control it...

Tropical Photography wrote:
And yet it's the private sector that seems to be doing it the most.. I assume as long as there's a profit motive attached, you're ok with it?? 
...

Um, the private sector does not have the power to seize assets and imprison people.

apples/oranges

Jul 21 14 08:41 am Link

Photographer

Eastfist

Posts: 3580

Green Bay, Wisconsin, US

The Internet started out as war technology/communications. Why wouldn't it be controlled by the government/Big Brother?

Jul 21 14 08:47 am Link

Photographer

Michael Bots

Posts: 8020

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Jay  Edwards wrote:

Jay  Edwards wrote:
Yes, that's why the government wants to control it...

Um, the private sector does not have the power to seize assets and imprison people.

apples/oranges

Tell that to your bank.

Jul 21 14 10:03 am Link

Photographer

Jay Edwards

Posts: 18616

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

Michael Bots wrote:
Tell that to your bank.

Um, I am not forced to deal with a bank but I may choose to do so.

Oh, and can the bank put me in jail?

apples/oranges

Jul 21 14 10:04 am Link

Photographer

Looknsee Photography

Posts: 26342

Portland, Oregon, US

billy badfinger wrote:
Is the internet a sort of "Big Brother" apparatus

Jay  Edwards wrote:
Yes, that's why the government wants to control it...

What makes you think they don't control it already?

Tropical Photography wrote:
And yet it's the private sector that seems to be doing it the most.

You might be right.  Then again, you might be wrong.

Jul 21 14 10:05 am Link

Photographer

IrisSwope

Posts: 14857

Dallas, Texas, US

Yes, but by choice, because it's the cool thing to do.
Tell us that it's fun/a new feature to give up our privacy, and we do it willingly.

Jul 21 14 06:02 pm Link

Photographer

Kincaid Blackwood

Posts: 23492

Los Angeles, California, US

Lohkee wrote:
Yeah, Uh-huh. That's why NSA has agreements with most ISP's to capture your information. Have you been living under a rock to the past few years? The Internet is the ultimate government "big brother" machine.

You misunderstand.

The ability to do it on a selective basis is there and is exercised. The idea that they're interested in spying on everyone (or perhaps any of us here), however, is silly. The average American – artist on MM or not – just isn't doing anything that the government cares to monitor. You get in your car, buy your gas, go to some job or do some work, buy goods and pay sales tax, file your federal taxes at the end of the year. You're not doing anything special.

As such, the government doesn't care. Speak any number of keywords on your cell phone or type them out on your computer and you can send a ping. That may get you logged. Too many pings and you might be watched. But if you make it to that point, you're probably doing something outside of the average.

But is your Facebook the government's process of monitoring you 24/7? Do you think some government drone is reading all your facebook jokes and cat videos? You think the government gives enough of a shit about any of that to assign someone to watch you every second?

The average American does not warrant such special attention although we all like to think we're that important...

Jul 21 14 09:02 pm Link

Photographer

T Brown

Posts: 2460

Traverse City, Michigan, US

Kincaid Blackwood wrote:

You misunderstand.

The ability to do it on a selective basis is there and is exercised. The idea that they're interested in spying on everyone (or perhaps any of us here), however, is silly. The average American – artist on MM or not – just isn't doing anything that the government cares to monitor. You get in your car, buy your gas, go to some job or do some work, buy goods and pay sales tax, file your federal taxes at the end of the year. You're not doing anything special.

As such, the government doesn't care. Speak any number of keywords on your cell phone or type them out on your computer and you can send a ping. That may get you logged. Too many pings and you might be watched. But if you make it to that point, you're probably doing something outside of the average.

But is your Facebook the government's process of monitoring you 24/7? Do you think some government drone is reading all your facebook jokes and cat videos? You think the government gives enough of a shit about any of that to assign someone to watch you every second?

The average American does not warrant such special attention although we all like to think we're that important...

Oh yea of little paranoia....

The government, our government has the ability to capture every iota of information that zips along the information superhighway, they constantly strobe for keywords.

You may make a remark that her ass is dynamite or she's da bomb...

yeah they see that and they analyze it..they also keep tabs on the books you check out from the library, the places you shop and your purchases..

you may think that they care less about you, but just give it a test and see what happens.

and no I am not one of those conspiracy theorists, I just pay attention and read a lot.

Jul 23 14 04:24 pm Link

Photographer

Lohkee

Posts: 14028

Maricopa, Arizona, US

Kincaid Blackwood wrote:
You misunderstand.

The ability to do it on a selective basis is there and is exercised. The idea that they're interested in spying on everyone (or perhaps any of us here), however, is silly. The average American – artist on MM or not – just isn't doing anything that the government cares to monitor. You get in your car, buy your gas, go to some job or do some work, buy goods and pay sales tax, file your federal taxes at the end of the year. You're not doing anything special.

As such, the government doesn't care. Speak any number of keywords on your cell phone or type them out on your computer and you can send a ping. That may get you logged. Too many pings and you might be watched. But if you make it to that point, you're probably doing something outside of the average.

But is your Facebook the government's process of monitoring you 24/7? Do you think some government drone is reading all your facebook jokes and cat videos? You think the government gives enough of a shit about any of that to assign someone to watch you every second?

The average American does not warrant such special attention although we all like to think we're that important...

No, I don't think that I do misunderstand. What they capture, and what they are interested in pursuing, are two very different things. How do you think they find things of interest?

Answer: By sifting through a lot of uninteresting garbage to find out if the "average American" is important (or not).

Jul 23 14 04:46 pm Link

Photographer

Michael Bots

Posts: 8020

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Even if you block cookies ---


White House Website Includes Unique Non-Cookie Tracker, Conflicts With Privacy Policy
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/07/w … acy-policy


White House tracking website visitors with online ‘fingerprinting’
http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-b … rprinting/

"The White House is tracking visitors to its website, despite proudly promising that WhiteHouse.gov complies with federal privacy laws and does not use cookies. The AddThis tracker is present on every page on the site, according to EFF."


"at least five percent of the internet’s top 100,000 websites are using canvas fingerprinting, a new kind tracking technology that is nearly impossible to block using conventional privacy tools."

Jul 23 14 05:34 pm Link

Photographer

MerrillMedia

Posts: 8736

New Orleans, Louisiana, US

I think its a reflection of what the business world wants in general. Whether its a workers comp company wanting your entire medical history from birth, or a grocery store that wants your phone number, zip code, spending habits (obtained from that "rewards card" that you signed up for), people are asking for way too much personal information. Unfortunately, the average consumer doesn't have the good sense to say no.

Jul 23 14 06:24 pm Link

Photographer

T Brown

Posts: 2460

Traverse City, Michigan, US

Jul 23 14 07:11 pm Link

Photographer

Rik Williams

Posts: 4005

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Well with a name like Billy Badfinger, what do you expect?

Of course they'd be tracking you with a name like that wink

Yeah but seriously, everyone is soooo paranoid these days.

If the government can do it (spy on it's own citizens), it will, regardless of honesty, ethics, integrity, lies or blatant hypocrisy.

There's no honour in places of government anymore, only a lust for knowledge and ultimate power.

Jul 23 14 07:27 pm Link