sweetcheekscouture wrote:

I have an uncle who was a neurosurgeon and my father is a pilot.

What's your point?

Uh...?

Omaroo wrote:
Same girl interviewed for this article?

https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thread_id=145788

Interesting. It's not exactly a common name.

Strength Studios wrote:

Actually, we don't know what was in an agreement, all we know is what was stated in a casting call. What matters here is not what was listed in a casting call, but what was included in the actual contract. Even if it violated the agreement, there may be clauses that hold harmless the network for errors made by the production company. So without the actual detail of the contract, not the casting call, everyone is just guessing. A casting call is not legally binding.

That may be true, it's still a bait and switch for exploitation then.

K I C K H A M wrote:
I'm against the grain here, apparently.

They had an agreement, which is set forth at casting, and they broke the agreement.

I still have the casting blurb:

That's a casting notice, not a legal contract. It matters what's spelled out in the contract.