Forums > Model Colloquy > Sorry but your t*ts aren't big enough

Photographer

Abbitt Photography

Posts: 13562

Washington, Utah, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
I gave up with model mayhem for a while and moved to another site as it kept me busy with work 7 days a week...

Good for you for investigating other ways to market yourself.  Glad the other site is working for you.

Sep 16 14 07:03 am Link

Photographer

Justin Foto

Posts: 3622

Alberschwende, Vorarlberg, Austria

I'd shoot with you in a second! I'm near your neck of the woods quite often these days.

Sep 16 14 07:11 am Link

Photographer

Outoffocus

Posts: 631

Worcester, England, United Kingdom

Your tits are great, as is the rest of you. Add in the bush and you ought to be having no problems getting bookings. It's possible that most photographers in the Uk are sourcing models from the other site you mention, so aren't bothering much with this site.
As for the big tits thing, hard to believe, but I doubt it is representative of any but a small handful of photographers on here.

Sep 16 14 09:42 am Link

Model

peliroja-stephie

Posts: 10

Birmingham, England, United Kingdom

Thanks for the kind words everyone, Again last night I replied to a casting call for a local job which was replied with

''I love you but you are a bit too skinny for me with rather small breasts! I will send a pork pie if you like!''

This thread isn't me complaining about big or small models rather than the preference of photographers in the area which I am a tad upset about. I have worked with many plus sized model and models smaller than me, Its doesn't bother me about size as I am quite happy the way I am and at the end of the day we do have our own USP (unique selling point) But I have been rejected so so many times and offended for my size and it is starting to knock my self esteem, sad

Sep 16 14 12:37 pm Link

Photographer

Brooklyn Bridge Images

Posts: 13200

Brooklyn, New York, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
Thanks for the kind words everyone, Again last night I replied to a casting call for a local job which was replied with

''I love you but you are a bit too skinny for me with rather small breasts! I will send a pork pie if you like!''

How many times how you gotten comments like this from such absolute (as you Brits say) Wankers ?

Sep 16 14 12:42 pm Link

Model

peliroja-stephie

Posts: 10

Birmingham, England, United Kingdom

Brooklyn Bridge Images wrote:

How many times how you gotten comments like this from such absolute (as you Brits say) Wankers ?

I get this sort of thing every other day, other people are more polite but it all comes down to me not having the body type they want

Sep 16 14 12:54 pm Link

Photographer

FiveOne November

Posts: 174

West Palm Beach, Florida, US

It is my considered opinion that the OP's breasts are perfect.  Not any more perfect than anyone else's, except maybe my 50 year old MOOBS.

I guess for a model to bare herself to a photographer, it takes self confidence, which I think is the most attractive part of any model who poses nude.  And I thank them for that!

Sep 16 14 12:55 pm Link

Photographer

LeWhite

Posts: 2038

Los Angeles, California, US

They're the right size, my lense just isnt long enough.

Sep 16 14 01:19 pm Link

Model

Figures Jen B

Posts: 790

Phoenix, Arizona, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
Thanks for the kind words everyone, Again last night I replied to a casting call for a local job which was replied with

''I love you but you are a bit too skinny for me with rather small breasts! I will send a pork pie if you like!''

This thread isn't me complaining about big or small models rather than the preference of photographers in the area which I am a tad upset about. I have worked with many plus sized model and models smaller than me, Its doesn't bother me about size as I am quite happy the way I am and at the end of the day we do have our own USP (unique selling point) But I have been rejected so so many times and offended for my size and it is starting to knock my self esteem, sad

Hello,
Maybe it would help to check out the portfolio and work of the photographer before replying to their castings? If they have a portfolio full of ONLY large breasted models then know that the odds may be against you getting that casting.

Try not to take it hard when someone passes you up or turns you down, it happens all the time and the whim of the moment, (or sometimes the personal issues or quirks of a photographer) have more to do with them and nothing to do with us.

Jen
edit to add that if it is a paid casting then it likely has nothing to do with the photographer but the client and the vision they have for the shoot.

Sep 16 14 04:29 pm Link

Photographer

myfotographer

Posts: 3700

Fresno, California, US

It isn't the size, but the location.

Several of use would love to shoot them. They are just too far away.

Sep 16 14 04:32 pm Link

Photographer

DougBPhoto

Posts: 39248

Portland, Oregon, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
Thanks for the kind words everyone, Again last night I replied to a casting call for a local job which was replied with

''I love you but you are a bit too skinny for me with rather small breasts! I will send a pork pie if you like!''

This thread isn't me complaining about big or small models rather than the preference of photographers in the area which I am a tad upset about. I have worked with many plus sized model and models smaller than me, Its doesn't bother me about size as I am quite happy the way I am and at the end of the day we do have our own USP (unique selling point) But I have been rejected so so many times and offended for my size and it is starting to knock my self esteem, sad

You should not let idiots bring you down. 

If you're being rejected because your boobs are not big enough, you're probably being rejected by folks you would not want to work with anyway.

Sure, it sucks to be turned down, but those who appreciate your look will likely be far better at photographing your beauty, than someone who is fapping about taking photos for the chance to see big boobs.

Sep 16 14 04:34 pm Link

Model

MelissaAnn

Posts: 3971

Seattle, Washington, US

Your boobs are rad.  I would hire you.  big_smile

Come to the US!

Sep 16 14 07:22 pm Link

Photographer

PhotoNoPhoto

Posts: 85

Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil

I think you look wonderful dear. As you can read on here there area a lot of photographers that are interested in models of your size and shape. As someone said previously "let us know when you start your US tour." wink

Sep 16 14 08:08 pm Link

Photographer

Robert love

Posts: 17

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

I think your figure is beautiful, I don't understand why anyone would not want to work with you. I have shot all sizes & found that although a woman's body is beautiful it's also about personality, charm & charisma. I know if i were back in the UK i would definitely want to work with you as you are gorgeous.
Don't let this bother you keep on going for the photographers who do appreciate a woman with a gorgeous body as you.
Just my thoughts

Sep 17 14 09:53 am Link

Photographer

Derek Ridgers

Posts: 1625

London, England, United Kingdom

I agree with all the other positive responses on here.  I’d be very happy to shoot you and I live 25 minutes away.

Sep 17 14 10:04 am Link

Model

Figuremodel001

Posts: 342

Chicago, Illinois, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
This is so unfair, all of you awesome people are so bloody far away!!!! Where are all the English photographers! sad
I think i really need to start considering going on tour

That sounds like a good plan.

Sep 18 14 07:07 am Link

Photographer

Christopher Hartman

Posts: 54196

Buena Park, California, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
So so sick of being rejected for shoots because I've not got a great big pair.
I'm happy with my small perky breasts, why do i have to have a huge pair to get any paid work off this site?

I gave up with model mayhem for a while and moved to another site as it kept me busy with work 7 days a week but I honestly cant remember when I got a booking off MM, really not a happy girl. My portfolio isn't all that bad

You're tits are lovely. In my opinion.

Sep 18 14 07:39 am Link

Photographer

sospix

Posts: 23769

Orlando, Florida, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
This is so unfair, all of you awesome people are so bloody far away!!!! Where are all the English photographers! sad
I think i really need to start considering going on tour

I'm thinkin' Florida should be your first stop  .  .  .  wink

SOS

Sep 18 14 07:39 am Link

Photographer

ontherocks

Posts: 23575

Salem, Oregon, US

my first nude model had an impressive pair that seemed to defy gravity. only later did i look through her portfolio and noticed a "difference" shall we say in her older work. i thought she looked more natural in  her older work but the new ones were definitely attention-getting.

if you're losing work, maybe you do need to bump it up a notch or two? with the extra work you could pay them off in time.

but i didn't think art nude models needed big ones? i thought that was more for glamour.

regardless, i would happily work with you just the way you are.

Sep 18 14 07:51 am Link

Photographer

Legeros Photography LLC

Posts: 302

Sterling, Virginia, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
So so sick of being rejected for shoots because I've not got a great big pair.
I'm happy with my small perky breasts, why do i have to have a huge pair to get any paid work off this site?

I gave up with model mayhem for a while and moved to another site as it kept me busy with work 7 days a week but I honestly cant remember when I got a booking off MM, really not a happy girl. My portfolio isn't all that bad

Excuse my French...but f*ck em! Your tits are fine as they are....

Sep 18 14 08:10 am Link

Model

Gina Dee

Posts: 322

BRONX, New York, US

You appear to have a good presence and are well proportioned. So their loss.

I don't have "big" boobs but I think my proportions create the natural illusion of bigger breasts.

Sep 18 14 08:21 am Link

Photographer

NothingIsRealButTheGirl

Posts: 35726

Los Angeles, California, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
Thanks for the kind words everyone, Again last night I replied to a casting call for a local job which was replied with

''I love you but you are a bit too skinny for me with rather small breasts! I will send a pork pie if you like!''

Are they nuts? What kind of place is Camberley-Frimley? No wonder Scotland is voting today to have it expelled from Great Britain.

Sep 18 14 08:40 am Link

Artist/Painter

Hunter GWPB

Posts: 8179

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
''I love you but you are a bit too skinny for me with rather small breasts! I will send a pork pie if you like!''

Under what possible circumstances would you work with the moron that made this statement?  Please change your out look on life.  He wasn't rejecting you.  He was informing you of his low class nuts attitude nuts and allowing you to avoid a horrible shoot with a horrible person.

Sep 18 14 08:58 am Link

Model

Victoria Ellis

Posts: 129

San Diego, California, US

In my experience many photographers prefer a proportionate figure to top - heavy, at least for art nudes.

If you want to do more glamour, maybe big push up bras? There are plenty of ways to be sexy, expressions, good posing, attitude.

I do tons of exercises for my butt and legs. That's something I can control!

-Skinny Glamour and Art Nude Model

Sep 18 14 09:11 am Link

Photographer

Farenell Photography

Posts: 18832

Albany, New York, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
So so sick of being rejected for shoots because I've not got a great big pair.
I'm happy with my small perky breasts, why do i have to have a huge pair to get any paid work off this site?

I sympathize but like it or not, this is an industry based on looks.

The only other advice I can give (without going into a portfolio critique which will merit a brigging) is to market yourself &/or use talents that go beyond the "just another pretty face." Normally, this means nudes but you already do that. It can also mean but is not limited to incorporating a unique talent (like classical or modern dance) or incorporating your own unique fashion sense that makes people go gaga or creating your own outfits from scratch. It could also mean knowing of or offering a venue to shoot in, particularly for those who are traveling & may not be able to scout locations in advance. Same could be said that if the online world like MM isn't giving you what you need or expect, try other avenues (maybe its a different networking site, maybe its approaching brick & mortar associations or venues like university art departments or cooperatives). Maybe that simply means either doing a tour to a bigger metro area or a willingness to travel there or simply listing yourself there in the hopes of actually being found.

Sep 18 14 09:13 am Link

Photographer

Light and Lens Studio

Posts: 3450

Sisters, Oregon, US

Some folks like to drive around in huge SUV's.  Others like to drive around in smaller well designed vehicles like Porsche's  or BMW.  You are definitely in the Porsche, BMW class.

You are just stunningly beautiful.  That's really all you need to know.

Sep 18 14 09:28 am Link

Photographer

Laubenheimer

Posts: 9317

New York, New York, US

Light and Lens Studio wrote:
Some folks like to drive around in huge SUV's.  Others like to drive around in smaller well designed vehicles like Porsche's  or BMW.  You are definitely in the Porsche, BMW class.

You are just stunningly beautiful.  That's really all you need to know.

so you are saying the huge SUV is not well designed? hmm

Sep 18 14 09:30 am Link

Photographer

Ken Warren Photography

Posts: 933

GLENMOORE, Pennsylvania, US

A model is chosen for a project based on her capabilities, including her appearance, her limits, her skills as shown in her portfolio, and other attributes. The responses you say you're getting make me think that:

A) You're applying to casting calls which are for glamour shoots, i.e. you're applying for something that you're probably not interested in and (honestly) don't have the figure for. I've noticed that a lot of casting calls are, umm, let's just say "overly vague" so this could be on the photographer for not making requirements clear.
B) British photographers have a breast fetish even greater than US photographers.
C) The casting calls you've applied to were posted by socially inept individuals.

Probably it will work out to a combination of A) and C).

Also, as others have said, if you were in my area I'd be interested in shooting with you; I think you have a fine figure.

Sep 18 14 09:52 am Link

Photographer

Grady Richardson

Posts: 278

Houston, Texas, US

Jerry Nemeth wrote:
I have seem models with modest implants.  If it is not overdone they can look good.

There's a great variation is the quality of implant work - from beautiful to hideous. I knew one young lady who had a beautiful - is "set" the proper word? - I would never have know they were implants if she hadn't told me.

The problem with making a blanket statement about hating implants is that the worse the work, the more likely you are to realize that they are implants, but if they're really good you'll think that they are natural.

That said, I agree with the majority here - I think that your breasts are lovely, and would certainly work with you.

Sep 18 14 12:40 pm Link

Photographer

Benjamen McGuire

Posts: 3991

Portland, Oregon, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
So so sick of being rejected for shoots because I've not got a great big pair.
I'm happy with my small perky breasts, why do i have to have a huge pair to get any paid work off this site?

In our animal history, we men were more attracted sexually to women with a larger fat stores at the mammary glands to amply and more readily feed our offspring. Modern man has the luxury of varied taste in size and aesthetics beyond sexual instinct, though the instinct does somewhat universally remain. What that means is that while many like them "small", bigger boobs will pretty much always get more attention. Even from those who also like them small. That means that if I'm shooting something where boobs are emphasized and mass appeal is important, I'd go for a pair larger than yours.

My personal preference and choices, however, tend to lean toward the ibtc.

Sep 18 14 03:56 pm Link

Photographer

Christian B Aragon

Posts: 261

Sparks, Nevada, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
So so sick of being rejected for shoots because I've not got a great big pair.
I'm happy with my small perky breasts, why do i have to have a huge pair to get any paid work off this site?

I gave up with model mayhem for a while and moved to another site as it kept me busy with work 7 days a week but I honestly cant remember when I got a booking off MM, really not a happy girl. My portfolio isn't all that bad

I'd be ecstatic to work with you. You're on the wrong side of the pond though!!! sad

Sep 18 14 04:03 pm Link

Photographer

D-Light

Posts: 629

Newcastle, Limerick, Ireland

Whether the size of your breasts is an issue depends on what the photographer is booking you to do. I've worked with models with even smaller breasts than you, look at my portfolio and see.

However, there are times that the model's breast size is an issue. For example, a local lingerie shop owner booked me to do some shots for her recently. She specified that the model should be at least 5' 8", curvy, with at least a C cup, preferably D. She felt that this made her lingerie look better. I wouldn't have booked you in this case.

It's possible that you're being rejected by photographers who just want to see large breasts, the photography is secondary.

Sep 19 14 08:54 am Link

Model

Skyler Bleu

Posts: 527

San Jose, California, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
So so sick of being rejected for shoots because I've not got a great big pair.
I'm happy with my small perky breasts, why do i have to have a huge pair to get any paid work off this site?

I gave up with model mayhem for a while and moved to another site as it kept me busy with work 7 days a week but I honestly cant remember when I got a booking off MM, really not a happy girl. My portfolio isn't all that bad

... and then when you do have a great pic PERFECT pair-- they will come up with other excuses to not shoot with you. Excuzles Excuzles

What ever happens to just saying up front- no I do not want to shoot with you. LOL

Sep 20 14 10:40 am Link

Photographer

Bare Essential Photos

Posts: 3605

Upland, California, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
So so sick of being rejected for shoots because I've not got a great big pair.
I'm happy with my small perky breasts, why do i have to have a huge pair to get any paid work off this site?

I gave up with model mayhem for a while and moved to another site as it kept me busy with work 7 days a week but I honestly cant remember when I got a booking off MM, really not a happy girl. My portfolio isn't all that bad

Models have preferences regarding who or what they want from a shoot, so do photographers.

Sep 20 14 04:31 pm Link

Photographer

L O C U T U S

Posts: 1746

Bangor, Maine, US

peliroja-stephie wrote:
So so sick of being rejected for shoots because I've not got a great big pair.
I'm happy with my small perky breasts, why do i have to have a huge pair to get any paid work off this site?

I gave up with model mayhem for a while and moved to another site as it kept me busy with work 7 days a week but I honestly cant remember when I got a booking off MM, really not a happy girl. My portfolio isn't all that bad

I think you're awesome. I'd hire you.

Sep 20 14 04:37 pm Link

Model

Rose Valentina

Posts: 84

Durham, England, United Kingdom

I encountered the same thing when I arrived in the UK last year. I was surprised to see so many casting calls stipulating C cup and above. If it's glamour it makes a bit more sense but shouldn't matter for artistic nude. I always study the port of the photographer who has posted the casting before I consider applying. If his port is full of big breasted women, I simply move on.

Sep 23 14 02:15 am Link

Photographer

DevotedCreatives Studio

Posts: 691

London, England, United Kingdom

Speaking candidly as someone who works in print and has worked in ads:

In the UK the glamour world focuses on boobs, fashion on stick thin women who are tall and lifestyle tends to be a mix of both with "plus-size" girls thrown in for "balance". There's also a huge growth in the fitness model market.

You're none of those. There isn't much commercial value in the UK market for art model figures like yours.

Sep 23 14 07:13 am Link

Photographer

Derek Ridgers

Posts: 1625

London, England, United Kingdom

Black Technicolor Art wrote:
Speaking candidly as someone who works in print and has worked in ads:

In the UK the glamour world focuses on boobs, fashion on stick thin women who are tall and lifestyle tends to be a mix of both with "plus-size" girls thrown in for "balance". There's also a huge growth in the fitness model market.

You're none of those. There isn't much commercial value in the UK market for art model figures like yours.

I disagree Jon.

The OP is already working 7 days a week.

It’s more the MM photographers that she has a problem with. 

But I think there is work for models with her dimensions in the UK.  I also work in print and advertising and the model that my main advertising client currently uses was found via MM and she’s roughly the same shape.  Everyone on the client side loves her but tbh mainly because of her great look and charming personality.  For them, there is a great deal of commercial value in her look because it's dead right for their product/s. There’s no nudity or partial nudity required and her breast size hasn't come into it.

And, although it’s ten years since I worked for any UK ladmag, even there a model doesn’t always need big breasts if everything else is wonderful.  What about Arabella Drummond?

Sep 23 14 08:09 am Link

Photographer

DevotedCreatives Studio

Posts: 691

London, England, United Kingdom

Derek Ridgers wrote:
I disagree Jon.

The OP is already working 7 days a week.

It’s more the MM photographers that she has a problem with. 

But I think there is work for models with her dimensions in the UK.  I also work in print and advertising and the model that my main advertising client currently uses was found via MM and she’s roughly the same shape.  Everyone on the client side loves her but tbh mainly because of her great look and charming personality.  For them, there is a great deal of commercial value in her look because it's dead right for their product/s. There’s no nudity or partial nudity required and her breast size hasn't come into it.

And, although it’s ten years since I worked for any UK ladmag, even there a model doesn’t always need big breasts if everything else is wonderful.  What about Arabella Drummond?

If she's working 7 days a week, what's the problem?

RE Arebella: the trend towards "alt-girls" has overcome the big-boob thing somewhat (mellisa clarke is another example) but again, the OP doesn't fit that market either.

It's all about being lucky when it comes to trends or adapting to fit what the market wants. The most successful models and photographers have done exactly that, they've capitlised/benefited from a trend or they've constantly adapted to stay on top.

Survival of the fittest 101. Welcome to Earth.

As for togs on MM, there are plenty who want to shoot girls without big breasts, but are they just offering TF because its for their personal projects? Are MM togs regularly being commisioned to shoot petite/art models models like the OP over here in the UK? Apparently not. The market is significantly smaller than the other fields I've mentioned, you disagree with that too? Then why does she find the situation as it is?

Sep 23 14 09:35 am Link

Model

saraamarie04

Posts: 2

Tempe, Arizona, US

I may not have boobs but when I am old my boobs will still remain perky and gravity wont effect them like you big chested women.

Sep 23 14 09:42 am Link