Forums > Model Colloquy > Have you been aroused by Nude Models

Photographer

Henri3

Posts: 7392

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

Gunfitr wrote:
I used to shoot with a particular girl who would go to tugging on the clasp of her jeans, and unbuttoning her shirt, and pushing up a little cleavage, all the while making the most intense eye contact you would ever beleive and she looked like she was whispering really really naughty things to herself.
Don't know a guy that has shot her that didn't completely understand what she was up to.  If as a guy that didn't give you a bit of wood, then you don't deserve to call yourself a man. 
Mark

I shoot a good deal of nudework , but would LOVE to find a model like this, who really knows her stuff, as model's who can act convincingly are SO rare. Actually the model I shot nudes with yesterday was one such gal, who could be sweet/coy & erotic at once. Quite a treat. Quite a gal.

Mar 21 07 11:34 am Link

Photographer

Ryan Colford Studios

Posts: 2286

Brooklyn, New York, US

Mens fashion wrote:
I prefer that my nude models not arouse me, touching a photographer is always a bad idea.

Always is a strong word.  What about not at a shoot? Not by a model...

Personally I like to be touched, just not at work.  :-D

Mar 21 07 11:37 am Link

Model

Carole Hayes

Posts: 876

Garland, Texas, US

Novus Ordo wrote:
Men are visual creatures and turned on by what they see.  Women not so much.

You seriously believe that?  Anyone else? 

I'm a woman and I have absolutely no trouble being turned on by things that I see.  I'd say I'm at least as visually oriented as any man I've ever met -- more so than some of them....

Edit:  as for the original question, I think I can remember a time or two when I was aware that a photographer may have become aroused during a shoot -- but since they were ignoring it, so did I.  (It is a slightly uncomfortable feeling, but as long as long as he remains professional and doesn't change his demeanor, I'm fine.)

Now, if a photographer were to comment on it, make jokes about it, or in any way draw attention to it, I'd probably have a hard time relaxing.  I guess if it ever happens, I can pull this thread up again and post about it....  wink

Mar 21 07 01:55 pm Link

Photographer

Gone Til Novus-ember

Posts: 11440

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Carole Hayes wrote:

You seriously believe that?  Anyone else? 

I'm a woman and I have absolutely no trouble being turned on by things that I see.  I'd say I'm at least as visually oriented as any man I've ever met -- more so than some of them....

There are exceptions to every rule but YES I do.

Mar 21 07 02:10 pm Link

Model

Carole Hayes

Posts: 876

Garland, Texas, US

Novus Ordo wrote:
There are exceptions to every rule but YES I do.

Huh.

That makes me want to take a poll....  (I know I'm not a typical woman, but I didn't think I was soooo different....)

Mar 21 07 02:16 pm Link

Photographer

Dirty Photography

Posts: 190

Fayetteville, North Carolina, US

Nicholaus wrote:
anyone who was aroused is fucking sick!!!!! And you wonder why models want escorts!!!

put this guy in a shoot naked with jenna jamison or pam anderson while they are completely naked and then let him say we are sick or unprofessional.. 

its hard not to be aroused in some way shape of form. you may not show it with a raging hardon but you may have a though on what you are seeing.. the poiont is to not let the model see it or hear it or know what teh hell is going on with it.. if duct taping it to your belly is the only thing that you can do to not appear unprofessional then have atter.. i wouldnt.. if you cant be professional during the shoot then you need to excuse yourself from the room gain composure and either carry on or stop the session..

Mar 21 07 05:44 pm Link

Photographer

GianCarlo Images

Posts: 2427

Brooklyn, New York, US

I like to work with a semi to full erection; It feels good and it flatters the models.

Mar 21 07 05:49 pm Link

Photographer

Shiva Photo

Posts: 1961

East Hills, New York, US

Cre8tivImages wrote:
Once again, an immature, moronic topic.

Have a sense of humor my man.  It has been a rib tickler. Some of the responders can unseat Jay Leno

Mar 22 07 06:43 am Link

Model

Tina Ginger

Posts: 445

Magnolia, Arkansas, US

sdsteve wrote:
man...that was hard to read....after getting through all the mistakes, i get the subject and oh yeah...i walk around with wood at all my nude shoots.....i just duct tape it to my belly

HAHA!

Mar 22 07 06:56 am Link

Photographer

The Divine Emily Fine

Posts: 20454

Owings Mills, Maryland, US

Novus Ordo wrote:
There are exceptions to every rule but YES I do.

I'm more of a visual person myself...don't like admitting it, but yeah, I notice things like that. I notice a guys ass. If he's facing me naked, I won't be focused on his eyes, honestly. What makes me odd is I go up and tell the guy he's got a nice ass. XD

Then again, being that I am "in the mood" about 24/7 and have had boyfriends tell me "tonight we're just gonna watch TV," I could be wrong about what turns me on.


Oh well.

Mar 22 07 07:38 am Link

Photographer

Tortured Artist

Posts: 414

Rockville, Maryland, US

naked= beauty=appealing=exciting...oversimplification and yes we male of the apecies do tend to be a bit more visual when it comes to getting aroused...and if you get a model who really knows how to project well then yes arousal will occur..hopefully more mental then physical..i can hide the one, but the other..not so much:-)

Mar 22 07 07:44 am Link

Photographer

Natas Vandele

Posts: 1646

Wait, so i'm supposed to wear pants when I shoot?

Mar 22 07 08:01 am Link

Photographer

J C ModeFotografie

Posts: 14718

Los Angeles, California, US

Carole Hayes wrote:
You seriously believe that?  Anyone else? 

I'm a woman and I have absolutely no trouble being turned on by things that I see.  I'd say I'm at least as visually oriented as any man I've ever met -- more so than some of them....

Edit:  as for the original question, I think I can remember a time or two when I was aware that a photographer may have become aroused during a shoot -- but since they were ignoring it, so did I.  (It is a slightly uncomfortable feeling, but as long as long as he remains professional and doesn't change his demeanor, I'm fine.)

Now, if a photographer were to comment on it, make jokes about it, or in any way draw attention to it, I'd probably have a hard time relaxing.  I guess if it ever happens, I can pull this thread up again and post about it....  wink

Really now?  I thought that women were aroused by chocolate and expensive gifts.  After all, we are living in a material world . . .

JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER

Mar 22 07 08:06 am Link

Photographer

The Divine Emily Fine

Posts: 20454

Owings Mills, Maryland, US

JAY carreon wrote:

Really now?  I thought that women were aroused by chocolate and expensive gifts.  After all, we are living in a material world . . .

JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER

Unless the expensive gift is The Rabbit, I won't be aroused by the material things.
Chocolate maybe...

Mar 22 07 08:11 am Link

Photographer

Kentsoul

Posts: 9739

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US

My work is about arousal and sexuality, so it would be ridiculously disingenuous to deny that my own sexuality is involved in the images.  That said, it would be most accurate to say that the images I make are things that have aroused me in the past...and may well arouse me in the future.  While I'm actually making the images, I'm usually preoccupied with arousing the viewer rather than worrying about getting off myself.

Mar 22 07 11:49 am Link

Photographer

Fotografia-di-Asia

Posts: 6118

Park City, Utah, US

Melvin Moten Jr wrote:
My work is about arousal and sexuality, so it would be ridiculously disingenuous to deny that my own sexuality is involved in the images.  That said, it would be most accurate to say that the images I make are things that have aroused me in the past...and may well arouse me in the future.  While I'm actually making the images, I'm usually preoccupied with arousing the viewer rather than worrying about getting off myself.

ditto.

i usually sweat like hell during the shoot trying to get things right. during the shoot, i am all about creating something that makes the viewer excited. i guess that makes me excited. any thought during the shoot should be related to that.

Mar 22 07 11:56 am Link

Photographer

Craig A McKenzie

Posts: 1767

Marine City, Michigan, US

Bob Randall Photography wrote:
I'm right there with you Steve, I tape it to my ankle.

Hey Bob, perhaps you should be standing when shooting, and the whole ankle thing could be avoided.

Mar 22 07 12:03 pm Link

Photographer

Vizual Synergi Imaging

Posts: 80

Aspen Hill, Maryland, US

Reading the responses here would lead one to believe that photographers are either total horn-dogs or castrated androids...Last time I checked photographers(male or female) are living breathing human beings,organism who will almost invariably respond in one fashion or another to the most primal stimuli known to our species(ya know, seeing the opposite gender, or in some cases the same, NAKED lol....). Point being, ANYBODY'S pulse, temperature and respiration rate should at least twitch a bit initially, unless you're a total stiff(no not the male appendage, I mean DEAD lol). Either that, or there is something seriously wrong with you physiologically....
            Now, many will be able to focus on the task at hand, contain obvious outward signs of arousal and be purely a photographer, while others will act like rabbits in heat and make total asses of themselves. Obviously, there will be varying degrees of response from person to person....It's really no different than being a doctor, and besides, after one sees enough naked bodies on a regular basis, most tend to get somewhat "desensitized" to that stimulus.
            It's all about self-control, mind over matter, it's following the head that contains the thinking brain, not the little one that has nothing more than hypersensitive nerve endings lol...Also, what was the intent is in regard to getting someone to undress for you in the first place?....It's either for the camera to create art, or it's to get some...

Mar 22 07 12:32 pm Link

Photographer

Colin Talcroft

Posts: 1078

Santa Rosa, California, US

This place gets sillier all the time. I officially declare this thread silly. Grow up.

Mar 22 07 12:35 pm Link

Photographer

Kristine Kreations

Posts: 1629

Davis, California, US

carlo Di Paolo wrote:
I like to work with a semi to full erection; It feels good and it flatters the models.

flatters??  try scares/ sickens.

Personally, I think it's just human nature to be aroused, but it's unprofessional to let it SHOW.  You can want to throw the camera away and take the model right then and there, but keep it to yourself and show a little self-control.  I like the duct tape idea... just be careful taking it off! lol.

Mar 22 07 12:41 pm Link

Model

Nemesis73

Posts: 2442

Dayton, Alabama, US

This is just like anywhere else when dealing with the workplace ... doesn't matter what the female employee wears, you're supposed to not pay attention to the fact she's TRYING to get your attention, TRYING to use her ASSets to make you forget she's underqualified, hired by affirmative action/EEO/EOE quota requirements ... you're supposed to look at her like she's got just as much swinging meat as you do and treat her like one of the guys (but damn you to hell if you don't open the door for her) ... maybe you should talk race cars and football with her, and offer her a beer and a cigar while you're shooting and ask her about those Yankees.

Hell I dunno ... mixing Political Correctness with Human Nature never works. 
N.

Mar 22 07 12:43 pm Link

Photographer

K. Adam Stockstill

Posts: 338

Austin, Indiana, US

How can anyone get aroused by seeing someone naked?  Thats just absured.



Paleeese.  Not only is nudity beautiful, Its freakin HOT!

Mar 22 07 12:44 pm Link

Photographer

Kentsoul

Posts: 9739

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US

Colin Talcroft wrote:
This place gets sillier all the time. I officially declare this thread silly. Grow up.

I actually found the OP's question quite interesting.  Granted, most of the replies have been silly, but in a way, they still answer the question.

Mar 22 07 12:45 pm Link

Model

Big A-Larger Than Life

Posts: 33451

The Woodlands, Texas, US

Don't forget about puppies and taking us out to nice restaurants  big_smile  And shiny exotic cars   




JAY carreon wrote:

Really now?  I thought that women were aroused by chocolate and expensive gifts.  After all, we are living in a material world . . .

JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER

Mar 22 07 05:02 pm Link

Photographer

DavidSouthBeach

Posts: 206

Miami Beach, Florida, US

Nicholaus wrote:
anyone who was aroused is fucking sick!!!!! And you wonder why models want escorts!!!

Moron.

Mar 22 07 05:10 pm Link

Photographer

Vito

Posts: 4581

Brooklyn, New York, US

Daniela V wrote:
I'm not assuming what the OP meant. I want the OP (so do others) to come back and clarify what he meant. It makes a difference to me. And, c'mon, I didn't say "raging, pants ripping, nail hammering woody"...now who's being extreme?

I know you and you know me. How would I deal with it? You know I'd be embarassed- you know that. Would I ignore it? I don't know, it's never happened to me. I would think I would not because it would make a difference with my shoot. Part of me would sit there posing thinking "well, he's not even paying attention to if the lighting and everything is perfect"...and I would be right.

I, just like any other person, find it difficult to concentrate on anything else when I'm aroused. So, I think it's safe to assume that if the photographer is that turned on, that he isn't paying attention to the actual shoot.

Why do you think he wouldn't be able to do his job just because you're doing yours?
You add "and I would be right". How do you know how any photographer will react to being aroused during a shoot. I'll bet many of your photographers were, but didn't mention it and maybe were not "enough" to enable you to tell.

Mar 22 07 05:30 pm Link

Photographer

Thomas Scott Photo

Posts: 5

Richmond, Virginia, US

Oddly, not until I know I'm in my groove and then, though I'm turned on, it has nothing to do with the model.  Call it a Zen moment.

As an interesting counter to that, Rodney Smith once told me when I asked him about his shooting, "No matter who I'm shooting, I fall completely head-over-heels in love with my subject.  It's how I make my images work."

Thanks for the fun read.

Mar 22 07 07:15 pm Link

Photographer

Travis Feisthamel Photo

Posts: 671

Watertown, New York, US

Mar 22 07 09:00 pm Link

Photographer

LuckyShots Photography

Posts: 360

Grafton, Illinois, US

Hey look, I'm pointing as I change my glass with both hands!

It doesn't matter how "engrossed in the art of photography" you are, unless your a corpse a beautiful naked girl is going to push some buttons.  Stand at attention men these things happen, just keep your soldiers in the barracks.

...I can't believe I even replied to this.

Mar 22 07 09:10 pm Link

Photographer

Travis Feisthamel Photo

Posts: 671

Watertown, New York, US

They don't call me tripod for nothing. LOL Couldn't resist. smile This is a funny thread.

Mar 22 07 09:49 pm Link

Photographer

J C ModeFotografie

Posts: 14718

Los Angeles, California, US

Have you gotten soaked from falling into the ocean?

JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER

Mar 22 07 09:50 pm Link

Model

Melissa D

Posts: 33

New York, New York, US

Shiva Photo wrote:

Well end the suspense what was it that did it ?

wow is that why you started this thread? I think that is very unappropriate.

Mar 22 07 09:56 pm Link

Model

MelissaLynnette LaDiva

Posts: 50816

Leawood, Kansas, US

JAY carreon wrote:
Have you gotten soaked from falling into the ocean?

JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER

**smirk**

Mar 22 07 09:59 pm Link

Photographer

Nihilus

Posts: 10888

Nashville, Tennessee, US

Melvin Moten Jr wrote:
My work is about arousal and sexuality, so it would be ridiculously disingenuous to deny that my own sexuality is involved in the images.  That said, it would be most accurate to say that the images I make are things that have aroused me in the past...and may well arouse me in the future.  While I'm actually making the images, I'm usually preoccupied with arousing the viewer rather than worrying about getting off myself.

I'm debating making a trip to the April Collingwood shoot (despite budget constraints) so I might have time to pick your brain in person. smile

Mar 22 07 09:59 pm Link

Photographer

Shiva Photo

Posts: 1961

East Hills, New York, US

Melissa D wrote:
wow is that why you started this thread? I think that is very unappropriate.

No ! But you cant leave the viewers making wild guesses. Either tell the whole story or dont start one at all.

Mar 22 07 10:00 pm Link

Photographer

The Divine Emily Fine

Posts: 20454

Owings Mills, Maryland, US

If a thread has "nude" in the title, I promise you, I will be there! naked!

Mar 22 07 10:55 pm Link

Model

niuyf

Posts: 360

New York, New York, US

Emily Fine wrote:
If a thread has "nude" in the title, I promise you, I will be there! naked!

My guess is, if a thread has the word "nude" in the title, at least half the MM community will be there naked... all typing with one hand.

Mar 22 07 11:04 pm Link

Photographer

Nihilus

Posts: 10888

Nashville, Tennessee, US

Emily Fine wrote:
If a thread has "nude" in the title, I promise you, I will be there! naked!

Liar! There is no nudity in your port! tongue

Mar 22 07 11:38 pm Link

Photographer

Patrick Shipstad

Posts: 4630

Burbank, California, US

This thread is giving me a soft-on.

Mar 22 07 11:42 pm Link

Model

confident one

Posts: 2

Denver, Colorado, US

mmmm i'm aroused reading it lol lmao

Mar 22 07 11:45 pm Link