Photographer
A-M-P
Posts: 18465
Orlando, Florida, US
Just took these 10 minutes ago totally unrelated to modelmayhem style photography but here goes anyways. I'm linking from FB so there might be shitty FB compression going on ![https://scontent-a-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1466307_10202554217765881_1672014664_n.jpg]() ![https://scontent-a-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/537352_10202554217645878_1958689823_n.jpg]() ![https://scontent-b-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1451574_10202554216605852_2085722427_n.jpg]()
Makeup Artist
Jade Brady
Posts: 18
Manchester, England, United Kingdom
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Dave McDermott wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131110/10/527fd11f808a7_m.jpg]()
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131110/10/527fd148888bd_m.jpg]() These both bore me to death 
the first one- *always watch for where the light is hitting your model, it should be on her face not on her shoulder!
*Watch for facial expressions because this one is not a good one.
second one- model is too close to the background, crop is odd and the outfit is terrible
Photographer
Mark Ruddick
Posts: 117
London, Ontario, Canada
Model
HEATHER 19
Posts: 1156
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Photographer
Jorge Kreimer
Posts: 3716
San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico
Photographer
Rik Williams
Posts: 4005
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Jade Brady wrote:
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/34368307
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/34447493
These are my 2 current fave shots, i know im a makeup artist and the other one isnt a beauty shot but i like it, would love your opinion x 2 lovely images!
The first one is very interesting, the makeup application looks well done.
Perhaps the photographer could have done a more higher end retouch and given you a more flattering picture!!
but that's not your fault
I really love the makeup in this second one, you're good 
Again maybe slight problem w retouching but no big deal
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Mark Ruddick wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131117/16/52895c499f2cc.jpg]() I actually hate it.
The post processing, the crop, the models expression.. The lace
So for a critique I'd say maybe look at the professionals, study portraiture and keep working at it.
Model
David E Simmons
Posts: 133
New York, New York, US
Can you critique these please ![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131119/14/528be2a505b22_m.jpg]() ![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131119/16/528c0510dc923_m.jpg]()
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
HEATHER 19 wrote:
Hi
New work, port
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/34055754 Heather heather heather.......
The one on the left.. Your expression is TERRIBLE
I'm sorry, still looking confused/ lost.. Not sexy
The full body shot on the otherside is way more what a models expression should look like!
Natural easy sexy
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Jorge Kreimer wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/130927/18/524633fc85e40.jpg]() Hate it Jorge!
We know you're not about being conventional and following rules
You make art and not what "should be"
But personally for me it's not working.. The eyes and the mouth, just no!
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Rik Williams wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131114/02/5284acaab84b8.jpg]() While I do enjoy some of your work this particular photo is super boring for me.
My 3 biggest problems are
* no connection with model
* THe distracting hands/elbows
* her expression
In my opinion this photo does not stand out!
Photographer
Jorge Kreimer
Posts: 3716
San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico
RachelReilly wrote:
Hate it Jorge!
We know you're not about being conventional and following rules
You make art and not what "should be"
But personally for me it's not working.. The eyes and the mouth, just no! Lol, ok, thanks.
Photographer
Reystignac
Posts: 22
Ontario, California, US
Photographer
Reystignac
Posts: 22
Ontario, California, US
Photographer
Rik Williams
Posts: 4005
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
RachelReilly wrote:
While I do enjoy some of your work this particular photo is super boring for me.
My 3 biggest problems are
* no connection with model
* THe distracting hands/elbows
* her expression
In my opinion this photo does not stand out! Thanks Rachel! It's history.
This any better?
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/34474095 18+
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
David E Simmons wrote:
Can you critique these please
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131119/14/528be2a505b22_m.jpg]()
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131119/16/528c0510dc923_m.jpg]() this is all very amature work.
I guess you have to start somewhere right?
If would really love to pursue modeling seriously i would start studying mens fashion magazine, practicing in front of the mirror and working with better photographers, you will most likely need to pay them, but think of the great experience/ photos you will have gained
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Reystignac wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/130917/00/523801a87b3b2.jpg]() First one- I don't see anything technically wrong. I like the location and the post processing. The problem
Is I've seen this style done 1099654578 times before haha
And I would have liked to see more light on the models face
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Reystignac wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131120/00/528c70df3a2d3.jpg]() I like this! I get that it's supposed to be edgy with the shadows but again id like to see more light on the models face.
I don't know what length you shot this at but perhaps your perspective is off a bit. Models arm looks tiny! (Maybe she's just tiny )
Model
Marla Pandora
Posts: 2815
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Model
David E Simmons
Posts: 133
New York, New York, US
RachelReilly wrote:
this is all very amature work.
I guess you have to start somewhere right?
If would really love to pursue modeling seriously i would start studying mens fashion magazine, practicing in front of the mirror and working with better photographers, you will most likely need to pay them, but think of the great experience/ photos you will have gained May I ask what is amature about the pictures? Is it my poses? the setting?
Photographer
Clara Pathe
Posts: 3
Kirkland, Washington, US
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
David E Simmons wrote:
May I ask what is amature about the pictures? Is it my poses? the setting? Everything really. the poses, not so much the setting but the way the setting was handled and the post processing.
Photographer
Norman Ding
Posts: 68
New York, New York, US
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Marlene Potfer wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131121/00/528dc12bd889e.jpg]() this is a cool idea!
I am a bit disturbed by the shadows though they are way too dark!
but as far as you, i do like your face and your pose
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Katerina Marie wrote:
Me please :3
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/34501519
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/34468049 The first photo is a bit disturbing in a good way.
you being the model there is not much to critique as all i can see are your eyes and hair haha.
Your eyes do look beautiful though.
Second photo, the first thing i noticed was the HORRIBLE black and white.. i dont know what the photographer did, looks off
I know this is not your fault but it really bothers me.
The lighting in this picture really distracts from you the model.
i think your pose is nice and facial expression is just ehhhhh...
Model
Marla Pandora
Posts: 2815
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
RachelReilly wrote:
this is a cool idea!
I am a bit disturbed by the shadows though they are way too dark!
but as far as you, i do like your face and your pose Thank you very much for taking the time to leave your feedback, I'm very happy with it
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Norman Ding wrote:
Would love to hear your opinion!
https://modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32852542 firstly, not enough contrast in this photo, esp with a dark skinned model.
this location looks cool enough but what the fuck is going on with her outfit!??! and even worse her pose!!!
This photo makes no sense. Why is she awkwardly hugging/ leaning on these rocks? and why does it look like she just got home from work? The choice of wardrobe is not good at all.
Photographer
RachelReilly
Posts: 1748
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Meghan Devlin wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131116/23/52886e8959b75_m.jpg]()
This is my newest. ok ill start off with the good.
COOL ASS COUCH! I really want one
tThe colors in this are vibrant and light.
your pose is not bad
The bad:
your expression looks scared and confused.. not sexy
and at the end of the day its just a photo of a girl standing on a couch in a room..
SUPER BORING.
Model
Vinny
Posts: 96
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, US
Photographer
Laura Elizabeth Photo
Posts: 2253
Rochester, New York, US
I keep thinking I already posted in this thread but maybe not so I'm wondering about this one. It's one of my newest shots. ![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/131125/09/529384bfeb46f_m.jpg]()
|
