Ready for critiques as usual https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/40498175 My aim is to show nude pic with no nudity to bypass the silly censorship of social networks which paradoxically allow extreme violence (racism, sexism, insults, extremism, terrorism etc.) No retouches Mar 30 19 06:40 am Link You've met your stated goal in the OP. I find it difficult to critique because I wonder what story you are telling? It may tell that story but I just am unable to parse it. She is lovely. Apr 01 19 09:58 am Link r4u wrote: about the only thing to be said: Apr 10 19 12:31 pm Link The plain wall background and plain red couch cover give it a more ordinary feel, but otherwise she is posed nicely. Image seems a touch soft... might be due to using a cheaper lens. Retouching could improve the skin if used judiciously. Apr 14 19 02:04 am Link After looking again I do have comments. Based on how huge her feet are (and the tight crop), it appears you had limited space and shot close in with a wide angle lens. Sometimes that works, this time not so much. I would like to see more space above her head and a little more below her shoes. Overall I think this image would have looked better if you could get farther back and zoom in while leaving just a bit of extra space. The sliver of light across the lower right side would have been easy to fix prior to snapping the shutter. A detail but I was distracted by it. Again, without knowing the intention I find it difficult to parse the model's expression. It is my impression that she has had a few good bong hits since she appears to be staring blankly into space. I am not saying that is good or bad, it may well be the story you wanted to tell and she just went blank for the image. Hope this helps! Cheers, Michael Apr 15 19 01:31 pm Link Thanks for yours comments. you speak mainly of technique when I point the hypocrisy of the social networks towards the naked while the violence, the racism, the discriminations (sexism, homophobia, etc) are tolerated there May 01 19 09:14 am Link r4u wrote: My first comment in the first critique was: May 01 19 10:46 am Link |