Model

Bexy82

Posts: 2

Colorado Springs, Colorado, US

Im a new to MM... wanted some honest opinions on the pics I posted.

Sep 10 05 02:06 pm Link

Photographer

commart

Posts: 6078

Hagerstown, Maryland, US

"hmmmm" may do for a start.  Get rid of everything else.  Then pick up an art history, and as you look through it, look for yourself in it.  You're there in dozens of ways.  The descendents of those pictures or their equals in beauty, creativity, or humanity may be the ones you want.

There's a little thing going in contemporary advertising (and going on with Leonard Nimoy) over picturing "real women" rather than (willowy sylphs) models.  That may be worth looking into.  Form fits certain art forms or concepts.  Grow familiar with the past and present as regards the appearance of women in art and entertainment, and you can start to look for photographic virtues in what you may do as well as artistic ones.

Sep 10 05 02:20 pm Link

Photographer

Rya Nell

Posts: 539

New Orleans, Louisiana, US

I just will say that your current avatar is not your strongest shot.  Its too dark and obscured.

Sep 10 05 06:48 pm Link

Photographer

LongWindFPV Visuals

Posts: 7052

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Welcome to MM and good luck.

When posting images to a site like this, it "can" fall in one of several categories.

Honest opinion.

1) Outstanding!
2) Well done
3) Terrific
4) Hm, pretty good
...4.5) it's a'ight
...4.6) it's kinda a'ight
...4.7) hm, it's kinda a'ight
...4.8) um, it's kinda kinda a'ight
...4.9) eh, I see somethin', but it's hard to see...definitely needs work
5) Um, not so good
...5.5) not good at all
...5.6) dood, that's sucky
...5.7) man, that's just plain sucky
...5.8) the hell did you feed your camera with? tragic-balanced film!?
6) HUH!?
...6.5) WTF is crap like that doing on here!?
...6.6) the Police will be after your ass
...6.7) the FBI is at your front door man. ya better book while you can!
7) You're going to hell for that

The quality of your images is at #5.5. Your potential for modeling and your look (?) is 4.8, but let me add that you do have good features. I can see them coming out a lot more with a good photographer and MUA.

Based on this look: https://modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pic_id=4321f30380771
I see a potential sexy hotty trapped underneath some well intentioned extra weight.

Sep 10 05 07:11 pm Link

Model

Cate

Posts: 19

Stanford, California, US

Hey critique me, Joe!  I really liked your ranking system, hah.

Sep 10 05 08:38 pm Link

Photographer

LongWindFPV Visuals

Posts: 7052

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Cate wrote:
Hey critique me, Joe!  I really liked your ranking system, hah.

Well, since you're asking me to critique you in someone else's thread (a No. 7), thereby implicating the both of us in a thread hijacking offense punishable by banning from MM land, we're both an automatic 6.7!

*jumps out the window*

big_smile

Sep 10 05 09:57 pm Link

Model

Cate

Posts: 19

Stanford, California, US

shit! 

well i checked out this chicks stuff and i agree with other people.  need better pictures but you have potential.  check out the modeling forum and get some tips from other models. 


(pssst, joe go see the thread below this one that i wrote)

Sep 10 05 10:12 pm Link

Photographer

Fireflyfotography

Posts: 321

Las Colinas, Panamá, Panama

Looking up one is nice but yes I agree most are crap sorry

Sep 11 05 04:07 pm Link