Forums > Photography Talk > Processing artistic film legally

Photographer

nrvphotography

Posts: 1050

Knoxville, Tennessee, US

CM Photography wrote:
There is a search feature:

Ooops!

Dec 01 05 12:15 pm Link

Photographer

nrvphotography

Posts: 1050

Knoxville, Tennessee, US

Marvin Dockery wrote:
You are living in a perfect location to find, and photograph, college models. Small town, big school.....to protect you and your models, I would have them processed away from where you live.  Just one town away would help.
........Walgreens have done a good job.

Marvin,
You are right and I am trying to figure out how to promote myself; one MMer suggested posting flyers on bulletin boards on campus with some photos on it. Ya think with 20,000 students here..... smile I did take the film to a processor in the next town! Like you said, this IS a small town!

As far as Walgreens goes, I took a roll there and the machine ripped holes in the film! So never again. sad My daughter's photography class teacher verified it for me. Glad I shot more than one roll!

Thanks for the advice.

Dec 01 05 12:22 pm Link

Photographer

Marvin Dockery

Posts: 2243

Alcoa, Tennessee, US

nrvphotography wrote:

Marvin,
You are right and I am trying to figure out how to promote myself; one MMer suggested posting flyers on bulletin boards on campus with some photos on it. Ya think with 20,000 students here..... smile I did take the film to a processor in the next town! Like you said, this IS a small town!

As far as Walgreens goes, I took a roll there and the machine ripped holes in the film! So never again. sad My daughter's photography class teacher verified it for me. Glad I shot more than one roll!

Thanks for the advice.

I have only had one machine failure, and it was at a Wolf camera store back on the mid 1980s.  I did a aerial job showing the new turf on the University of Tennessee football field, for the turf company out of Texas.

Shot two rolls during a game, and turned both rolls in at one time. (Big Mistake) The machine broke a gear, and jammed, ruining both rolls. I was on a 48hour deadline, so no re shoots possible. Cost me $1200.00.

But This only happened once, and I have never had a processing maching failure since then. If its a paid job, I keep the back up roll in my pocket until the first roll clears the machine.

Put up models needed notice's in the student center, and also in, or near the art dept.


This ad works.

"Local photographer needs a few  model's to complete some fine art projects. Ages 18 to 24, Dress size 2- 8, race unimportant, Some tattoos and piercings OK. No porn. Call for references." Paid shoots  (Your phone number)

Check the notices often. A model will often take the notice with her.

I use to shoot aerials of the VPI football games.

Dec 01 05 01:18 pm Link

Photographer

nrvphotography

Posts: 1050

Knoxville, Tennessee, US

Marvin,
Thanks for the detailed response! I guess a machine failure can happen about anywhere! When I used to do weddings I started getting paranoid so I carried two camera bodies with me!

Good tip on the notices. BTW I graduated from NC State! Rather be a Wolfpacker than a "Hokie"! smile Did get Coach Beamer to sign a photo several years ago though!

Ken

Dec 01 05 03:27 pm Link

Photographer

MorTis

Posts: 121

Chiang Mai, Northern, Thailand

well usually any professional photo processors won't care if your shoot are "adult artistic shoots"

things like CVS / walgreens will have a problem if you do not talk to them first.  If you talk to the photo dept manager, show them you are a *professional* photographer, shoe them your profilio and give them a business card, they will usually processor you stuff also too at the point.

And me and my friend have been using www.mpix.com for our digital > film . paper processing

Dec 01 05 06:20 pm Link

Photographer

BCG

Posts: 7316

San Antonio, Florida, US

i find my polaroid land camera suits my needs for discreet processing.




q: what do you call a polish albino with one leg?!?

a: a polaroid one step

Dec 01 05 06:36 pm Link

Photographer

Nate Kalushner

Posts: 284

Los Angeles, California, US

I work at a Pro Photo Lab and in all honesty we dont care what it is you want us to process/print as long as its legal. every couple months we have a customer come in who has us process and mount over 2000 slides... all hardcore porn. lol

Nate

Dec 01 05 10:28 pm Link

Photographer

Creative Image

Posts: 1417

Avon, Connecticut, US

Eric Foltz wrote:
The only recommendation I would make is that you get a copy of a picture ID showing the model's age to show the lab people if they question it.

Eric Foltz

and make/keep a copy of it.
Ron

Dec 02 05 09:56 am Link

Photographer

Rp-photo

Posts: 42711

Houston, Texas, US

BCG wrote:
iq: what do you call a polish albino with one leg?!?

a: a polaroid one step

In Texas, we tell Aggie jokes!

Dec 02 05 10:40 am Link

Photographer

Mark Key Photography

Posts: 1346

HAVERTOWN, Pennsylvania, US

Most processors have their own set of rules. I worked in a lab and they had several employees under 18 (wonder if this a HAZMAT/PHMSA violation ) who were not allowed to print nude pics of any kind. But the rest were allowed to process anything short of kiddy porn or bestiality.

Best to ask the person who is actually processing your film what their policy is.

Dec 02 05 08:05 pm Link

Photographer

Shawn Kuck

Posts: 407

RANSON, West Virginia, US

nrvphotography wrote:
I HOPE this is a valid and allowable question. I do not do my own processing and would like a reputable mail order processing business for artistic photos. These are shots involving implied or nude poses. i do not want my local processor to have me arrested for what they might consider pornography! I have done mainly nature and wedding photography for the past 25 years so am not a GWC type. Any help appreciated.

Ken

Dale Labs in Florida is great, and so is Luck Color Lab in Cleveland, TN. But I agree with finding a pro lab in your area. Why spend all that money buying pro film and send it to wolf camera?

Shawn

Dec 02 05 10:38 pm Link

Photographer

Shawn Kuck

Posts: 407

RANSON, West Virginia, US

KM von Seidl wrote:

Implied or nude shots?  Worried about being porn?  Where do you live?  A red state?

Look, just send your nudie film to a blue state with artists....any LA or NYC pro lab will do.

oh now this isn't a political post...

Shawn

Dec 02 05 10:41 pm Link

Photographer

Shawn Kuck

Posts: 407

RANSON, West Virginia, US

Marvin Dockery wrote:
If you think GWC is bad, what about models that do nude shoots, and furnish a camera for the guy to use. There are places in FL that does this.

That would be GWOC...



I still don't get whole GWC thing.

Shawn

Dec 02 05 10:49 pm Link

Photographer

Rocky Dawson

Posts: 68

Columbus, Ohio, US

I've been working in one hour labs for nearly 20 years. It really is up to the company and employee to decide what they're ok to print. Personally I'd always done anything legal and I've only had to deal with the police 3 times.

As for

Keyronn wrote:
(wonder if this a HAZMAT/PHMSA violation )

Never a problem there as long as everyone has had some training on safety procedures and equipment.

Dec 02 05 10:52 pm Link

Photographer

Kevin P Back

Posts: 12

Middletown, Ohio, US

What is a GWC ?

Dec 02 05 11:23 pm Link

Photographer

Mark Key Photography

Posts: 1346

HAVERTOWN, Pennsylvania, US

Kevin B wrote:
What is a GWC ?

Guy With Camera
derogatory term for a guy taking pics of models with no training or understanding of lighting, composition, depth of field, etc.

Dec 03 05 12:30 am Link

Photographer

Mark Key Photography

Posts: 1346

HAVERTOWN, Pennsylvania, US

Rocky Dawson wrote:
As for
Never a problem there as long as everyone has had some training on safety procedures and equipment.

I'm not sure Rocky.. I worked in a lab that wouldn't allow anyone under 18 to work around photo processing chemicals. I'll have to check on that.

Dec 03 05 12:33 am Link