This thread was locked on 2008-01-26 16:22:56
Photographer
Merlinpix
Posts: 7118
Farmingdale, New York, US
I wuz here....and I may cum again!
Photographer
Z_Photo
Posts: 7079
Huntsville, Alabama, US
i guess i would be interested in what your artistic vision was too. it is hard to tell. so to speak
Photographer
sdsteve
Posts: 1610
Spokane, Washington, US
e-string wrote:
What an annoyingly slow website.
But the drug series is quite interesting. it wasnt slow at the beginning, maybe all of us looking at it is slowing it down
p.s. e-string...you rock!
Model
Jacqui L
Posts: 1217
Rolla, Missouri, US
Personally, I find it a little disturbing. Not necessarily that there's cum on faces, but the expressions that go with it. It's almost a sad look. Almost like it's making a statement on the damage that pornography can do to people.
Photographer
A-M-P
Posts: 18465
Orlando, Florida, US
Photographer
GCobb Photography
Posts: 15898
Southaven, Mississippi, US
NSE Films wrote:
I've not posted pornography here, it's art; I posted it to create some kind of discussion... Much like the "Stop 'Monkeying' around" thread. Infact, I was inspired to start this thread after seeing the reaction to that thread, with regards child abuse. Do you care to explain why someone wouldn't think the OP is pr0n related after looking at the braindead subject line?
Photographer
sdsteve
Posts: 1610
Spokane, Washington, US
Jacqui L wrote:
Personally, I find it a little disturbing. Not necessarily that there's cum on faces, but the expressions that go with it. It's almost a sad look. Almost like it's making a statement on the damage that pornography can do to people. could be, thats what art is right? something that makes you stop, look, and think?
thats why i think all of the photos on that site are pretty awesome!
Photographer
Marco Carocari
Posts: 128
Palm Springs, California, US
Kate Whittum wrote:
Type it into your browser as a .com and make sure you have a vomit receptacle handy. lol...that was SO GROSS! i turned it off after the first minute...my friends all tried to get me to sit through it.
no, thanks.
: )
lol
Photographer
SayCheeZ!
Posts: 20621
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
sdsteve wrote:
interesting idea i guess, i am just wondering who is providing the cum? Someone by the name of Elmer.
(yea, I got sucked into a thread that should've been locked)
Photographer
Z_Photo
Posts: 7079
Huntsville, Alabama, US
oh come on people. it is not disgusting nor is it porn. i would just like to know how the phtographer came up with it
Photographer
StephenEastwood
Posts: 19585
Great Neck, New York, US
Marco Carocari wrote:
hmmm...interesting.
i wish there was a making-of video...lol..just for laughs.
: ) I will get to work on that! I of course need some attractive female models and a couple of fluffers! Any volunteers?
Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com
Photographer
Blue Cube Imaging
Posts: 11883
Ashland, Oregon, US
NSE Films wrote:
I've not posted pornography here, it's art; I posted it to create some kind of discussion... Much like the "Stop 'Monkeying' around" thread. Infact, I was inspired to start this thread after seeing the reaction to that thread, with regards child abuse. I didn't say it was porn. However people with the power to lock may not see the humor (or the art) in the thread title.
Model
e-string
Posts: 24002
Kansas City, Missouri, US
It's threads like this that tell me who is severely repressed. 
Photographer
GCobb Photography
Posts: 15898
Southaven, Mississippi, US
Z_Photo wrote:
oh come on people. it is not disgusting nor is it porn. i would just like to know how the phtographer came up with it Jizz on the face isn't pron.....oh okay.
Photographer
StephenEastwood
Posts: 19585
Great Neck, New York, US
BlackWatch wrote:
No please enlighten me...I thought I had every perversion memorized... No one needs to go to that 2 girls one cup site believe me, you'll be traumatized for life.
Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com
Photographer
Andrew Attah
Posts: 1699
London, England, United Kingdom
Greg Cobb Photography wrote:
Do you care to explain why someone wouldn't think the OP is pr0n related after looking at the braindead subject line? lol braindead.
That's what they are, aren't they? I was simply being literal.
Photographer
Z_Photo
Posts: 7079
Huntsville, Alabama, US
StephenEastwood wrote:
I will get to work on that! I of course need some attractive female models and a couple of fluffers! Any volunteers?
Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com to volunteer what does one raise? presumably not a hand
Photographer
Andrew Attah
Posts: 1699
London, England, United Kingdom
Greg Cobb Photography wrote:
Jizz on the face isn't pron.....oh okay. Okay, well leave the thread then...?
Photographer
StephenEastwood
Posts: 19585
Great Neck, New York, US
Greg Cobb Photography wrote:
Jizz on the face isn't pron.....oh okay. I would have to agree, by its very nature its not porn, it could be viewed as art and in context as its displyed it woudl never make it as porn so while maybe in bad taste or bad art by some its still falling under the catagory of art.
Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com
Model
e-string
Posts: 24002
Kansas City, Missouri, US
Greg Cobb Photography wrote:
Do you care to explain why someone wouldn't think the OP is pr0n related after looking at the braindead subject line? Maybe because they're smart enough to look at the links before making any rash judgment on the thread?
|
