Forums > Digital Art and Retouching > Image processing "vs" retouching

Retoucher

Kevin_Connery

Posts: 3307

Fullerton, California, US

In recent years, more and more retouchers have been entering the field without a strong background in traditional 'image processing'. There's nothing wrong with this, as much of what is involved with that isn't applicable, but I'm curious as to what areas of traditional image processing and signal analysis can be applied effectively to retouching, yet aren't in widespread use today.

One inobvious one is frequency splitting. Sean Baker started a (now quite long) thread on this (HighPass Sucks (+ solution)), and it's almost certainly not the only applicable technique.

Deconvolution can be used to sharpen images without the artifacts inherent to USM and similar. Various edge detection techniques can be used to create edge masks. FFT can be used to reduce/eliminate moire patterns.

What else?

Nov 01 09 10:22 am Link

Photographer

Duncan Hall

Posts: 3104

San Francisco, California, US

Do you have an example of a good edge detection technique? I've been trying to improve my extractions.

Nov 01 09 11:28 am Link

Retoucher

Natalia_Taffarel

Posts: 7665

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Duncan Hall wrote:
Do you have an example of a good edge detection technique? I've been trying to improve my extractions.

¬¬ how about HP?

x

Nov 01 09 12:22 pm Link

Photographer

Duncan Hall

Posts: 3104

San Francisco, California, US

Natalia_Taffarel wrote:

¬¬ how about HP?

x

O_O That's just crazy enough to work..

Nov 01 09 12:42 pm Link