Zaryana Milan wrote:
Let's try it

Zaryana:
Your hair is longer than you - wow. Maybe that should be showcased in your port.

Port: 5.5
Looks: 8
Figure: 8
Expressions: 7.5

Overall; 7.5

Lakeshore Photography wrote:
I'm game!

Lakeshore:
A wonderful port from a hobbyist. You definitely have a good eye for beauty.
Port: 8
Lighting: 7
Camera Angles: 8.5
Post Production: 7

Overall: 7.5

Digital Blitz wrote:

Zaryana:
Your hair is longer than you - wow. Maybe that should be showcased in your port.

Port: 5.5
Looks: 8
Figure: 8
Expressions: 7.5

Overall; 7.5

Thank you very much.
For my hair, I will try to do it during my Travel in September.
May I ask about the port :
How do you rate it ? It is about the variety of work, the number of photos ?

Digital Blitz wrote:
Shervivor:
Your themes and conceptualizations are very good, but we need to improve our execution.

Port: 7
Conceptualization: 8.5
Lighting: 5.5
Camera angles: 6

Overall: 6

Thanks so much! Yes, I need to invest in more/better lighting.

Lady Linnifred wrote:
Do your worst

Linnifred:
My sympathies and prayers with you. I hope you get well soon. Medical has done a lot of improvements in recent years and your cure will be there somewhere.

I will still be blunt and honest in my opinion - again these are opinions only. Your port needs some improvements. A stats of Bust:    36" Waist:    0" Hips:    0" do not help.

Port: 5.5
Looks: 7.5
Figure: 6
Expressions: 7

Overall: 7

Slawee wrote:
Sounds good. Can you rate my portfolio, please?

HI Slawee:
Like I told you in my other forum - your expressions are your weakest link - as a print model, one is expected to show a range of emotions to sell a product or the art itself.

Port: 5
Looks: 7
Figure: 7.5
Expressions: 4

Overall: 5.5

Baris  Ari wrote:
I would like to get rated too!

Baris:
Your port needs drastic improvements. Start by giving the stats.

Port: 5
Looks: 7
Figure: 6.5
Expressions: 7

Overall: 6

Adra Janean wrote:
Me too pretty please!

Adra:
Your port has too few pictures, your weight is listed at 0. Your website has a lot of pictures where you look stunning, you need to put them here in MM.

Rating based on MM port:

Port: 4
Looks: 7
Figure:6
Expressions: 7
Overall: 5

Digital Blitz wrote:

Adra:
Your port has too few pictures, your weight is listed at 0. Your website has a lot of pictures where you look stunning, you need to put them here in MM.

Rating based on MM port:

Port: 4
Looks: 7
Figure:6
Expressions: 7
Overall: 5

Thanks so much for the feedback!

Autumn Rose Brightly wrote:
I'll play

Port: 6
Looks: 7
Figure: 6.5
Expressions: 7

Overall: 6

Nikki Aleece wrote:
I'll play....

Nikki:
You have a big pretty eyes - a great attribute for print modeling. Work on your expressions and build a diverse port.

Looks: 7.5
Figure: 6.5
Expressions: 6
Port: 4.5
Overall; 5.5

Digital Blitz wrote:

HI Slawee:
Like I told you in my other forum - your expressions are your weakest link - as a print model, one is expected to show a range of emotions to sell a product or the art itself.

Port: 5
Looks: 7
Figure: 7.5
Expressions: 4

Overall: 5.5

Thank you very much. Will work on that

SEAK Photography wrote:
Show me the numbers!

Very commendable port. Love the way you are playing with light and shadows in some of the pictures.

Port: 8
Lighting: 8.5
Camera Angles: 8
Conceptualization: 7
Overall: 7.5

Kandy Vert wrote:
Please rate me! Much much much appreciated ^_^

Nice and diverse port. You also have a nice hourglass figure.

Port: 8
Looks: 7
Figure: 8
Expressions: 7

Overall: 7

Digital Blitz wrote:

Nice and diverse port. You also have a nice hourglass figure.

Port: 8
Looks: 7
Figure: 8
Expressions: 7

Overall: 7

Thanks so much! I would actually give myself the same rate as well... although my overall should be 7.5?!!? The difference between a B and a B+!!!

Cheers

Jason Grubbs wrote:
Me please?

Jason:
YOu dont need me to tell you that your port with selfies in it suck big time. Go ahead and build a port. Otherwise, my ratings will disillusion you from modeling.
Good Luck!

JoseM Photography wrote:
yes please!

With a film major background, you have a good eye for beauty - but need to expand your port to make is diverse a little.

Port: 6.5
Lighting: 7.5
Conceptualization: 8
Post production: 7

Overall: 7

jahnhall wrote:
i'm down...and thank you!

I would like some more diversity in your port. Your portraits are very nice.

Lighting: 7
Conceptualization: 7
Port: 7.5
Camera angles: 7

Overall: 7

maasj wrote:
I'm in need of some critique

What an outstanding start. I would love to see some more pictures in your port. I do not want to disappoint you with low marks because of lack of quantity.

Good Luck.

JoshuaDavisPhotography wrote:
Would love to know!

You capture human moods very well. I would like you to put a few more pictures - more diverse the better.

Port: 5.5
Lighting and Shadows: 7.5
Conceptualization: 7
Camera angles: 7

Overall: 6.5

Donnie Dae wrote:
I'm game!

Donnie
You have a well toned figure, good expressions, and a diverse enough port, and you live in NY. You have everything going. How come I haven't seen in the magazines? YOu must be terrible in marketing yourself.

Port: 7.5
Looks:7
Expressions: 8
Figure: 8.5

Overall: 8

Wicked LA Pix wrote:
I would love to know

Sir:
An accomplished photographer asking me to rate him is an honor. I shall never even be one tenth of what you are as a photographer. Your pictures are simply awe inspiring.

The above said, I seriously feel that in a few pictures you have gone a overboard with the post production editing. In my opinion - post production work is to enhance a picture and hide blemishes not to the extent of losing originality. Again - forgive me if I am worng in my opinion.

Camera angles: 9
Lighting: 9
Port: 8
Post production: 7.5

Overall: 8.5