Forums > General Industry > problems with boyfriend escorts

Photographer

Art of the nude

Posts: 12067

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

Art of the nude wrote:
I have this portfolio which is all nudes, and I have another which is all very sweet and innocent.  I don't allow escorts when shooting for either.

And, from the models I've spoken with, while they sometimes get inapproriate message from photographers, male models are a much bigger problem.

Stanley L Moore wrote:
I beg tpo differ. In 30 years of photographing I have only had 3 inapproipriate encounters with male models.

You aren't, best I can tell, a young female model.

Jul 22 12 02:50 pm Link

Photographer

Stanley L Moore

Posts: 1681

Houston, Texas, US

Art of the nude wrote:
You aren't, best I can tell, a young female model.

True enough. Maybe I am old school but I was taught at Mother's knee to always be respectful to young ladies (of any age). So it is beyond my ken to suspect handsome young male models would behave in any way that is ungentlemanly. I know crudity and bluntness rather than politeness is more the order of our degenerate modern times. Maybe I have outlived the virtues of a more gracious past.

Jul 22 12 07:54 pm Link

Photographer

KonstantKarma

Posts: 2513

Campobello, South Carolina, US

I have observed a LOT of problems/advances from the male "models" in my city - and I use the term models with hesitancy.  I know there are actual and professional male models in some areas, but in smaller cities...

Jul 23 12 05:55 am Link

Photographer

Retro Wks

Posts: 34

Irvine, California, US

So far I have had only good boyfriends escorting shoots... I am glad I lucked out so far.  One had helped the model putting phenomenal outfits together before the shoot.  Others I keep occupied by having them hold the reflector, and then other boyfriends have been helpful carrying and watching over my gear.  My feeling is that when I include them in the shoot, things are fine.

Jul 23 12 08:02 am Link

Photographer

Digital Photo PLUS

Posts: 5503

Lorton, Virginia, US

Vickie Lan Photography wrote:
So with that bring said, I'm just genuinely curious. Does anyone have stories to share that can help explain why the boyfriend escort is an issue?

30-40 shoots with boyfriends present - no problems. Another 50-60 shoots with parents, friends, other models present - no problems.

No issues here.

Jul 23 12 12:49 pm Link

Photographer

ChristopherRoss

Posts: 1559

Eškašem, Badakhshan, Afghanistan

Vickie Lan Photography wrote:
So with that bring said, I'm just genuinely curious. Does anyone have stories to share that can help explain why the boyfriend escort is an issue?

I generally invite boyfriends / husbands to the shoot, it's wonderful to do some couple shots and help the model(s) feel at ease but, I do have an issue with how escorts are something presented.

If a model wants to bring her boyfriend/girlfriend along because she's nervous about shooting, I encourage them to bring a friend but if a model indicates it's because she's not comfortable being alone with me ... I cancel the shoot immediately, if they're under the impression I'm going to rape them unless they bring a bodyguard than I don't want them in my studio.

Jul 23 12 12:58 pm Link

Photographer

Naughty Ties

Posts: 3445

Riverview, Florida, US

Retro Wks wrote:
So far I have had only good boyfriends escorting shoots... I am glad I lucked out so far.  One had helped the model putting phenomenal outfits together before the shoot.  Others I keep occupied by having them hold the reflector, and then other boyfriends have been helpful carrying and watching over my gear.  My feeling is that when I include them in the shoot, things are fine.

Consider yourself lucky.

Jul 23 12 12:59 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Photo PLUS

Posts: 5503

Lorton, Virginia, US

ASYLUM - Photo wrote:
I will say, I haven't had many jobs where I can just show up with a random person and my employer was fine with it.

How about a model showing up for a shoot with a random photographer from the Internet alone?  Need I mention a certain model and a certain person that showed up with her for my shoot?

Jul 23 12 01:00 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Photo PLUS

Posts: 5503

Lorton, Virginia, US

Ken Marcus Studios wrote:
The 'boyfriend escort' is an issue to male photographers that somehow feel that when they are shooting a female model, that there is a chance for romance and maybe they'll get laid.

Having a boyfriend or husband on the shoot is a 'buzz-kill' to their fantasy and actually forces them to behave like a professional and concentrate on the photography. Many photographers don't want or like that . . .

KM

I agree. I'm glad that one of the most popular photographers on MM thinks likewise. The thing with other people on the set interfering is bullshit. If you can't concentrate or keep people on your set in check then maybe you should consider collecting stamps for a hobby.

Same goes for the "muses". They are just lay hopefuls. If you don't have ideas that you were dying to make happen a year before the shoot with a particular model a "muse" is not going to help you.

Jul 23 12 01:09 pm Link

Photographer

Image K

Posts: 23400

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Digital Photo PLUS wrote:
I agree. I'm glad that one of the most popular photographers on MM thinks likewise. The thing with other people on the set interfering is bullshit. If you can't concentrate or keep people on your set in check then maybe you should consider collecting stamps for a hobby.

Ya know what's funny?

Ken doesn't allow [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/88-90_Ford_llama herder_Wagon.jpg/120px-88-90_Ford_llama herder_Wagon.jpg[/img]s. Yeah, he allows them to bring them to the set, but doesn't allow them in the shooting area.

He defines "llama herders" his own way.

From earlier in the thread:

https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thread_id=843823

Ken Marcus Studios wrote:
Just to clarify . . . . . I do NOT allow [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/88-90_Ford_llama herder_Wagon.jpg/120px-88-90_Ford_llama herder_Wagon.jpg[/img]s (or anyone not involved with the shoot) to be present in the shooting area or to be in the line of sight of the model during the entire session.

I do have a waiting area where they can make themselves at home and wait, but they are not in contact with the model during the shoot at all.

Sometimes I will, when taking a break, show the bf/llama herder some of the better images that we've done to share the experience with them and remove any doubt that the shoot is what it was intended to be.

I cannot understand why any photographer would allow extrainous people to be on set during a shoot . . . whether they be bf/llama herders or anybody else that has no business being on the shoot.

He also admits to being ripped off by [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/88-90_Ford_llama herder_Wagon.jpg/120px-88-90_Ford_llama herder_Wagon.jpg[/img]s, and admits that they only account for 20% of the models that he shoots.

As has been pointed out, Ken's [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/88-90_Ford_llama herder_Wagon.jpg/120px-88-90_Ford_llama herder_Wagon.jpg[/img] policy as compared to many MM/internet photographers policy is an apples-and-oranges comparison...for a variety of reasons.

Read the whole thread. Those reasons are in plain sight.

Jul 24 12 12:03 am Link

Model

Fur Elise

Posts: 1814

Seattle, Washington, US

I thought I was going to troll this thread with some crazy ass story to make this obscenely ridiculous... on a lark....but eh. Reading thru has been entertaining enough, so it seems.

When I model, I don't like escorts with me unless they are doing a job of some sort. I do not like being watched by a spectator, even less so by someone who has no real comprehension of what I am doing... I like bringing other models with me and taking turns at being shot.

When I shoot, I have had escorts steal from me. I let the model know and see what they do from there, then we go from there. I don't like escorts unless they are willing to run to the store to get me some tea, hold the reflector, make themselves useful, and kindly stfu. If they can do that, I love them. I'm busy, I see something I need to catch with my lens, I have no time to dilly dally as my models makeup wilts. I also do not like it when the models look to the escort for reassurance. My stance is 'It makes you feel better? Great, go home and have him/her take a picture of you in the bedroom... that's not my goal here so do the job you said you could do, or help me cut my losses and we'll cut out early.'



Just how I feel about it.

Jul 24 12 12:17 am Link

Photographer

B R U N E S C I

Posts: 25319

Bath, England, United Kingdom

Image K wrote:
Ken doesn't allow llama herders. Yeah, he allows them to bring them to the set, but doesn't allow them in the shooting area.

Yup. That's not an llama herder, that's a driver.

Ken is lucky that he has a big studio with a dedicated waiting area and staff to keep an eye on 'drivers' while they're waiting. For those of us who don't have those facilities, the drivers simply have to wait outside.

Allowing drivers to sit in a separate dedicated waiting room is NOT the same as allowing a mouth-breathing 'llama herder' to be looking over your shoulder on set or roaming unwatched around your private residence while you're shooting.



Just my $0.02

Ciao
Stefano
www.stefanobrunesci.com

Jul 24 12 12:28 am Link

Photographer

Herman Surkis

Posts: 10856

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

ArtemisAesthetic wrote:
The stories that I have heard are from photographers I have worked with, complaining about how the BF's the tog has worked with in the past, was basically in the way the entire shoot. Which means the bf is either over protective, or knows nothing of the industry and in turn acts immature. Which then causes the "llama herders" that are not like that to have a bad rap due to the previous llama herders somehow upsetting the photographer. Really its a chain reaction, and not all llama herders are like that. If the photographer feels uncomfortable with a bf, then a friend (no matter the gender) should be allowed to come, especially if it is the first shoot between the photographer and model. That is the negative of being a freelance model and photographer, not being signed with an agency- going through the legitimate system causes sexually suppressed tendencies to spill out when a female/male model is alone with a male/female photographer. I have even heard horror stories of represented  models experiencing what unsigned, freelance models experience, it is just less likely to occur if you are being marketed by a reputable agency.

Personally, as a model, having my manager/bf at my gigs is not a factor to my performance suffering. I always focus 100% and beyond on the job at hand, if a model is distracted by a bf being in the background, then they have personal issues that need to be worked out. Either comes from the bf stating that she should not do certain things, then she becomes nervous when he is there, bla bla...I have experienced that before, which is why I know. If the llama herder is more than a friend, then the model should inform that person where she stands in relation to her career, limits, etc...First hand the llama herder knows not to disrupt.

The only few times when I was independent at a shoot, is when the photographer (only males) tried to make a move on me, or went too far. Which is why I have that standard rule. Every photographer whom restricts llama herders, is either coning as a photographer or has a personal problem with it, a one time test should be reasonable. As in, the llama herder comes to the first shoot, if everything runs smoothly, then the other ones (if there are) could be one on one. Though the photographer could just be waiting for that, then he pounces.

I believe that photographers should give llama herders a chance, especially if the model is one of a kind, and they may not be able to shoot with that artist again.

As has been said on other threads.

I have no problem with llama herders, as long as they will fax a photo ID and at least 10 references, and a police check at least 2 weeks prior to the shoot.

Jul 24 12 07:38 am Link

Photographer

Burle-Skit Art Perform

Posts: 42

Houston, Texas, US

"Boyfriend escorts" can be trouble in other ways than just their presence as I learned a few hours ago.

I read into the lines of whom I am dealing with as best as I can.

In the first shoot attempt with this 18 year old Mayhem model, she messaged about being late to the shoot because she and her boyfriend had to pick up her boyfriend's sister in one part of town and then drop her off at his mom's in another part.  For me, it was reschedule because she wanted to shoot in the evening after that commuter task was completed.  Due to domestic reasons, I don't start shoots in the evening.

And reading the lines, I could sense some sort of dependence/dominance issues here that set off some flags to me.

But I really liked her look and for her age she seems to be prolific and focused so I kept discussions with her via FB.

We set up for later this afternoon, but I practically called off the shoot with her because she insisted her boyfriend be allowed in the living room.  And she really went off about it.

I politely told her in our initial prior discussions that husbands, parents or other understanding relatives and girlfriends are ok to wait inside.  But a boyfriend would have to wait in the car or go to the mall across the street.  (At the time, she didn't reply to that during that chat.)

During this final chat, she went off on a rant about her boyfriend being all wonderful and all the other photographers "luv" him and she was not about to let him wait in the car for three hours, that would be "rude." 
S
he profusely kept asking why can't he wait inside and then insinuated that I would "try sh-t" with her.  She just went off like a volcano and wouldn't stop.  I conceded a couple points to her but, man, she would not stop.  She asked why I was being "flaky" about her boyfriend.

I politely replied that I would have some trust issues of my own with a very young man on my set that was neither husband nor relative.  I told her another model I worked with a few weeks ago kept her boyfriend in the car the whole time and then she inferred her boyfriend was too good for that.

I continued that of the twenty-three equally beautiful female models I've shot with the past couple years, I didn't "try" a single thing with any of them. And nineteen of them had NO escorts of any kind.  Indeed, all I've worked with are listed and I highly doubt any of them would have a bad word to say about me.  In fact, a couple of them told me even though I paid less, these zany skits were more fun than regular photo shooting. smile  Some of these Mayhem ladies, I have worked with more than once.

I was getting pretty freaked out by this model's overly huffy and incessant verbiage.  So I told her this conversation was going off the rails and as I was about to wish her luck with her pursuits, she cut off the chat (which is sitting in my FB chat as a captured lesson for the future) and blocked me, ha ha.

Since there is another model involved for this afternoon's shoot, I believe I will have to call it off in the interest of safety.  The 18-year old was volatile enough and according to one of her posts on FB, the boyfriend packs heat. Ah,Texas! Fortunate that I'm not using my home studio right now.  So in the interest of keeping the other model and myself away from a potential scene, regardless, I'm calling the shoot off as much as I want to really do it.

My domestic life, it's hard to find free days and weekends to shoot especially since the weather is not hot here yet.  But safety first since the 18 year old has the time and shoot address...as well as the attitude.  I wouldn't count on it but it is possible they could show up to continue (or conclude) the FB chat. :p

From my experience so far, husbands have been ok.  They didn't bother the shoot as such.  Patiently played their phone games or watched TV until we were done. I guess I've just been lucky so far as that's concerned.

And of escorting un-related males, in my experience?

I did one shoot where one model brought her male "manager" unannounced.  He was ok but as I was setting stuff up here and there, he saw my guitars and asked if I could "play something."  I mean, really, time is literally money on a shoot when I'm paying, eh?  So I just popped on a YouTube vid of me playing a cover of Shocking Blue's "Demon Lover" and went back to what I was doing,

Another shoot, I offered to let a model's boyfriend come inside to wait. Upon meeting him, he seemed to be a decent and safe guy.  Initially the agreement with the model was to have him wait outside and he preferred to remain doing so.  Only problem is, he kept coming inside to ask her something this or that...one time to ask, "Everything ok, babe?"  To me, she briefly seemed uneasy at that particular moment as the recording was on.

I don't have a set escort policy (yet) so I'll have to finally put a mention in my profile.

But on the eve of this shoot, two late responses from my recent mass PM rush are in the inbox.  One is 26, the other is 35...and they look great and are interested in near future possibilities.  Another time we shall say. 

Lessons learned, things to consider.

Love da Mayhem!

Mar 27 16 04:21 am Link

Hair Stylist

rick lesser

Posts: 1116

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

Years ago I was working on a shoot for a woman who's husband insisted on being there.  We were shooting in and around their apt.  He told me how to do her hair, makeup, what she typically wore.  He hated everything I tried to do.  She on the other hand was loving my direction.  Finally I asked he to leave.  I couldn't take it.  It was a complete nightmare.  The photographer gave me free rain to do so because he was driving us both crazy.  The images we got were great after he was gone.  Of course he hated them.  I asked him if he really had met his wife as he was trying to create an image of her that was not at all who she really was.  I believe they are now divorced!   I hate when models bring anyone other then the people who should be there.   I am not there for them to "help me do my job"  R-

Mar 27 16 08:18 am Link