Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico
Digital...I knew it hahahahahaa.
Nov 16 12 10:11 am Link
Imperial, California, US
Whichever, it doesn't matter, I'm still allergic to cats!!:-)))
Nov 16 12 10:19 am Link
Puyallup, Washington, US
Do you have a link? I'd love to read it.
Nov 16 12 11:55 am Link
London, England, United Kingdom
Hector Fernandez wrote:
Yes you were, but probably for the wrong reason.As Kaouthia stated those artifacts on the nose are a result of jpeg compression and are not present on the full res in any shape or form. They could have just as easily been present in a scanned negative/photo after linking on here via flickr.
Leggy Mountbatten wrote:
Of course it does, thats what it is. I was alluding to another false argument earlier that suggested the bokeh was to modern for it to be film.
Nov 16 12 12:00 pm Link
Saint Louis, Missouri, US
Ruben Vasquez wrote:
Not to the complete publication. It is excerpted on Page 9 of this web site:
Nov 16 12 12:53 pm Link