How usable is this image, given what I have in my portfolio currently? Is it lacking in quality, or could it add something to my port? Thanks in advance to anyone who takes the time to critique it.
Dec 26 12 11:44 am Link
Lodi, California, US
I couldn't see the image
Dec 26 12 11:57 am Link
My bad. I'll try to link it in.
Edit: Original Link Changed.
Dec 26 12 11:59 am Link
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US
Dec 26 12 12:26 pm Link
Thanks a bunch, I'll keep it in there then. And thanks for actually giving a critique. 20 people look at a photo and you both were kind enough to respond, thanks so much.
Dec 26 12 04:34 pm Link
Houston, Texas, US
I think ANY other photo you have is better than this one.
The blacks are filled in. Possibly an issue with exposure or post processing. I'm not sure which, but the image, in my opinion is technically terrible. You almost blend into the background.
The comment about your other images having an almost "illustrated" look is true. However, I think your current avatar is fine. It's much more likely to get you work than the B&W you posted.
Personally, I would not use it.
Dec 26 12 04:49 pm Link
Lutherville-Timonium, Maryland, US
Don't waste time analyzing one picture, use that time to find better photographers. Don't let me catch you coming back to this thread! Go ... shooo
Dec 27 12 12:47 am Link