 Sep 21 13 09:39 am Link  Sep 21 13 10:07 am Link Sep 21 13 10:35 am Link  Sep 27 13 09:08 am Link  Sep 27 13 09:11 am Link Was hard to pick, but I actually think this is a bit too bland:  Oct 04 13 09:39 am Link this one is a bit bizarre  Oct 05 13 01:44 am Link dd photography wrote: https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/1 … c73de1.jpg (18+) Oct 05 13 08:17 am Link This one looks "washed out" to me... It may have been intentional, but it *appears* to have been pushed too far in Lightroom or something. https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/34055906 Oct 05 13 09:04 am Link  Oct 05 13 10:01 am Link This one. It's nice but no pizzazz. You have others that stand out better making this one seem flat in comparison.  Oct 06 13 10:35 pm Link  Composition is weak, model is not attractive, and her expression makes her less so. Oct 07 13 06:36 am Link Oh, Lordy... https://www.modelmayhem.com/2506354#30693744 I feel this photo is...flat in comparison. It doesn't inspire the same posh, I-do-what-I-want attitude that's in the rest of your work. Oct 07 13 06:31 pm Link easy:  not doing anything for you, just plain weird and not in a good way. Oct 07 13 07:07 pm Link This one: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/33650733 She looks like she hasn't got a clue what she is doing on the horse. The accessories look cheap and so does her look to be honest. I also don't like how you "washed" out the tone. Overall it is the least good in your port, in my opinion. There are some very good ones on the other hand… Oct 08 13 07:12 am Link Meisterstuecke wrote: This one: Oct 08 13 08:23 am Link This angle and pose (arms especially) just isn't working for me. She's needing to lift her face to squeeze it into the visible space behind her arm...almost like a short person trying to peer up and over taller folks in front.  Oct 08 13 01:59 pm Link David Kirk wrote: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/28625950 Oct 08 13 04:50 pm Link IMO, this one should have been shot with a larger aperture in order to render the background more out of focus: I find it distracting.  Cheers! Gary Oct 08 13 05:09 pm Link  The skin and hair are blurred way too much. Oct 08 13 05:26 pm Link Ashley Holloway wrote: Sorry, but there is no worst photo in your portfolio. But I'd like this one better if it were sharper: Oct 08 13 05:50 pm Link Camerosity wrote:
Oct 13 13 03:27 pm Link  Oct 13 13 05:11 pm Link  Oct 13 13 05:20 pm Link https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/33789776 Her face angles are better highlighted in the other pictures in the set, while the poses are more flattering in the other shots as well. Oct 13 13 05:25 pm Link https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/28976546 Not a huge fan of the expression, you look a little startled to be on camera. Oct 13 13 05:41 pm Link Kind doesn't fit in and the composition doesn't do it for me.  Oct 13 13 06:29 pm Link  HOMBRE! Oct 14 13 08:24 am Link I would have to say this one https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/29344866 It doesn't compare to everything else in your port but man you are amazing. Just saying. Oct 14 13 03:19 pm Link https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/34095669 The model's skin tone almost blends in with the sheets on the bed. Oct 14 13 03:34 pm Link Call Me Caitlin wrote:
Oct 14 13 07:08 pm Link Awkwardly cropped, boring expression, the haze at left of image is damaging, etc... Oct 15 13 09:28 am Link WTF else am I gonna choose ... the rest are perfect. had to choose you, nothing personal  Oct 15 13 10:15 am Link dd photography wrote: You don't have a single bad image. Oct 15 13 11:17 am Link Nicolette wrote: I'll go with your avatar - especially as the avatar, since it doesn't show your face. It isn't flattering. The combination of the point of view and the pose make your tummy look big and your chest look small. Otherwise I don't think there is a "worst" in your portfolio. Oct 15 13 12:26 pm Link Oct 16 13 12:06 am Link Oct 16 13 12:56 am Link Call Me Caitlin wrote: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/33394433 Oct 18 13 03:43 am Link  Oct 18 13 07:24 am Link Oct 18 13 07:33 am Link |
