Forums >
Photography Talk >
GEAR SHARE: “What to do with an old enlarger"
Stone NYC wrote: While some good things via networking here, I will say that craigslist on my side of the country.. I get hits from my area in Portland and onwards up to Seattle, rarely do things get listed cheap. Maybe some can poach with something that searches automatically every 15 minutes for keywords or something to find them and then they are gone, but photo/camera gear, no real bargains and stuff seems to sit on there a while. Jan 04 16 11:47 pm Link DougBPhoto wrote: Oh interesting, yea I mean, 5 years ago I made a killing buying photo gear on Craigslist, using what I needed at the time, and eBaying the rest, all Canon gear, but now it's not as great, that said, the film photo stuff still seems to be listed pretty cheap now. My 8x10 enlarger was free off of Craigslist, but that's because it's 1,000 lbs and lots of people WANTED it but after a year no one actually could lift it, I got a few strong men and a trailer and got it for a tank of gas. So you have to be willing to make the effort. But each area of the country is different. Some guys get a lot of good stuff from flea markets, LOTS of good stuff, but around here flea markets are absent of ANY photo gear save 35mm junk cameras. So maybe Seatte has a different outlet? Jan 05 16 12:46 am Link Jan 05 16 05:47 pm Link I'm banned, they said they would let me back after the upgrade because of some kind of new control infrastructure. I'm not sure, they banned me for publicly outing a seller who had sold me a lens that didn't cover what he said it would cover and not accepting a return. They said I was causing trouble, when I was just trying to warn people that the person wasn't honest. But that's the way of forums. I lost $900 so I thought my complaint was pretty valid, it's not like it was a $20 dirty filter I was upset about. It was a lens that should have covered 11x14 and didn't. So it was useless to me and I just wanted to return it. I was a fool for paying by check because the guy didn't want to deal with PayPal, little did I realize that was all part of the plan, no repercussions. Stone - just a shot in the dark here. What was the lens you got burned on and do you still have it. I shoot 8 x 10, not 11 x 14 and am always on the lookout for cool old lenses. Jan 06 16 10:24 am Link Dan Dozer wrote: Hey Dan, Jan 06 16 01:56 pm Link Stone NYC wrote: Stone - I can see why you were bummed that the seller tried to pass it off to be able to use on 11 x 14 - that would have been a great lens for that size format. Sorry, but I already have a 210 Schneider Symmar S that is probably about the same lens as your Graphic-Kowa that I use on my 8 x 10. Jan 06 16 02:49 pm Link Dan Dozer wrote: No worries, though I highly doubt it's even similar. It's closer to a Computar but it's TINY, it's the smallest lens I own, I'm surprised it handles 8x10 so well honestly, lens design is interesting because it actually has little to do with size in terms of coverage, anyway it's really small, it's smaller than the canon 50mm 1.8 "thrifty fifty" lens, I mean it's SMALL. The glass barely sticks out of the shutter. It has a 40.5mm filter thread if that gives you any idea of how small it is. Good for hiking. Jan 06 16 09:58 pm Link I donated my super Chromega C enlarger to a youth group. Hope I didn't ruin any lives. Jan 06 16 11:12 pm Link Jan 09 16 03:43 pm Link |